B

        

            B

BAAL (בעל, owner or lord) 1. The 4th son of Jeiel, a Gibeonite ancestor of       
        Saul.      2. The father of Beerah, a Reubenite chieftain who was exiled by  
        the Assyrians

BAAL (DEITY) (See above entry)  The term signifies ownership, not in the 
        sense of sovereignty over a person, but rather the possession of a locality
        lity or attribute; any local god may be so designated after he and his wor-
        shipers had taken possession of a given locality.  From the end of the
        2000's probably, and certainly by the middle of the 1000's B.C., the title 
        was applied specifically to the Amorite god of winter rain and storm, Hadad.
        Baal's activity was limited to nature, while El, the senior god of the Canaa-
        nite pantheon, was supreme in the social or moral sphere. 
                   In his conflict with the Waters, Baal champions the gods against the 
        insults and tyranny of the unruly waters, Sea-and-River.   Baal overcomes 
        him and disperses him so that the waters are a good servant, not a bad     
        master.  Baal is acclaimed king of an everlasting kingdom. There are bibli-
        cal passages (Psalms 29 and 93) where Yahweh is depicted with Baal's at-
        tributes.  The biblical conception of the “Day of the Lord,” implying as it 
        does conflict and victory over the powers of Chaos, is also a development 
        of the old Canaanite theme of Baal's conflict and victory.  In both cases, the 
        Canaanite influence seems to have been strong, with Israel appropriating, 
        through adapting Canaanite thought, forms, and imagery.
                   Baal was one of the Semitic deities whose cult penetrated to Egypt 
        in the 18th and 19 Dynasties.  The Pharoah Ramses II seems himself to 
        have affected Syrian cults.  Baal's most notable cult center in Egypt was 
        Baal Saphon, east of the Delta.  In Baal's conflict with Mot, the power of     
        drought and sterility,   Baal is a dying and rising god, the spirit of vegetation 
        which wilts and dies in the heat of summer but revives again with the winter 
        rains. 
                   On the death of Baal, his sister “the virgin Anat” ranges the moun-
        tains searching for him and makes the hills resound with her mourning.  
        Passages in Zechariah 12, Ezekiel 8, and Judges 11 use similar images.  
        There is also a ritual for the building of a house for Baal whose completion 
        coincides with the rain, thunder and lightning.  This ritual may have been 
        the prototype for the Hebrew Feast of the Tabernacles.  When Baal re-
        vives, he engages Mot in a great struggle and overcomes him.
                   In Judges period, the Hebrews tended to assimilate the Baal cult 
        without adapting it and at various later times, such as during the reign of 
        Ahab and Jezebel, there was a resurgence of Baal-worship.  The pro-
        phets, especially Hosea, preach against this materialistic nature cult, and 
        Hezekiah and Josiah suppressed it.  It is mentioned as still existing in the 
        early days of the exile and in the Persian period.

BAAL-BERITH  (בעל ברית, lord of covenant)  A god whose shrine and cult,  
        according to Judges 9, was at Shechem.  They both became popular in 
        Israel together with the worship of the local Canaanite fertility god Baal 
        after Gideon's death, although this probably applied only to the Israelites 
        in the vicinity of Shechem.
                   Shechem was a strong city which the Israelites dealt with through 
        agreement, rather than force of arms.  While the term “Baal” in “Baal-
        berith” doesn't have to be the Canaanite fertility god, in this case we pro-    
        bably have to visualize him as the local form of that god, in whose temple 
        an agreement had been made and was regularly ratified between the Is-
        raelites, who thought of this god as “covenant-lord,” and the people of 
        Shechem, who thought of him first as “Baal” and then as “covenant-lord.”

BAAL-GAD  (בעל־גד, baal of good fortune) A town near Mount Hermon mar-
        king the northern limits of Joshua's conquest.   It was in a valley, with  
        Mount Hermon on the east, and Mount Lebanon on the west.  The exact 
        site is unknown. 

BAAL-HAMON  (בעל המון, Lord of the abundance (wealth))  A place where 
        there was an especially fruitful vineyard of Solomon's.  The site is unknown, 
        and it may well be a place in poetic imagination.

BAAL-HANAN (בעל־חנן, Baal is gracious)  1. A king in Edom before the Isra-
        elite monarchy; son of Achbor.  He succeeded Shaul and was succeeded
        by Hadad.     2. A Gederite official under David; he was in charge of olive 
        and sycamore trees in the Shephelah.

BAAL-HAZOR  (בעל חצור, Baal of Hazor)  Possibly Absalom's mountain 
        home, probably located about 10 km northeast of Bethel.  Absalom invited
        the sons of David there, and had Amnon killed there.  It may have been the 
        site of an ancient Canaanite-Hebrew sanctuary.

                                  B-1

BAAL-HERMON (חרמון בעל, lord of Hermon) A city of the Hivites on the bor-
        der of Manasseh, which was untouched by Israelite conquest.   One theory 
        was that it was on top of the mountain; another is that it the same as Baal-
        Gad. 

BAAL-MEON (בעל מעון, lord of dwelling)  One of the names for a town in 
        northern Moab about 6.4 km south of Medeba.   It was assigned to the tribe
        of Reuben.  Around 830 B.C. it was in Moabite possession; Samaritan wri-
        ting shows it in Israelite possession around 772 B. C.

BAAL-PEOR (בעל פעורThe God of Mount Peor. While Israel was en-
        camped at Shittim, they “yoked themselves to the Baal of Peor,” and in-
        dulged in licentious worship rites with Moabites. In punishment, Israel
        was smitten with a plague.

BAAL-PERAZIM  (בעל פרצים, place of defeats) A place northwest of Jeru-
        salem, near the Valley of Rephaim where David defeated the Philistines 
        shortly after his being anointed king of Israel.

BAAL-SHALISHAH (בעל שלשה) A city or region perhaps southwest of 
        Shechem, the home of the man who came to Elisha at Gilgal with 20 
        loaves of barley and fresh ears of grain.

BAAL-TAMAR (תמר בעל, lord of the palm) An unknown place, perhaps only 
        prominent landmark, near Gibeah of Benjamin, where the Israelites as-
        sembled to fight in their last and successful assault.

BAAL-ZEBUB  (בעל זבוב, fly-god) A god of the Philistine city of Ekron, to 
        whom King Ahaziah of Israel sent an inquiry around 845 B. C. as to whe-
        ther he would live after falling from an upper chamber. Since it is difficult to 
        see why a god of pestilence would be consulted after a fall, speculation is 
        still widespread as to the actual meaning of the word.

BAAL-ZEPHON (בעל צפון, place of (the god) Typhon) A city near the coast 
        and station on the Exodus; the exact site is unknown. In Canaanite, the 
        word means Lord of the North; an Egyptian source identifies his role as a 
        sea- and storm-god.

BAALAH (בעלה, wife, lady) 1. An earlier name of Kiriath-jearim (Joshua 15).
        2.  A mountain on Judah's border (Joshua 15), probably about 8 km north-
        west of Khirbet el-Muqanna (Ekron)      3.  A village in the Shephelah dis-
        trict of Judah; formerly a part of Simeon (Joshua 15).

BAALATH (בעלת, mistress) A town included in the original territorial allot-
        ment of Dan, probably near Gezer, although the exact site is unknown. 

BAALBEK The Semitic name Baalbek is probably an allusion to the deity wor-
        shiped there, Baal of the Beqa'a. The Greek name was Heliopolis, “city of 
        the sun,” since Baal was identified with the sun-god. Its prosperous times 
        began during the reign of Augustus and continued for 2 or 3 centuries.
        Baalbek is now famous for its temple ruins. The most ancient temple was
        originally built for the West Semitic storm-god Hadad. Later it was dedica-
        ted to the sun-god cult and afterward to Jupiter. There was also a temple 
        to Dionysus, and a 3rd, round temple.   The emperors Antoninus Pius 
        (138-161 A.D.) and Caracalla (211-217 A.D.), the latter of whom gener-
        ously completed the temples of Baalbek, probably because his mother 
        was a Syrian lady.

BAALE-JUDAH (בעלי יהודה, Baals (or lords) of Judah) The same city as 
        Kiriath-Jearim.

BAALETH-BEER (בעלת בארlady of the well)  A city of Simeon, apparently 
        the shrine of a Canaanite goddess.  The site is unknown.

BAALI  (בעליmy lord, or my husband)  In Hosea, God rejects this term in 
        favor of Ishi (“my husband”), thereby rejecting the idea that God is simi-
        lar to the Canaanite Baal and only the power of Providence in nature.

BAALIM  (בעלים, Baals or lordsPlural of Baal, possibly a plural of majesty, 
        but probably various local forms of Baal.

BAALIS  (בעליסson of exultation)  A king of the Ammonites.  He sent Ish-
        mael to Gedaliah soon after the destruction of Jerusalem, hoping in the 
        process to take over some of devastated Judah.

                                        B-2
BAANA (בענהson of affliction)    1. Son of Ahilud; one of 12 commissioners 
        of Solomon in Northern Israel, along the northern border of Manasseh.      
        2.  Son of Hushai; one of 12 commissioners of Solomon, in the district of 
        Asher and Bealoth.      3. The father of Zadok, who participated in the re- 
        building of the walls of Jerusalem in the time of Nehemiah.

BAANAH (בענהson of affliction)  1.  One of the sons of Rimmon, a Benja-
        minite from Beeroth. With his brother, Rechab, he shared in the regicide 
        of Ishbosheth.   This was done to ensure the deceased Abner's plan for a 
        united kingdom under David, by eliminating his most dangerous oppo-
        nent.  When they fled to David's Judean court with Ishbosheth's head, 
        David had them summarily executed.
                   2.  A Netophathite; the father of Heled, who was part of the “30.”
                   3. One of the Babylonian exiles who returned to Judah, and per-
        haps shared the leadership with Zerubbabel.
                   4.  1 of those who set their seals to the covenant made in Nehe-
        miah’s time, perhaps the same as Baana 3.

BAARA  (בעראApparently a wife of Shaharim, a Benjaminite.

BAASEIAH  (בעשיה)  A Levite of the family of Kohathites; ancestor of Asaph
         the musician.

BAASHA (בעשאshort for “Baal hears” or “The sun is Baal”)  Son of Ahijah 
        from the tribe of Issachar. He was king of (northern) Israel (around 900-
        877 B.C.), the successor of Nadab, whom he murdered.
                   He reigned for 24 years at Tirzah; Tirzah continued as the capital 
        city until Omri became king.  Baasha gained the throne because of a mi-
        litary revolt against King Nadab, and because the concept of charismatic 
        leadership was still strong.  When Baasha attempted to fortify Ramah 
        near Jerusalem, Asa, king of Judah, “hired” Ben-hadad of Syria to har-
        ass northern Israel, thus forcing Baasha to withdraw.

BABEL (בבלconfusion)  The Hebrew form of the name Babylon.  In Gene-
        sis, after the flood, humankind came together to build a city and a tower 
        to reach the heavens, in order to unite them and prevent them from scat-
        tering.  God confused their language so they had to disperse.  The city 
        and tower were therefore called Babel.
                   The Tower of Babel is almost certainly the great ziggurat or state 
        tower of the Marduk temple.  We have the evidence of the temple's mea-
        surement and its ground plan through archaeology.   In spite of this, 
        there are many open questions about the tower's appearance.  The story 
        in Genesis would seem to have been inspired by the tower at a period 
        when that great monument was in ruins between 2 rebuilding periods. 

BABYLON:  Old Testament; בבלAn ancient capital city of Mesopotamia.  
        Its ruins are situated on a Euphrates' branch, near the modern town of 
        Hilla, southwest of Baghdad.  We had no reliable, overall picture of the 
        city until the Germans did a series of excavations from 1899 to 1918.  
        The high water table makes it difficult to dig very deep, so the beginnings
        of the city in the early 2000s B.C. remains unknown. 
                   The earliest mention of the city is possibly around 2500 B.C. as 
        “Babilim,” which means “the gate of the god.”  It is mentioned again in the 
        3rd Ur Dynasty as a provincial capital and the governor's seat.  Later it be-
        came the capital of a small independent kingdom of Amorite descent un-
        der Sumu-abum.   Under Hammurabi, Babylon extended its sway over 
        most of southern Mesopotamia, but under his son Samauiluna, the king-
        dom's southern part was lost to the Sea Land kings.   The end of the dy-
        nasty came shortly after 1600 B.C., with a Hittite raid on Babylon.
                   It was captured and partially destroyed by the Assyrian ruler Tu-
        kulti Ninurta (1235-1198 B.C.), but it recovered.  When the Assyrians' Ti-
        glath-pileser III (746-727) and Sargon II (722-705) subdued southern 
        Mesopotamia, Babylon became a center of resistance, so much so that 
        Sennacherib (705-681) felt forced to destroy the city; his son Esarhad-
        don rebuilt the city.
                   Shamashshumukin served as regent in Babylon, while his brother 
        ruled in Asshur.  A rebellion by Shamashshumukin led to a severe siege of 
        Babylon, in which Shamashshumukin burned himself to death in his pa-
        lace.   In 608 B.C., the Assyrian Empire fell, and Babylon, which had been
        prime mover, entered upon its most glorious period as of the Neo-Baby-
        lonian Empire's capital.  Under Nabopolassar and Nebuchadrezzar II (605-
        562), vast program of public building and fortification was carried out.

                                  B-3
 
                   When this empire fell to the Persians, Babylon open its gates to Cy-
        rus in 539 B.C. without opposition.  When the Persian Empire fell to Alex-
        ander the Great, Babylon again offered no resistance.  Alexander's succes-
        sor Seleucus I (Nicator) founded Seleucia on the Tigris nearby, which led 
        to slow but steady transfer of Babylon's population, until by the Christian
        era only astronomers and mathematicians still lived in the city.
                   Babylon formed a slightly squeezed rectangle straddling the Euphra-
        tes River, covering an area of approximately 4 square km., with the long 
        side of the rectangle running northeast to southwest.  The larger area east 
        of the river constituted the older part of the city, with the royal palace and 
        the main temples.   The area west of the river was the “new city.”  2 impo-
        sing walls enclosed the rectangle; the inner wall was about 6.8 meters in 
        width, while the outer was 3.5 meters.  Outside the latter ran a water-filled 
        defensive ditch.  There were towers at about 20 meter intervals. 
                   Access to the city was through ramps across the ditch and gates in
        the double walls.  The Ishtar Gate was in the eastern part of the northern 
        wall. Nebuchadnezzar II constructed a new double wall further out to the 
        south and east in order to prevent arrows from reaching the inner wall.  
        There was also a system of artificial lakes and flooded areas that was esta-
        blished to the north and east outside these walls. Visitors from the north 
        would 1st pass Nebuchadnezzar's outer fortification line and a “Summer 
        Palace” just inside them.  Just before the Ishtar Gate, they would have 
        passed a second large palace to their right and a similar structure, thought
        of as an “armed camp” on their left.  
                   Approaching the Ishtar Gate, they would see an arched entry 
        around 4.8 meters wide and perhaps 9.7 meters high, with massive square 
        towers on each side.  The towers and gate were faced with lapis-lazuli blue 
        tiles and decorated with rows of bulls and dragons in colored relief.  They 
        then crossed a broad, 32 meter gate room to a second larger gate, again 
        flanked by 2 massive towers which were larger than the first pair and with-
        out reliefs.   Finally, they would emerge on the processional street Aibur-
        shabu, which led due south through the city.
                   Immediately inside the city on their left was a temple for goddess 
        Ninmakh; to their right was the largest of the 3 palaces they would have 
        seen so far.  This palace had three major units; the one nearest the street 
        contained the official reception suite of the king, with throne room, and a 
        broad hall on the south side of a large court.  There are unusually solid and 
        heavy walls in part of this unit, which have been interpreted as the founda-
        tions for the famous “Hanging Gardens of Babylon.”  
                   West of this part of the palace, one entered the second unit of the 
        palace, which has been interpreted as the living quarters of the king.  Still 
        farther west was the third unit of the palace, interpreted as the harem, the 
        part of the palace which accommodated the royal family.  A section of pri-
        vate homes was located a little further south on the left side of Aibur-
        shabu.   For the most part, they were 1-story high, with no windows facing 
        west and only one door facing the street.
                   Going south along Aibur-shabu, one reached on the right the walls 
        of the complex Etemenanki, with pillars as part of the wall.  This complex 
        had the ziggurat of Babylon.  Turning right at the southeast corner of Ete-
        menanki, and going down toward the river, the visitors would see Eteme-
        nanki on their right and the Marduk temple Esagila on their left.
                   Esagila's entrance was in its eastern wall.  A gate at the far wes-
        tern end of the forecourt opened into the main unit of the temple.  The 
        main court had rooms on the north and south walls and a monumental gate 
        at its west end.   There was a smaller room and then a main room entered 
        through a door in the middle of the long side, opposite of the dais on 
        which Marduk's image was placed.  The room's decorations were lavish in 
        the extreme; roof beams were covered with gold and silver, and the walls 
        were covered with gold.   Herodotus estimates that some 800 talents 
        (25,000 kg) of precious metals went into the furnishings.
                   The street which ran from Aibur-shabu between Esgalia and Eteme-
        nanki down to the river, led to a bridge which connected the eastern and 
        western parts of the city.  The bridge rested on six boat-shaped pillars of 
        baked bricks laid in bitumen.  The deck of the bridge was wooden planks 
        which were taken up every evening so that the city inhabitants of one part 
        could not cross over by night and steal from those on the other side.
                   Written records fully confirm Babylon's reputation's as a great and
        wealthy city of lavish splendor.  Nothing in the records sheds light on its 
        reputation for moral laxity.  It may be remembered that the biblical tradition 
        is of a necessity a hostile tradition, both because of religious conviction and
        the harsh treatment of the Jews by Babylonian rulers.  Neither would en-
        dear the city to biblical writers. 
                   New Testament Babylon1.  The eastern city and kingdom into
        which the people of Israel and Judah had been taken captive.  Memory of  
        this captivity kept 2 themes alive for early Christians.  1st, the captivity 
        was God's punishment for the people's sins of idolatry and disobedience; 
        and 2nd, Babylon the haughty empire would itself be destroyed by God.
        Babylon represented both the place and the time of this exile.  The move-
        ment of Israel from David to slavery is reversed by the movement from sla-
        very to the son of David, or the Christ.

                                            B-4    

                    2.  The ancient Babylon used as the archetypal head of all en-
        trenched worldly resistance to God.  Here, she is a harlot riding the beast, 
        ruling many kingdoms, corrupting kings, drunk with the blood of saints and 
        martyrs, the mother of all harlots.  As such, she is the antithesis of the vir-
        gin bride of Christ, the holy new Jerusalem.  Her power over God's people 
        was granted by God, but she was subject to great desolation.  The sin and 
        doom of Babylon is revealed from heaven, in spite of its disguise in earthly 
        prosperity and power. 
                   Rome is Babylon for the prophet of Revelations.  In the events of 
        his own day, the church was being tried and corrupted, he perceived both 
        the idolatries and Babylon's sure doom.   In thinking of Rome in these 
        terms, the prophet adopted an idiom which was current among Jewish 
        seers.   When he speaks of writing from Babylon, he assumes that his 
        readers will understand that the city which Romans call Rome is really a 
        manifestation of the age-old domain of idolatry.   But the Babylon of the 
        prophet isn't just Rome, but is wherever idolatry is dominant; it is the king-
        dom of that beast which has corrupted and enslaved mankind.  Babylon is
        the end-of-time symbol of satanic deception and power and is not to be re-
        duced to one earthly place. 

BABYLONIA  See Assyria and Babylonia

BACA, VALLEY OF (עמק הבכא (‘ay mawk  ha ba ka), valley of the balsam 
        trees)  A Palestinian valley the name of which was probably taken from a 
        tree species which oozed gum.  No valley of such a name has yet been 
        identified, so this valley may be symbolic.  On the other hand the valley of
        Rephaim has the balsam trees in question.  The valley was on a forbid-
        ding route leading to Zion (Jerusalem)

BACKSLIDING  (משובהשובב (mesh oo baw, sho bawb); apostasy, back-
        turning)  A prophetic term, almost exclusive to Jeremiah and Hosea.  It has 
        covenantal association.  Israel as the wife of Yahweh has proved unfaith-
        ful, not just with religious apostasy, but with moral apostasy—a forgetting, 
        or rejection, of the ordinances of the Lord.  People, prophets, and priests 
        together were guilty.

BAG (1. ריטח (kha reet), purse  2. כיס (keece), purse  3. צרור (tser ore),     
        purse    4.צור  tsore)    5. כלי (kel ee)    6. Phra (peh ra))    
                   1.) Used for money bags in II Kings, and “handbags” in Isaiah. 
        2.) Used several places for a bag or pouch used for weights.     3.)  Used 
        several places to describe a cloth drawn together in a bundle, to hold 
        money or other things.      4.)  Used in II Kings as a verb “to tie up in bags.” 
        5.) Used several places to describe a grain bag, a food sack, a grape con-
        tainer, or a shepherd's bag.      6. )  Used in 1st 3 gospels, to describe a 
        traveling bag, a shepherd's bag, or a beggar's bag.  

BAHURIM (בחורים) A village east of Mount Scopus near Jerusalem, where
        Paltiel and Michal parted. Shimei cursed David here, as David fled from 
        Absalom. Jonathon and Ahimaaz when they were spying for David hid in 
        the well of a man of Bahurim.  Azmaveth, one of David's mighty men, was 
        probably from here.  

BAJITH (הבית, the house)  In King James it is a Moabite place name; In the 
        Revised Standard Version, the Hebrew is changed so that it is translated 
        as “the daughter.”    

BAKBAKKAR (בקבקר, searcher, abundance of the mountains)  A Levite of 
        the sons of Asaph in Jerusalem.

BAKBUK (בקבוק, flask) Head of a family of postexilic, lower ranked temple 
        servants.

BAKBUKIAH (בקבקיה, abundance of YahuA singer and guard of the temple 
        store house; possibly a son of Heman, who founded 1 of 3 classical groups
        of singers.

BAKERS' STREET (חוץ האפים (khoots ha o phim)) In ancient Jerusalem, it 
        was natural for a group of craftsmen to develop in a specific area. Bakers' 
        street was presumably located toward the northwest angle of the city near 
        a tower called the Tower of the Ovens; probably the bakery was part of the   
        dwelling. Today in Jerusalem there are numerous bakeries between the 
        Damascus gate and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

                                B-5

BAKING (אפה (‘aw faw), to bake) The Hebrew root word and those coming 
        from it refer specifically to baking bread and cakes prepared with flour 
        and oil.   This was a substantial portion of the daily food of the Canaanites 
        and the Hebrews.   The abstaining from leaven in the dough was prompted 
        either by reason of necessity, such as baking in a hurry, or by rules of the 
        ritual.   Travelers, however, baked flat cakes of coarse bread on pebbles 
        upon which a fire had been built and the embers swept away. 
                   The feudal landlords in Canaanite Palestine used to draft maidens 
        as bakers; Israelites feared the same from their kings.   In Egypt, the chief 
        baker at the royal court seems to have been a personage of great impor-
        tance.   Biblical references to the art of cooking are few and not explicit. 
        The use of bronze or iron forks for the preparing and serving of meat is 
        attested to by archaeology.   The sacrificial meals for the priests and cer-
       tain worshipers required that kitchen facilities be provided for in the pre-
        cincts of the temple.

BALAAM (בלעם, wasting of the people) A seer summoned by Balak king of 
      Moab to curse Israel before they entered Canaan. Balaam's place in the 
        Old Testament is unique as a foreigner who was subject to the command 
        of the God of Israel, and who acknowledged that his powers came from 
        the Lord. 
                   The career of this seer, who was unable “to go beyond the Lord's 
        word,” is an extraordinary example in the Old Testament of the spoken 
        word's potency.   It is also notable that a story set in the days of the Con-
        quest could be so free of warfare and bloodshed.  Balaam was summoned 
        to pronounce a destructive curse upon Israel, but instead he uttered a 
        series of blessings.   Then, too, there is the well known tale of Balaam's 
        ass; the only other place a talking animal was used biblically was in the
        Garden of Eden.
                   The apparent inconsistency in first authorizing Balaam's trip to 
        Moab and then blockading the road before his ass is explained as the 
        result of combining and editing different versions of the story together.   In 
        the Elohwist's version, God agreed to a second embassy, and Balaam 
        was allowed to return with the Moabite princes.   In the Jahwist's version, 
        Yahweh's opposition to Balaam's journey was revealed to Balaam en-
        route.   The reason for Yahweh's opposition to Balaam's journey is no lon-
        ger clear.
                    Once Balaam arrived in Moab, preparations were made to have
        him utter the powerful curse which would greatly diminish Israel's threat
        to Moab.   The first attempt backfired, producing praise of Israel instead of 
        a curse.   3 other attempts from different vantage points produced results
        similar to the first.   The 4 Balaam poems have resulted from the inclusion 
        of materials originally preserved in separate versions.   Movement of Ba-
        laam from height to height seems to be a way to incorporate all 4 poems 
        into the saga.   2 poems are from the Elohwist version, and 2 are from the 
        Jahwist version.
                   The poems resemble the Jacob's deathbed blessings without the 
        tribal allusions.   The imagery suggests both the return of Paradise with its
        peace and bounty, an the triumph of Israel over its foes, reflecting a con-
        cern to affirm both the goodness and power of God.   If the poems are re-
        flections of David's conquering of Moab and Edom, then the original form 
        of the poems would be in the 900s B.C.   The poems' regal references 
        could be only slight modifications of ancient Semitic poetry which Israel
        heard during its own monarchy.
                   The present form of the tradition locates Balaam's home in the Eu-
        phrates Valley. Such a long journey implies the need for something more 
        than the ass and 2 servants of the Jahwist version.  In this version Ba-
        laam's homeland was perhaps located 1 or 2 days journey from Moab, 
        perhaps in Edom or in Ammon.   Later biblical references to Balaam are
        unfavorable.  His journey to Moab is considered motivated by base desire 
        for gain, and he is blamed for Israel's defection to a Moabite baal. 

BALADAN (בלאדןThe father of Merodach-baladan king of Babylon. 

BALAH (בלהold, worn out) A city of Simeon in Judean Negeb. The biblical 
        context suggests an area South and East of Beersheba, but the precise
        location is unknown. 

BALAK (בלקthe devastator) Son of Zippor; king of Moab. He asked Balaam
        to curse the Israelites after becoming fearful of them. Baalam refused 
        and Balak was then defeated through Yahweh's saving action. 

BALANCES (מאזנים (mo tse na eem ) The balance was used to measure
        weights.   Two pans were suspended by cords from a beam.   The beam 
        was suspended by a cord in its center.   Before the Romans, all balances 
        in the Near East were equal armed and the principle of leverage wasn't 
        used.

                                     B-6 

                   In the Bible, just balances are prescribed and false or deceitful ba-
        lances are denounced.  The Egyptians used balances in transactions, and
        as symbols of passing judgment in the afterlife.  There are scenes in which
        the heart of the one being judged before the gods is in the balance against 
        the ma'at feather, the emblem of truth.  In Mesopotamia, the hand balance
        gave opportunity for cheating.  Balances were well-known in Canaan be-
        fore the Israelites' coming. 

BALD LOCUST (סלעם (so lawm), swallower, consumer) An insect considered 
        clean and therefore edible. 

BALDNESS (גבחת (gab bakh ath), baldness of the forehead; קרחה (kor 
        khaw) baldness (from mourning or enslavement)) Complete loss of hair 
        from the head was probably not common among biblical peoples; it's 
        mentioned infrequently in the Old Testament and not at all in the New Tes-
        tament.
                   The term “baldness of the forehead” appears only where the law
        states that such baldness is unclean only if the signs of leprosy appear. 
        “Baldness” was a term of derision applied to Elisha.   The Hebrews were
        forbidden to make themselves bald by shaving, doubtless because neigh-
        boring peoples did so.   The shaving of the head and the hair's ceremonial 
        burning at the termination of the Nazirite vow was practiced.  The priests 
        forbid it and the prophets mention it, but probably didn't approve the rite of
        baldness as a sign of mourning.   It is unlikely that the rite was common, 
        and the priest allude to it only in order to point out impending doom and en-
        slavement, where baldness is produced by carrying burdens on the head.

BALL (דור (dure)The single biblical reference to a ball was in the deposition 
        of Shebna, Hezekiah's royal steward. The prophet Isaiah said to Shebna: 
        “The Lord will seize firm hold on you, and whirl you round and round and  
        throw you like a ball into a wide land (i.e exile in Assyria).”   (Isaiah 22). 

BALLAD SINGERS  (משלים (ma she la eem) those who use metaphors (i. e. 
        poets))  word that refers to makers or repeaters of proverbs used in bal-
        lads or folk songs. 

BALM  (צרי, (tsor ee))  The true identity of this aromatic resin or gum is not  
        easily established; it is mentioned six times in the Bible.  Sources outside 
        the Bible indicate areas near Jericho and the Sea of Galilee as places the 
        shrub which yielded the resin grew, but biblical references do not support 
        the idea that balm trees grew in the rugged highland areas southeast of 
        the Sea of Galilee. 

BALSAM (בכא (ba ka)) The word appears as a place name in Psalm 84. The 
        true balsam trees never grew around Jerusalem, but were native to Sou-    
        thern Arabia.   There is no agreement as to which local tree is indicated. 
        It could be that the Hebrew does not refer to a tree at all. 

BALTHASAR (Balqasar) In late tradition an Arabian king and 1 of 3 Magi. 

BAMAH (במה, high place, hillock, usually for worship) A word used for:
        a) Gilboa hill and of mountains above Arnon.      b) dominion of Israel  
        and of God in figurative phrases.      c) devastation in figurative phrases.      
        d) contemptuous but obscure purpose in Ezekiel as an artificial word.      
        e) places of worship on natural heights and artificial mounds. 

BAMOTH (במות, high places) A stopping place of the Israelites in Trans-jor-
        dan near Nahaliel, probably short for Ramoth-Baal. 

BAMOTH-BAAL (במות בעל, high places of Baal) A Moab town. Balak took 
        Balaam here, from which Balaam saw the nearest Israelite; it was a Baal 
        sanctuary and assigned to Reuben’s tribe.  Beth-bamoth is probably 
        Bamoth-baal.

BAN (בדל (ba dal)) In the New Testament, the idea of banning refers to 2 re-
        ferences.
                   1st, it has to do with the proscription of those who confessed 
        Christ from the synagogues.   John’s Gospel refers 3 times to Christians 
        being driven out from synagogues.   It was a practice which was probably 
        in use in John's time at the end of the 100s A.D., but which certainly does 
        not go back to the earlier times.

                                   B-7

                   2nd, it has to do with the expelling of impenitent Christian sinners 
        from the church. Deliberate offenders were banned from the church by 
        virtue of the apostles' power of binding and loosing.   A church member 
        who committed some offense and refused to listen to 2 or 3 brethren was 
        to be treated as one who is excluded from church fellowship and to whom 
        the gospel of salvation must be preached anew.  Thus, “to ban” does not 
        simply mean “to condemn”; it was a measure taken in view of the final 
        welfare of the banned person. 

BAND (1.) אסור (‘ay soor); 2.) ﬨשפ (sef eth); 3.) גדוד (ghed ood)) 1. Any-
        thing with which a person is bound, as a shackle.   Metaphorically, it is the 
        oppression of an enemy, which acts as a restraint.      2. Anything which 
        encompasses another thing or person; flat strip or border.     3. Group of 
        persons brought together by common purpose or character apart from tri-
        bal relationship. 

BANDAGE (1.) אפר (‘af ayr);   2.) קתול (khit tool);  3.) Keiria (key ree ah))  
        1. A covering placed over the eyes to conceal one's identity.     2. A wrap-
        ping for a broken arm.      3. A swathing band for burial. 

BANDS, MAGIC (כסתות (keh sa tote)) Objects connected with divination and  
        probably used as magic charms to “bind” people and ward off evil.

BANI  (בני, build)    1.  A man of Gad and a warrior among David's “Thirty.” 
        2.  An ancestor of family line of Ethan, a Mararite Levite in David's time. 
        3.  An ancestor or family line of Uthai, a Judahite in postexilic Jerusalem. 
        4.  The founder of or the name for a family group included in the great list 
        of those who returned from the Exile.       5.  Several married foreigners.
        6.  Representatives of this group probably came with Ezra from Babylonia. 
                   7.  Representatives of  this group set their seal to the covenant.    
        8.  representative of this group is included among those who assisted 
        Ezra in teaching law to the people.      9.  The father or family line of Uzzi 
        who is described as overseer of the Levites in Jerusalem.    10.  The father 
        or family line of Rehum, a Levite who prepared a section of the Jerusalem 
        wall and perhaps one of those listed in 5-8 above.    11.  A Levite who took 
        part in the celebration of the Feast of Tabernacles at the time of Ezra.        

BANISHMENT  Condemnation to exile.  Since, to an Israelite, exile from one's 
        land meant being cut off from Yahweh, or perhaps even being forced to 
        worship idols, biblical law never prescribes it as a legal penalty. 
                   Voluntary exile was the last resort of hunted people (e.g. Jacob 
        flees to Haran, Moses to Midian, and David to Gath.).  Taking asylum in 
        another country was commonly practiced by political refugees in the an-
        cient Near East.  The enforced stay of the accidental manslayer in the city 
        of refuge may be considered banishment.
                   Roman law knew several forms of exile, from the severe deportio, 
        which was perpetual and involved confiscation and loss of citizenship, to 
        the milder relegatio where a person was excluded from residence in a cer-
        tain place, for a definite or indefinite period of time.  A very common form 
        was relegatio in insulam, which was inflicted on the author of Revelation.

BANKING  The development of international trade in antiquity made it impera-
        tive that some method of banking be devised.  During the historical period 
        covered by the Old Testament writings, all banking operations were per- 
        formed by landowners, merchants, and traders.  There were no professio-
        nal bankers before the Greek culture came to the Middle East.  The ex-
        change of currencies was not part of a banker's operations.  There were, 
        however, specialized moneychangers.

BANNER (אות (‘oath), sign; דגל (deh gel), banner; משאת (mas ayth), 
        raised beacon; נס (nace), flag, banner)  Either a standard of a tribe or 
        troops or a rallying or warning signal of some kind.
                   Nothing is known concerning the nature of tribal standards.  
        Joshua's javelin is represented as something necessary to safeguard the 
        community in the account of the conquest of Ai.  A divine standard is im-
        plied in the name Moses gave to an altar in Exodus.  Banners were used 
        as signals to rally an army, and they would be set on a hill and accompa-
        nied with the sounding of a trumpet. 
                   Standards for army troops were common among the Egyptians, 
        Babylonians, Assyrians, Hittites, Persians, and Romans.  The eagle was 
        known to be used as far back as the 2000s B.C.  Army standards were 
        commonly animal figures such as stags, steers, wolves, unicorns, serpents 
        lions, horses.  The Assyrians used the moon sickle mounted on a spear.  
        The eagle became for imperial Rome the official standard of the legion; but 
        the wolf, unicorn, horse, and boar were all early standards. Under the em-
        perors, standards became cultic symbols bearing the image of the emperor, 
        and were therefore detested by the Jews.

                                    B-8

BANQUET (משתה (mish teh), drinking)  The consumption of wine and rich 
        foods was the chief feature of the banquet in biblical times. Banquets were 
        held at the arrival of a stranger; on a birthday; when a child was weaned; 
        after the sheep shearing; at the grape harvest; after the completion of a 
        building; when a treaty was ratified; and at a wedding.

BAPTISM (baptismaA rite using water as a symbol of religious purification.  
        In the New Testament, it is the rite practiced by the John the Baptist, and 
        the Christian rite which, after Pentecost, was the regular means of initiation 
        into the Christian community.
                  Origins of Baptism—The roots of Christian baptism are to be found 
        within Judaism.  Jews were accustomed to use water for the purpose religi-
        ous purification and especially in proselyte baptism, one of the ceremonies 
        by which new converts were admitted to Judaism; it isn't mentioned in the 
        Old Testament (OT). It is probable that this baptism “wasn't an act of ritual 
        purification alone, but a self-dedication to the God of Israel, involving spi-
        ritual and physical factors with a fundamentally sacramental character.”  
                   It was probably an extension of proselyte baptism in “the 15th year 
        of the reign of Tiberius Caesar (29 A.D.), when John the Baptizer went by 
        the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of 
        sins."   (John's existence is confirmed outside of the Bible by Josephus.)
        But there are striking differences between proselyte baptism and John's
        baptism.  John administered it to Jews and Gentiles, and for John the 
        ethical significance of the rite became prominent.
                   The most striking thing about John's baptism is that it is linked with 
        the coming of the kingdom of God.  John's baptism is thus a rite of moral 
        purification. John contrasts his own water baptism with a future baptism, 
        “with the Holy Spirit and with fire.”  The Dead Sea Scrolls supports the 
        theory that the reference to the Holy Spirit was in the original version of 
        the gospel and not a later addition.  John's baptism prepared those who 
        submitted to it to face the coming Day of the Lord.
                  The Synoptic Gospel writers (i. e. Matthew, Mark, and Luke) record, 
        and the Gospel of John implies that Jesus accepted baptism at John’s 
        hands.  The earliest account suggests that originally the record came from 
        Jesus himself.  A scriptural passage with its origins in the earliest stages 
        of Christianity reveals that Jesus' ministry was connected with John‘s 
        preaching and baptism.  
                   In Jesus’ baptism, a rite with water is intimately linked with a revela-
        tion of the Holy Spirit and a unique consciousness of divine sonship.  The 
        voice Jesus heard at his baptism alludes to Psalm 2 and Isaiah 42 and at 
        least implies a reference to the Suffering Servant and a foreshadowing of 
        the Crucifixion.  Just as the baptism in Jordan launched the ministry in 
        Palestine, so the later “baptism” on Calvary launched a wider ministry, un-
        fettered by the earthly mission’s limits. 
                   New Testament (NT) Teachings—The baptism rite with water was
        practiced from Pentecost onward; it was the symbol of entry into the 
        Christian community.   It was closely linked with repentance and the Holy
        Spirit’s reception, and would seem to embody the gospel’s proclamation. 
        Water baptism’s continued use is remarkable because the originator of 
        Christian water baptism teaches that Holy Spirit baptism takes the place 
        of water baptism.   Sometimes the baptism is spoken of as “in the name of
        Jesus,” or “of Lord Jesus.”
                  The fullest NT expression of the meaning of baptism is found in the 
        letters Paul wrote.  Paul teaches that baptism is the means of incorpora-
        tion into the Christian community which is the Body of Christ, and explains 
        the connection of baptism with faith and sonship as a “putting on” of Christ.  
        In Romans, he answers the objection, “Are we to continue in sin that grace 
        may abound?,” by stressing the significance of their baptism, which Paul 
        sees as symbolic of dying to sin, being buried, and rising again with Christ.  
        Paul answers the false teaching at Colossae by asserting that Christ is all-
        sufficient for salvation and by an appeal to the significance of baptism, 
        which he sees as the Christian counterpart of Jewish circumcision. 
                   Other references to baptism in Paul's letters elaborate these ideas 
        further or guard against misunderstandings.  Paul's reference to baptism 
        all bring out that close link between baptism and the preached message of
        the gospel.  Jesus was most likely responsible for the idea of baptism as 
        “dying and rising with Christ.” But Paul did much to set it at the forefront of 
        normal Christian thinking.  According to Paul's teaching divine sonship, 
        possession of the Spirit, knowing God and doing God's will were all rea-
        lized blessings connected with baptism and with the age to come. 
                   The Christian gospel consisted of a partial realization of what were 
        future expectations in the OT.   The Gospel of John and the First Letter of 
        John each contain a passage of considerable importance for the under-
        standing of baptism:  “I say to you, unless one is born of water and the 
        Spirit, he can't enter the kingdom of God.”  Some think these words may 
        contain the nucleus of a genuine saying.  Here again the connection is to 
        be observed between baptism, sonship, and the Spirit.  

                                    B-9

                   John clearly links sonship with baptism, but he holds the Spirit’s 
        activity to be of equal importance.   The sacramental character of Johan-
        nine theology is clearly but less directly expressed than other NT writers.
        In John's time, some believed that Jesus was baptized but not crucified. 
        John asserts the historical reality both of his baptism in the Jordan and
        his death upon the cross. 
                   The purpose of baptism is also explained in Hebrews and the First 
        Letter of Peter.   Regeneration is referred to in the Letter to Titus, where 
        Jesus “. . . saved us, . . . by the washing of regeneration and renewal in 
        the Holy Spirit.”  Most likely this passage is an extension of the “birth from 
        above” concept, which is already linked in Johannine teaching with bap-
        tism and with the Holy Spirit's activity. 
                   Was Baptism Instituted by Jesus?—Both of the scripture passages
        which associate baptism with a command to preach the gospel, one at the
        end of Matthew and one at the end of Mark lack original authority, be-
        cause they may be later additions to the texts.  Even if the passage in Mat-
        thew isn't original, it reflects a conviction in certain Christian circles toward
        the end of the first century that baptism rested upon the authority of Jesus. 
        The fact that the rite of Christian initiation included baptism with water is 
        better understood if early Christians were justified in believing that rite res-
        ted upon the authority of Jesus. 
                   Such an authority for baptism is to be found, not in particular texts,
        but in Jesus' life and ministry as a whole, with emphasis on his baptism
        and death.   Certain passages in Acts make it clear that in early Christian 
        teaching, the beginning of the mission of Jesus was traced back to the 
        activity of John the Baptist; he was the prelude to and the forerunner of 
        Jesus and his preaching and baptism. 
                   Recent study of the events which led to Christian baptism has laid
        stress on the importance of Jesus' baptism.  Both in the baptism of Jesus 
        and in the Christian rite, a baptism with water is linked with the Holy Spi-
        rit's descentwith divine sonship, and with repentance.  Some Christians 
        found it hard to understand how Jesus could submit to a “baptism of repen-
        tance for the forgiveness of sins.”  This is resolved as we see Jesus corpo-
        ately setting himself alongside those to whom he came to minister.  He 
        could not separate himself from the sinners whom he would save. 
                   Notably, in Paul's letter, the Johannine writings, Hebrews and I 
        Peter, baptism is also connected with Christ's death.  If Christian baptism 
        is the proclamation of the gospel of salvation in action, then it is hardly 
        surprising to find that special stress is laid upon the death and resurrection 
        of Christ, which is the gospel's center.  This linking of baptism with Christ's 
        death is to be sought in Jesus' words: “I have a baptism to be baptized 
        with; and how I am constrained until it is accomplished." 
                   Thus, the authority for Christian baptism in the ministry of Jesus is 
        2-fold lying in both the water baptism and Jesus' death on the cross.   One 
        biblical scholar sees Jesus' death as what he terms a general or universal 
        baptism, which, lying as it does behind every individual act of Christian bap-
        baptism, gives the rite its significance and potency. 
                   Infant Baptism—There is no direct evidence in the NT for the bap-
        tism of infants. However, there is indirect evidence that infant baptism was 
        practiced in the early church during the NT period.  The analogy of prose-
        lyte baptism would encourage giving a Christian baptism to the children of 
        new converts. In regards to children of parents already Christians, the the-
        ory has been offered that as the early church diverged from Judaism, the 
        need was felt for some Christian counterpart to circumcision.  Paul may 
        have been instrumental in putting forward baptism as that Christian coun- 
        terpart.
                   The words of Polycarp at his martyrdom imply his baptism as an 
        infant. And Tertullian, while he deplores infant baptism, he does not use 
        what would have been his strongest argument, namely that the practice 
        wasn't primitive. Those who on grounds of faith and consciences oppose 
        infant baptism would set against this indirect evidence the NT's silence on 
        the subject.  Direct historical evidence of the NT is insufficient to settle the 
        question either for or against infant baptism; the case must be argued on 
        other grounds.

BAR  (a.) בד (bad);   b.) בריח (ber ee akh);   c.) מוט (mote))  Primarily a 
        piece of wood or metal used as a support, fastening, or barrier. 
                   a.) and c.)  Some of the uses in the Bible are for a bar of acacia 
        wood used to join frames in the superstructure of the tabernacle, a bar of 
        wood or metal used to secure a door or gate, or gold bars.
                   b.)  The interpretation of this word is difficult, but their function 
        seems to be to bond together the frames of the tabernacle's superstruc-
        ture.
                  It is probable that gates which were barred as a defensive measure 
        had more than one bar.  A city provided with high walls, gates, and bars 
        was secure, but the breaking of the bars was the sign the city had fallen.  
        A quiet and secure people felt no need of gates and bars.

                                 B-10
                                            
BAR-JESUS (BarihouV (bar yay sous)  A Jewish magician and false pro-
        phet at Paphos on Cyprus who became blind when Paul denounced him.

BAR-JONA (BaribbwnaV (bar yoh nasThe family name of Simon Peter 
        and one of the patriarchs of his family.

BARABBAS  (BarabbaV, son of the father)A man who according to all the    
        New Testament gospels was held in prison by the Roman authorities at the
        time of Jesus' trial.  Matthew calls him a notable prisoner, Mark and Luke 
        state that he had been arrested for insurrection and murder, perhaps as a 
        member of the Zealots.   Pilate the Roman governor used to placate the 
        Jews at the time of a releasing one prisoners of their choice.   All 4 gospels 
        imply that the choice of a prisoner to be set free at this feast lay between 
        Jesus and Barabbas.   Urged on by Jewish leaders, the populace clamored 
        for Barabbas to be freed and for Jesus to be executed.

BARACHEL  (ברכאל, God blessed)  A Buzite; the father of Elihu, 1 of Job's 3 
        friends.

BARACHIAH  (BaraciaV)  The father of Zechariah.

BARAK  (ברק, lightning)  Son of Abinoam. Barak shared with the prophetess
        Deborah in the leadership of a Northern Israelite militia in a victorious cam-
        paign against Sisera.   In the prose narrative Deborah summoned Barak 
        from Kedesh in Naphtali to the seat of her judgeship in Mount Ephraim.   
        An oracle said that Barak should bring about the overthrow of the Canaa-
        nite oppression by raising some 10,000 men from Naphtali and Zebulun, 
        and await an engagement with the enemy at Mount Tabor.  
                   Sisera left his quarters at Harosheth-ha-goiim with his force of men 
        and 900 iron chariots to crush the rebellion, but the Israelites swept down 
        from Mount Tabor, completely routing the Canaanites.  Sisera fled, was 
        granted asylum by Jael, who slew Sisera while he slept.  Barak is included 
        among the judges who liberated Israel from her oppressors in the valedic-
        torian address of Samuel.

BARBARIAN  (BarbaroV )  The Greek word was originally an imitative 
        word—like “dingdong” of bells; “twitter” of birds, or “yack-yack of speech.”
        A barbarian is a person who utters a sequence of nonsense sounds.   
        Greek might speak of a Hebrew as a “barbarian,” a Hebrew might speak 
        of a Greek as a “barbarian,” and neither mean anything more than that the 
        other spoke differently, that they were a “foreigner,” without any sense of 
        aversion or hostility.  One may generalize and say that all dominant peo-
        ples in antiquity called those who spoke a different language barbarians.
                   But the Greek was a proud person and the Greek language and 
        culture was pervasive throughout the Mediterranean region; it was inevita-
        ble that "barbarian, like “foreigner” among us should quickly assume an 
        air of contempt.   The Persian Wars made clear to the Greek their culture's
        superiority to that of the barbarians; the barbarian was now ignorant and 
        untrained, crude, brutal, and unpolished.   Orientals possessed intelligence 
        without courage and the Northerners courage without intelligence.  Yet, not 
        all Greeks held so hardened a position.   Eratosthenes, for example says  
        that it would be better to make such division according to good qualities 
        and bad; many Greeks are bad, and many barbarians are refined.
                   In the book of Acts, the word simply means “foreigners.”   The 
        Greeks find the natives' kindness unusual; this may reflect the assumption 
        that “barbarians are inherently coarse, if not hostile.”  The way it is used 
        shows that the word carries ill will.   In Romans, “barbarians” takes on a cul-
        tural meaning, and is used in contrast with “Greeks,” which includes all 
        who embrace Greek culture.   “Barbarians” include everyone who doesn't 
        embrace Greek culture.  
                   In Colossians, “barbarian” represents non-Greeks, non-Jewish po-
        pulation, but in close association with human beings of the lowest and most
        degrading sort.  Paul's use of “barbarian” isn’t different from Philo’s or Jo-
        sephus’; what's different is his statement that in Christ “there can't be 
        Greek and Jew, circumcised and uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, 
        slave, or free man, but Christ is all, and in all.”
           
BARBER (גלב (gal lawb))  One who shaves or trims hair or beard. Barbers are 
        busy in all periods of the biblical story.   There is no evidence in the Bible 
        that the custom of shaving the head was religiously significant.

BARIAH (בריח, fugitive)  Son of Shemaiah in the Zerubbabel line of Davidic 
        descendants.

BARKOS (ברקוס, son of Kos (a god)?)  Head of a family of temple servants.

                                 B-11

BARLEY (שערים (seh o reem))  An important grain in Bible times, barley is 
        also mentioned frequently in the 1300s B.C. Ugartic documents.   Barley 
        ripened earlier than wheat; the harvesting of wheat begins about 2 weeks 
        later. Animals had barley in their diets as did poor humans, who baked it 
        into coarse loaves.  It was used as cereal offering and as a medium of ex-
        change; several species of barley are found in Bible lands.  Spring barley 
        was most common, with winter barley common in the Jordan Valley and the
        eastern plateau.

BARLEY HARVEST.  The reaping of barley grain; it began as early as late April 
        or early May, about two weeks before the wheat harvest.

BARN (מגורה (meg oo raw))  A storage place for seed or grain, and a sym-
        bol of prosperity when full, or famine when empty.

BARNABAS  (BarnabaV, son of encouragement)   An apostle of the secon-
        dary group, companion of Paul on his mission to Cyprus and Northeastern 
        Asia Minor.   Originally named Joseph, he probably acquired the name Bar-
        nabas because of his ability as a preacher.
                   Barnabas first appears in Acts, in Luke's account of the communal 
        living in Jerusalem.   He was a man of some means who gave a land sale's
        proceeds to the church.  He was also a Levite, a Cyprus native and some-
        one who embraced Greek culture.  Barnabas was part of the group of Jews 
        who embraced Greek culture and then moved back to Jerusalem.   Accor-
        ding to Acts, there was a large company of such Jews in the city at Pente-
        cost.   Barnabas was there to introduce Paul favorably to the Jerusalem 
        community.   He belongs to the company of first converts, who were won by 
        apostolic preaching, if not by Jesus himself.
                   Barnabas was one of the few “Greek” Jews who did not flee Jerusa-
        lem.  Though not a native, Barnabas had the confidence of the apostles.  
        Barnabas went over to Tarsus and brought back Saul to help at Antioch.  
        He was a “working” apostle, choosing to work for a living, as did Paul.  Bar-
        nabas seemed to start out as the head of a missionary journey, but in Cy-
        prus, Paul seems to take over leading the mission.  At Jerusalem, Barnabas 
        was in better standing than Paul and took the lead in reporting the work 
        done among the Gentiles.
                   Barnabas' separation from Paul began in Antioch after the Jerusa-
        lem conference.   Barnabas and Paul disagreed on whether to take John 
        Mark on another journey.   Mark had not stayed with them in the Cyprus    
        mission work.   Barnabas was devoted to Mark as a cousin and took him 
        on another mission to Cyprus, without Paul.   Not only that, but he had 
        shown a wavering, along with Peter, on associating with the Gentiles. 
                  The Christian spectrum was formed with Apollos, who thoroughly em-
        braced Greek culture on the extreme left, with Paul a little to the right of 
        Apollos.   Barnabas was near to the center, or just right of center, along with 
        Peter and the Jerusalem group.  On the extreme right were James and the 
        Judaizers.  The church that remained after Barnabas' time gives Barnabas 
        the role of writer.   But the books early Christian theologians credit him with 
        writing fit neither the conservative beliefs, nor the years in which Barnabas 
        lived.

BARRENNESS (עקר (‘aw kawr), sterile)  Barrenness was believed to be a 
        curse from God.  In the time of the end, so severe will be God's judgment 
        that people will call the barren woman blessed (Luke 23).  God in God's 
        mercy gives the barren woman a home and children (Psalm 113).  And the 
        nation is considered to be a barren woman, who will sing because of the 
        promise of children (Isaiah 54).

BARSABBAS  (BarsabbaV, son of the Sabbath, son of Saba)  1.  One of 
        2 candidates for the place left vacant by the defection of Judas Iscariot.  
        2.  Judas, sent by the Jerusalem church with Paul, Barnabas, and Silas 
        after the church council.

BARTHOLOMEW (BarqolomaiaV (bar thol oh mah ee as), son of Talmai).
        One of the 12 apostles.       
                   Bartholomew may not have been this apostle's full name, but we 
        can't be sure he was not simply known as Bartholomew.  The order of the 
        names in the gospel lists, lead some to equate the Bartholomew of the 
        first three gospels with the Nathanael in the Gospel of John, as they both 
        appear after Phillip.   Nathanael may not be a historic personage, but a 
        symbolic construction by which the writer depicts Judaism's incomplete-
        ness without Jesus Christ.  Church tradition makes Bartholomew a missio-
        nary to Armenia, Phrygia, Lycanonia, Mesopotamia, Persia,and India, and 
        explains his death in divergent ways.  In India, he is said to have left be-
        hind Matthew's Gospel in Hebrew.  He is also said to have evangelized 
        with Philip and Thomas.

                                  B-12

BARTIMAEUS  (BartimaioV, possibly son of Timai, or son of the unclean.)  
        A blind beggar of Jericho healed by Jesus, the account of which is in the 
        Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.   Mark's details seem to come from 
        an eyewitness.  Bartimaeus', faith and thankfulness, and Jesus' sympathe-
        tic response are noteworthy.
 
BARUCH  (ברוך, blessed)  Jeremiah's secretary; a member of a prominent 
        Judean family.   Baruch wrote the oracles of destruction for Jeremiah.  
        They were read publicly first, and then were read to and destroyed by King 
        Jehoiakim in angry contempt.  Baruch was then commanded by Jeremiah 
        to record the oracle again.   Parts of the Book of Jeremiah contain this ora-
        cle (Jeremiah 19, 21, and large portions of 26, 28, 29, 34, 36-45).   Baruch 
        also witnessed Jeremiah's purchase of an Anathoth field.  He was taken by 
        the leaders of the Judean remnant, along with the prophet, into Egypt.  Je-
        remiah speaks to this noble man's agony in pronouncing the nation's doom 
        by counseling him to stake his life on loyalty to the Lord rather than on the 
        dying kingdom.
                   Nothing else is known of Baruch.  His name was attached to the 
        apocryphal books of Baruch and the Apocalypse of Baruch, (See the en-
        tries in the Old Testament Apocrypha/ Influences Outside the Bible section
        of the Appendix.) both written long after his death. 

BARZILLAI  (ברזלי, heart of iron (morally strict))  1.  A Meholathite whose son 
        Adriel married Merab, daughter of Saul.      2.  An influential Gileadite of 
        Rogelim who, with 2 other wealthy patricians west of the Jordan, brought 
        generous supplies of food and equipment for David during Absalom's re-
        bellion.  When it was over he provided an honor guard to escort the mo-
        narch beyond the Jordan ford.  He declined David’s invitation to become 
        a royal court member; instead he proposed that his son Chimham be ac-    
        cepted instead.   Later, David commended to Solomon the sons of Barzillai
        as members of the royal court, because of his kindness.
                   3. A priest who married one of Barzillai the Gileadite's daughters. In 
         the postexilic period his descendants were not allowed to serve as priests, 
         because they could not prove their priestly descent.

BASEMATH  (בשמת, balsam or fragrance)    1.  A daughter of Elon the Hittite, 
        and a wife of Esau.  She was probably also a daughter of Ishmael, a sister 
        of Nebaioth.  She bore Esau's son Reuel, who had 4 sonsNahath, Zerah, 
        Shammah, and Mizzah.  These 4, along with 8 other descendants of Esau, 
        possibly make up a 12-tribe, loose confederation of Edom.    2. Solomon's
        daughter and wife of Ahimaaz, who administered for Solomon in Naphtali.

BASHAN  (בשן, fruitful, stoneless plain)  The northernmost of the parts into 
        which the region east of the Jordan was divided.  Bashan was bounded by 
        Mount Hermon on the north, Jebel Druze on the east, and the hills east of 
        the Jordan on the west.   It extended about 9 km south of the Yarmuk.  
        Most of it is a tableland which ranges from 1,600 to 2,300 feet in height.  It 
        was well adapted for wheat growing and cattle-raising, and was famous for
        its oak trees.   These natural features appear often in the Bible's poetry. 
        Archaeological exploration indicates the Bashan was continually occupied 
        from the Early Bronze period (3,200 to 2,100 B.C.).   Most of it was as-
        signed to the Manasseh tribe; it was a constant battleground between the
        forces of Israel and Aram.

BASIN Basin” and “Bowl” are often interchangeable words in the Bible.  Gene-
        rally the largest basin were banquet bowls, mixing bowls for wine, or ba-
        sins used in the sacrificial system (Actually, bowls of all sizes and varieties 
        were used in sacrifices).  Smaller bowls were used as tableware or wash 
        basins, where the water was poured over the hands or feet and a bowl col-
        lected the dirty water.   Bowls were even used to collect coals and ashes. 
        The smallest bowls became cups.

BASKET  ( a.) סל (sal);  b.) טנא (teh neh);  c.) כלוב (kel oob);  d.) דוד 
        (doo dah); e.) תבה (tay baw); f.) kojinoV (kof in os);  g.) spuriV 
        (spur ees))         
                a.)  a container for foodstuffs, such as baked goods, unleavened 
                    bread or meat.
                b.)  used for bearing the first fruits of the ground to priest.
                c.)  used for food such as summer fruit, but also may have been 
                    a net or cage for birds.
                d.)  a large woven container, used for figs, for bricks, mortar, and 
                    other heavy construction materials.
                e.)  probably a small chest made of bulrushes or papyrus and 
                    waterproofed  with tar so that it would float, such as the one in 
                    which the infant Moses was placed.

                                   B-13

                f.)  Specifically for the 12 baskets used to collect the leftovers of 
                    the 5,000.
                g.)  The word used for the 7 baskets used to collect the leftovers 
                    for the 4,000.   This type of basket is probably much larger than 
                    the basket for which the Greek word kofinos (f.) is used, as it 
                    was also probably the type of basket used to lower Paul down 
                    over the wall in Damascus.

BASTARD (ממזר (mam zare), mongrel people)  Bastards were not permitted 
        to enter Lord's assembly.  Ammon and Moab were hated as bastard peo-
        ples because of their incestuous origins.

BAT  (עטלף (‘at al lafe)Any of the order of nocturnal fruit-eating and insect-
        eating flying mammals.  In the Old Testament, bats are included in two lists 
        of unclean birds.

BATH  (בתBaqoV)  A liquid measure equal to the dry measure ephah.  From 
        estimates of what were probably measuring jars, it is thought that the bath 
        contained 21-23 liters (5 1/2 gallons).

BATH-RABBIM (רבים בתdaughter of a multitude)  A gate of Heshbon with 
        fish pools nearby.  When seen from a distance, it looked like the forehead 
        and cheeks framing the eyes of the beloved.

BATH-SHUA  (בת־שוע, daughter of Shua)  1.  The Canaanite wife of Judah 
        and mother of his sons Er, Onan, and Shelah.      2.  Alternate form of 
        Bathsheba. 

BATHING (רחץ (raw khats); apopoluw (ah po loo oh); baptizw 
        (bap ti zo))   The biblical languages don't distinguish between bathing and 
        washing, but between the methods used in washing clothes and washing 
        other objects.  People were washed by pouring water or dipping them in 
        water.  The Hebrew raw khats comes from the root meaning “to overflow.”
                   Palestine's dry climate discouraged bathing except where a stream 
        or pool was available.  Good grooming, especially for lovers, demanded 
        washing of face, hands, or body, before anointing.   During mourning or sor-
        row the face and garments were left unwashed.   A good host provided 
        water for his guest’s feet.   Washing feet as Jesus did in John 13 signified 
        humility.   Washing one's own hands, as Pilate did at the trial of Jesus, was 
        symbolic of innocence, and the semi-ritual washing of the hands before ea-
        ting had become a requirement by New Testament times.
                   Lambs were washed at shearing time, and babies after birth, but 
        ritual cleansing with water is mentioned more often than ordinary washing.  
        Persons polluted with many kinds of uncleanness, and personnel involved 
        in handling cleansing agents, had to wash their clothes, their bodies or 
        both.  Washing is an Old Testament metaphor for cleansing from sin.

BATHSHEBA  (בתשבעdaughter of abundance)  The wife first of Uriah the 
        Hittite, then of David.  Bathsheba later became the mother of Solomon.  
        She and Nathan persuaded David to proclaim Solomon king.

BATTALION  ( (spay rah))  The word used to translate the Latin 
        cohors, 1/10 part of a legion or 600.   A group of soldiers this size from the 
        2nd Italian Cohort was gathered together before Jesus, after Pilate han-
        ded him over to be crucified.

BATTERING RAM  (כר (kar))  An engine of war used by besiegers of a city to 
        break down its walls.
                   Its earliest known form comes from the Assyrians.  It consisted of a 
        heavy pole suspended at the middle from a framework which also served 
        to protect the rammers from stones and arrows.  They are mentioned as 
        part of the siege weapons of Babylon in the anticipated siege of Jerusalem.

BATTLEMENT  (טירה (tee raw))  A wall at a structure's top which alternated 
        openings to shoot through with walls to protect the defenders.

BAVVAI  (בויSon of Hernadad, a Levite who helped rebuild Jerusalem's 
        walls.

BAZAAR (חוצ (khoots))  A section of a street set apart for merchants.

BAZLITH  (בצלית, nakedness)  The founder of a family group included 
        among the Nethinim in the great list of those who returned from the 
        Exile. 
                                                            B-14                     

BDELLIUM  (בדלח (bed ho lakh))  It is quite uncertain what this is.  It has 
        been defined as a gum or resin, a precious stone or a pearl.

BEADS  (כומז (koo mawz))  Articles of gold jewelery.  The Hebrew word's 
        meaning is uncertain.

BEALOTH  (בעלותmistresses)    1.  A town in southern Judah, perhaps the 
        same as Baalath-Beer.     2.  A town in Solomon's 11th administrative dis-
        trict.  Its location is unknown. 

BEAM (מנור (maw nore), frame of a loom; גב, (gabe); כפים(kaw fece); 
        and כרתת (ka raw thoth) are all words used to describe the beams used 
        in building)  The warp-beam on the loom evidently was large.

BEANS  (פול (pole))  Beans were grown from very ancient times as a nutritious 
        food.  Beans were brought to David after he fled from Absalom.   In Ezekiel, 
        beans were combined with other grains in a coarse bread which symbolized     
        Jerusalem's siege.   The dried bean was winnowed like wheat; the green 
        pods were vegetables.

BEAR  (דב (dobe))  Palestine's bear was known in the Northern regions as late 
        as the early 1900s.  It subsisted on vegetables, fruit, and insects to a grea-
        ter extent than on flesh.  Bears were used as similes in many passages 
        (e. g. for a wicked ruler (Prov.28); for God lying in wait for prey (Lam. 3); 
        feeding together with a cow in the future age as a symbol of its peace 
        (Isa.11); a she-bear robbed of her cubs as a simile for human anger 
        (II Sam. 17)).  A bear's attack on David's flock points to David's prowess.
                   Bears play a minor role in the end-times.  In Daniel 7, the 2nd of the 
        beasts coming up out of the sea is a bear.  In Revelation 13, the bear 
        contributes only feet to John's creation; bears' feet, being large may signal
        the trampling down of all opposition.

BEARD  (זקן (zaw kawn), beard or age;  (saw fawm), lip or moustache)  Full 
        beards were common among the Hebrews, who considered their removal 
        an indignity.   Semites are often pictured wearing beards in ancient Near  
        Eastern art.  The Hebrews were forbidden to mar the edges of their beard 
        by cutting and priests were told not to shave off the edges of their beards.  
        The pulling of some hair from head and beard was a sign of mourning or 
        anger.  The shaving of the beard was synonymous with impending doom.

BEAST  (חיה (khah ee); בהמה (be hay mah); zwon (zoe on);  qhrion 
        (theh ree on)
                1. Animals are divided into clean and unclean; the former may be 
                    used as food, without the blood.
                2.  A wild and sometimes carnivorous animal which gets its food 
                    from God.
                3.  A domesticated animal which is subject to the law of firstlings 
                    as well as to the sabbath regulation; all sodomy is strictly for-
                    bidden, and provision for restitution of injury to them is found in 
                    Leviticus.
                4.  The beasts of John's Revelation The 1st is described as the 
        “beast that ascends from the bottomless pit,” which combines in itself the
        joint characteristics of the 4 beasts of Daniel's visionlion, bear, leopard, 
        and a 4th beast (“terrible, dreadful, exceedingly strong, ten horns, and out
        of the sea, etc.)  This beast represents the combined forces of all political 
        rule opposed to God as the earthly demonic messiah who imitates the true
        one.
                   The 2nd beast represents every pagan cult which exists for the 
        express purpose of granting religious sanction to any world power that is 
        opposed to God's sovereignty over his world.  In John's day, the world po-
        wer arrayed against God and his kingdom was the Roman Empire; The 
        might of Rome and the imperial cult were the 2 beasts. Together with the  
        Dragon, the 3rd beast, these 3 beasts form a sort of unholy trinity.

BEATEN GOLD  (שחוט זהב (zaw hawb  sa khut))  Thin sheets of gold, pro-
        duced by hammering and used for overlaying objects of baser metals.  The 
        golden shields of Solomon and the lampstands of the tabernacle were 
        made of hammered work of gold.

BEATEN OIL (שמן כתית (she men  kaw theeth))  The highest quality of oil, 
        used for the lamp in the sanctuary.  Beaten oil was made by crushing fully 
        ripe olives in a mortar.  Since it was produced without pressing, it was re-    
        garded as the purest and the best.  Oil produced any other way was con-
        sidered to be lower grade oil.

                                B-15

BEATEN SILVER  (סף מרקע (kes af  mer kaw))  Thin plates or leaves of 
        hammered silver, used along with gold leaf to overlay the wooden core of 
        an image.

BEATITUDES  The beatitude is a form of writing that starts with the word 
        “blessed” and is a declaration of praise for an individual regarded as an un-
        usual example of moral rectitude and piety, who can expect a reward from 
        God.
                   The Old Testament (OT) beatitudes begin with “happy” or “blessed” 
       (אשרי While they resemble certain OT beatitudes, the New Testament  
        (NT) ones stress the joy of participation in God’s kingdom on Judgment 
        Day, rather than rewards for this earthly life.  Beatitudes appear mostly in 
        Matthew and Luke, 7 times in the book of Revelation, 3 times in Romans, 
        and once in John’s gospel.  Important for an interpretation of the collection 
        of 9 beatitudes at the beginning of the Sermon on the Mount is a recogni-
        tion of this looking forward to Judgment Day rather than looking at the im-
        mediate rewards.  It is the coming of God's kingdom and not social and 
        moral improvement that will resolve all difficulties.
                   Paradox is used in these beatitudes.  Men who in no way appear to 
        be fortunate in the present, but rather appear to be unfortunate and suffe-
        ring are those declared blessed.  Matthew stresses the general situation in 
        which Jesus' followers of every age find themselves by having Jesus say 
        Blessed are the poor, etc. and and thus makes the beatitudes an appropri-
        ate introduction to his code for Christian discipleship.  Luke, on the other 
        hand, stresses the consequences of their behavior by having Jesus say 
        “Blessed are you,” in 4 beatitudes that are contrasted by 4 corresponding 
        woes.  See Beatitude section in Sermon on the Mount entry for comparison. 
                     The 9 beatitudes in Matthew suggest that 3 different types of beati-
        tudes have been brought together.  The 1st group includes those individu-
        als whose lot in life is evil: the poor; the mourners; and the hungry.  The 
        2nd group is those who show the proper attitude towards God: seekers of 
        righteousness, the merciful; and the pure in heart.  In the 3rd group, the 
        ambassadors of Jesus are singled out as individuals who undertake the 
        specific work of preaching the gospel, regardless of the personal conse-
        quences.  However difficult the present situation may be for those whom 
        others would regard as most unfortunate, God will soon resolve the ten-
        sions of their present situation and grant them the gifts of God's kingdom.

BEAUTIFUL GATE  (qura wraia (eh  thuh rah  eh  oh ray ee ah)  The 
        scene of the healing of a paralytic by Peter and John in the Temple.  Most 
        likely it was an Eastern gate fashioned of Corinthian bronze which opened 
        upon the Court of the Women. 

BEAUTY (Hebrew roots: יפה (yof ee); תפארה (tif eh reh); נעם (no am). 
        Greek wordwraioV (oh rah yos)). 
                   The above 3 Hebrew words are the ones most used in the Old Tes-
        tament (OT); the Greek word is the one most used in the New Testament 
        (NT).  Neither the OT nor the NT has any theory of the beautiful.   Instead 
        there is the description of many things as beautiful.  Many women of much 
        beauty are mentioned (e.g. Sarai, Rebekah, Rachel, Abigail, Abishag, Bath-
        sheba, both Tamars, Delilah's sister, Esther.  The fair sex does not have 
        matter all its own way.  The men includeAbsalom, Adonijah, Benaiah's 
        Egyptian, Daniel, David, Joseph, Saul, and Jonathon.
                     Parts of the body are singled out for special mention especially in 
        the Song of Songs (e.g. voice, neck, lips, hair and beards).  Also men-
        tioned are garments, garlands, and “crowns of beauty.” The natural scene 
        in Palestine is described in terms of the beautiful, as a whole and in its 
        various parts, as is Egypt and Tyre.
                   The OT in general shows a keen appreciation of the glory, and thus 
        of the beauty, of God in nature.   In God everything is beautiful in its time. 
        Jesus himself crowns this attitude with the words “Solomon in all his glory 
        . . .”  The figure of beautiful or fair words is applied to flattering and false 
        speech. 
                   The supreme expression of Israel's capacity for beauty is certainly 
        in her gift of language, whether it be narrative, the moving force of prea-
        ching, or the lyrical outpourings of psalmists and prophets.  Then too, 
        Jesus' descriptive capacity in the parables reveals a beauty of diction 
        never surpassed.  And the passages dealing with Judgment Day abound 
        in references to what is beautiful.   The final word must be accorded to 
        the beautiful thing the woman did when she anointed Jesus in preparation 
        for his burial.
                                     B-16

BECHER  (בכר, young camel)    1.  The 2nd son of Benjamin.  The genealo-
        gical list ascribed to Benjamin must originally have belonged to Zebulun, 
        now strangely missing from I Chronicles.  The Benjamite Becher must 
        have been added to the list after it had been detached from Zebulun. 
        2. An Ephraimite, enumerated in the list of the second census taken by 
        Moses.

BECORATH  (בכורת)  The father of Zeror; an ancestor of King Saul.
BED (יצוע (yaw tsoo ah), מצע (mats tsaw), what is spread out; מטה (mit 
        taw), place of reclining; משכב  (mish kawb), lying down place; klinh    
        (klee nay), koith (koy tay), krabbatoV (krab bat os)).
                   The various terms for bed cited above appear to be used loosely 
        without any clear distinction in meaning.  Most beds would be placed on 
        the floor, or sometimes on a low ledge along a wall.  The beds of the well- 
        to-do were undoubtedly articles of furniture in keeping with their standard 
        of living.
                   Beds were used for sleeping at night, for love-making, for royal sul-
        king, and for convalescence from a wound or injury.  Beds were also used 
        in acts of private devotion.  In proverbs, beds are used in reference to an 
        individual's death in Job 17 and Psalm 139 (“making one's bed in Sheol”) 
        or as a figure for an intolerable situation in Isaiah 28 (a short bed).

BED (GARDEN) (ערוגה (‘ar oo gah), raised up A level piece of ground in a 
        garden; it is always used as a figure of speech, and is found in Song of So- 
        lomon and Ezekiel.

BEDAD (בדד)  The father of the Edomite king Hadad.

BEDAN (בדן)  1.  The name of a Manassite.      2.  A name in I Samuel 12, 
        with several different interpretations.

BEDEIAH (בדיהOne of those compelled to give up their foreign wives in the 
        time of Ezra.

BEDSTEAD (ערש (‘er es)Only in Deuteronomy 3 is it translated “bedstead of 
        iron” of Og, king of Bashan; it is said to have been 9 cubits (4.4 m) long.  
        This bed's size suggests that it may have been some other object, such as 
        basalt sarcophagus.

BEE  (דבורה (deb o raw))  This bee was probably not domesticated until the 
        Greek period.  However, the fact that Canaan was so often referred to as 
        “the land of milk and honey” suggests that bees were plentiful.  Proverbs 
        6 extols the bee, after extolling the ant.

BEELIADA  (בעלידעBaal knowsOne of the sons of David who were born 
        in Jerusalem.  The name was changed to Eliada after they stop using the
        term “Baal.”

BEELZEBUL (Beelzeboul)  A designation applied by Jesus and his oppo-
        nents to the chief of the devil.  The source of this name and its meaning are 
        both obscure.  The following are possible interpretations:
                a) In Ugaritic, zbl  means “prince” and zbl B'l  occurs as a desig-
                    nation of the god Baal. Beelzebul might represent a later ap-
                    plication of this heathen term.
                b) In post-biblical Hebrew z-b-l means “dung.” Baal zibbul might 
                    therefore mean “Lord of Dung,” a contemptuous and abusive 
                    designation of the Evil One.
                c) The Hebrew word zebul means “dwelling,” or “abode.”  “Bee-
                    zebul” would have meant primarily “Lord of the abode (i. e. 
                    shrine) and would have been used as a designation for the 
                    rival of Yahweh.
                d) The Dead Sea Scrolls and early rabbinic literature employ the 
                    term to denote one of the seven heavens.  The name Beelze-
                    bul might therefore denote the Evil One as lord of that region.

BEER  (באר, a well)    1.  Israelite station where the princes and nobles of the 
        people dug a well, somewhere north of the Arnon River.     2.  A place to 
        which Jotham fled after telling his fable, perhaps identical with Beeroth.

BEER-ELIM  (באר איליםwell of chiefs)  A Moabite city, perhaps the same 
        as Beer 1. above.
                                    B-17

BEER-LAHAI-ROI (באר לחי ראי“well of the living one who appeared to 
me”
        A well situated between Kadesh-barnea and Bered.  Its name was given 
        to it by Hagar after she met the Lord's angel there and received a reas-
        suring promise.

BEER-SHEBA  (באר שבע (see article for meaning) The Negev's principal 
        city and a noted sanctuary from very early times.  It was the southern out-
        standing limit of Israelite population, and was used in the phrase “from Dan
        to Beer-sheba” and vice versa to mean the entire nation.
                   The meaning of “Beer-sheba” is uncertain.  In Genesis 21 it is both 
        “the well of the 7” (i.e. 7 lambs Abraham gave to King Abimilech to seal 
        their alliance), and “the well of the oath.” Genesis 26 says that Isaac gave 
        the city the later name after making an oath and alliance with the same 
        King. Beer-sheba could be a Canaanite name, it could mean “well of the 
        7 demons,” or it could simply mean “the well of Sheba.” 
                   Beer-sheba lies in a gap in the hills of Judah, at the junction of 
        the north-south route from Hebron to Egypt, and the route that ran from the 
        Arabah north-westward to the coast.  It was a stopping place for most of 
        the caravans that traversed the region in any direction.  Abraham and Isaac 
        spent a lot of time there.   After the conquest of Canaan, Beer-sheba was 
        assigned to Simeon.  Samuel's sons Joel and Abijah were judges there. 
        Elijah went through Beer-sheba while fleeing Jezebel on his way to Mount  
        Horeb.  Little is known of Beer-sheba's fate  during the latter period of the 
        kingdom, but Judeans exiled in Babylon reoccupied it.
                   Beer-sheba was a religious sanctuary as early as the patriarchs' 
        time.  Its guardian deity was El Oram, who was worshiped by Abraham 
        and later assimilated into Yahweh; his name came to mean the Everla-
        sting God.  In the Amos' time, the shrine of Beer-sheba was one of the 
        most famous.  Amos' phrase “the way of Beer-sheba lives,” speaks either 
        of very sacred ritual, or of Beer-sheba's role as a place of pilgrimage.

BEERA  (בארא, a wellThe 11th son of Zophah in the genealogy of Asher. 

BEERAH  (בארהa wellA Reubenite deported by Tiglath-pileser  III in the 
        700s B.C.

BEERI (בארי, well 1. A Hittite, Judith's father, and Esau's wife.      2. The 
        father of Hosea the prophet.

BEEROTH  (בארות, wells)  It was 1 of 4 cities of the Hivvites which came
        to terms with the Israelites  and became part of Benjamin's allotment; the 
        site of Beeroth is uncertain. It was located on the border between Benja-
        min and Ephraim.   2 brothers from Beeroth, Rechab and Baanah were 
        captains of Ishbosheth who killed him in the 17th year of his reign. They 
        hoped to curry favor with David; he had them executed.

BEEROTH BENE-JAAKANבארת בני יעקן) , wells of the sons of Jaakan)  
        place where Israel camped, near the border of Edom, and near to where 
        Aaron died.  The site is possibly Birein, about 10 km South of el-'Auja.

BEHEMOTH  (בהמותdumb beast)  In the Old Testament, a fanciful name for 
        the hippopotamus, or some other mammoth living in the marshes.  In the 
        Apocrypha and the Pseudepigraphy, it denotes a mythical beast.  At the 
        end of the present era, Behemoth, like Leviathan, will challenge, but will 
        suffer defeat.   It was doubtless influenced by a fanciful interpretation of 
        Psalm 74, which speaks of God crushing the heads of Leviathan.

BEKA (בקע A weight called “half a sanctuary shekel.” Compared to a shekel, 
        beka is 5.7 grams.  Standard weights marked as beka weigh over 6 
        grams.

BEL  (בל, he who possesses, subdues, rules)  The title of Babylon's state-god, 
        Marduk; it denotes the god's supremacy in a certain locality.   Marduk is 
        Mesopotamia's counterpart to the Canaan's Baal.

BELA  (בלעswallowing up)    1.  Son of Beor and the first king of Edom; his 
        city was Dinhabah.      2. The first son of Benjamin and also founder of a 
        family group the Belaites.      3.  Son of Ahaz and descendant of Joel in the 
        genealogy of Reuben.  Apparently another name of Zoar, one of the “cities 
        of the valley.”
                                     B-18

BELIAL (בליעל, compound word meaning “worthless” or “useless”A word 
        used to describe a kind of person (e.g. a “man of Belial” is a reprobate, dis-
        solute or uncouth persons.)  There was a clear tradition that the word was 
        a proper name, for in 8 passages it is translated that way.  In the writings 
        after the Old Testament, “Belial” is uniformly regarded as the proper name 
        of that Prince of Evil, who manipulates and enslaves men, but who will be 
        defeated by the Messiah, aided by God and God's heavenly legions.  In the
        New Testament, the Belial figure appears in II Corinthians 6, where it says 
        that Belial and the Messiah cannot be reconciled.

BELIEF  (pisti(pees tees)See Faith.

BELL  (1. פעמון (pa ah moan), clapper, striker;  2. מצלה (mets il law) 
        “tinkler”)  1.  An object attached to the High priest’s vestment and made of 
        gold.  “Its sound shall be heard when he goes into the holy place before the 
        Lord.”  They may have been a survival of some magical purpose.      2.  
        decorative ornament for horses.

BELLOWS (מפח, (map poo akh) Mechanical device used to blow air on fires,
        used mostly by blacksmiths.   The bellows' development may be traced
        in stages.   1st, human lung power was used to blow on fires.  2nd, there
        was the utilization of the blow-tube to concentrate the draft. 3rd, there
        was a mechanical device attached to the end of the pipe to replace the 
        human lung.   Down to around 1550 B. C., the blow tube exclusively seems 
        to have been used in Egypt.   After that time, foot-operated bellows were 
        used in metallurgy in the form of bags mounted on bases that were at- 
        tached to iron or reed pipes.

BELOVED (דוד (dode); ידיד (yeh deed); אהב (‘aw hab); ἀγαπητός (ag 
        ap ay tos))  In the Old Testament, dode is used frequently in the Song of 
        Solomon; yedeed is applied to Benjamin; aw hab is used several places. In 
        the New Testament, agapaytos is used in reference to Jesus, the Son and 
        Servant of the Father; in reference to the church, successor to Israel and 
        the body of Christ; and in reference to congregations and their members,
        for Christ redeemed them and commanded them to love one another.

BELOVED DISCIPLE.  A disciple of Jesus, referred to only in the closing chap-
        ters of the Gospel of John and never named.  In the Gospel of John's Last 
        Supper, this disciple was lying close to the breast of Jesus; he asked 
        Jesus who would betray the Lord.  At the Cross, Jesus committed his 
        mother to the care of this disciple.  He was told by Mary Magdalene of the
        empty tomb, and outran Peter to the tomb, although Peter entered first.
                   The 1st way of identifying this disciple argues that so favored a 
        disciple must have been one of the 12, and a prominent one.  He can't be 
        Peter, with whom he appears, and James was martyred early.  This leaves
        John of the 3 that were closest to Jesus.   Peter and John appear together 
        in Luke and Acts, as Peter and the beloved disciple do in John.   This im-
        plies that John is the beloved disciple.
                   The 2nd method uses the internal evidence of the gospel to see 
        whether it indicates the identity of the beloved disciple.  3 views based on 
        this evidence are: 
                a.) The beloved disciple is an idealized figure, and as such should
            not be identified with an particular disciple;     
                b.) The beloved disciple is a Jerusalem disciple of priestly family or 
            connection, because the gospel centers in Jerusalem, and the disciple
            has access to a priest;     
                c.) The beloved disciple was Lazarus. He was the one man in the 
            gospel whom Jesus is said to have loved.  He lived near Jerusalem, 
            and could easily have taken Jesus' mother to his home.  And for 
            gospel resting on this disciple's witness to have “life through Christ”
            as its theme is fitting if the witness was the resurrected Lazarus.
                   Internal evidence thus points to Lazarus as the beloved disciple, 
        while external evidence points to John, the son of Zebedee. It is difficult to 
        reconcile the two lines of evidence and a final decision is hardly possible. 

BELT ( 1. אזור (‘ay zore);  2. חליצה (khal ee tsaw);  3. מצח (may zakh);
        4.מציח  maw zee akh; 5. פתיל (paw theel);  6. zwnh (zo nay))
                   1. A piece of equipment for Assyrian soldiers.      2.  A belt worn by 
        soldiers.     3. A girdle worn next to bare skin.      4. A term used in the 
        phrase “loosing the belt” (i.e. rendering a soldier impotent)      5.  wrestling 
        belt       6.  A money belt.

BELTESHAZZAR  (בלטשאצרmay he protect his lifeThe Babylonian name 
        given to Daniel by the chief of Nebuchadnezzar's eunuchs.

                                 B-19

BEN-ABINADAB (ﬢבבן-אבינ, father is nobleA man in charge of the provi
        sioning of the coastal district of Naphathdor (between Philistia and Phoe-
        nicia) for Solomon, and who married his daughter, Taphath.

BEN-AMMI  (בן־עמיson of my kinsman Lot's son by his younger daughter, 
        ancestor of the Ammonites.

BEN-DEKER (בן־דקרson of a piercing)  A man (or his father) in charge of 
        the provisioning of the second district for Solomon, which was generally 
        the same as southern Dan.

BEN-GEBER  (־גברבן, son of a warrior)  A man (or his father) in charge of the
        provisioning of the sixth district for Solomon, which had its seat at Ramoth-
        gilead.

BEN-HADAD  (בן־הדד)  1.  Ben-Hadad I; son of Tabrimmon son of Hezion.  
        He is first encountered as king of Damascus during the reign of King Baa-
        sha of (northern) Israel, with whom he had an alliance.  Baasha attacked 
        King Asa of Judah (southern Israel) in 879 B.C.; Asa bribed Ben-hadad I to 
        break the treaty and invade Baasha's Israel.   Ben-hadad protected the 
        caravan route through Galilee from Damascus to the Mediterranean coast.  
        Later Omri of (northern) Israel was forced to admit merchants of Damas-
        cus to the bazaars of Samaria.
                   When newly enthroned King Shalmanezer III of Assyria began to 
        menace Syria with yearly campaigns from 857-853 B.C., Ben-hadad de-
        manded Israel's utter submission, to force them into an alliance against 
        Assyria.   Twice Damascus was defeated by Ahab and Ben-hadad was 
        captured.   In 853 B.C., Shalmaneser III faced a Syrian coalition led by 
        Ben-hadad I at Qarqar; it ended in a draw as did 2 later Assyrian as-
        saults.   
                   Kings Ahab and Jehoshaphat of Judah, tried to take Ramoth-gilead 
        from Ben-hadad but failed and Ahab was slain.   He may have been the 
        “king of Aram,” whose leprous officer Naaman was healed by Elisha.   Ben-
        hadad's servant Hazael, who was anointed by Elisha as king of Damascus, 
        murdered Ben-hadad and took the throne.  Some scholars split all the  
        above events between 2 kings with the same name.
                   2.  Ben-hadad II (or III)  Son and Hazael’s successor around 798 
        B.C.   Ben-hadad II was enthroned during the reign of Jehoash of Israel.  
        He inherited a kingdom weakened by Assyrian assaults and couldn’t keep 
        all the territory that Hazael, had taken.  He lost territory to Israel; the cities 
        taken from Israel, and then additional territory.  When the Aramean state of 
        Hamath began to expand, Ben-hadad II organized a Syrian coalition to 
        curb Zakir of Hamath; Zakir withstood his enemies.  Ben-hadad died, most 
        likely in 773 B.C. 

BEN-HAIL  (בן־הול, son of strengthPrince and teacher under Jehoshaphat. 

BEN-HANAN (בן־חנן, son of gracious, favored one) Son of Shimon in the         
        genealogy of Judah.

BEN-HESED (בן־חסדson of kindness)  A man (or his father) in charge of  
        provisioning the third district for Solomon, which generally embraced 
        western Manasseh. 

BEN-HUR  (בן־חורson of a hole)  A man (or his father) in charge of the pro-
        visioning of the first district for Solomon, which was generally the same 
        as Ephraim.  

BEN-ONI  (בן־אוניthe son of my sorrow)  The name given to her son by 
        Rachel as she died at his birth.  He was renamed Benjamin by his father.  

BEN-ZOHETH (בן־צוחת) Son of Ishi in the genealogy of Judah; it could be a 
        description rather than a name. 

BENAIAH  (בניה, Yahweh has built 1.  The son of Jehoiada the priest, 
        whose years of loyal military service ultimately gained for him the rank of 
        commander of the army in the reign of Solomon.  His exploits werethe 
        liquidation of 2 warriors of Moab, the slaying of a lion in a pit amid the 
        winter snow, and a victory over an Egyptian giant won at a considerable
        disadvantage. 
                                         B-20

                   Benaiah served as captain of the foreign mercenaries who served
        as the royal guard under David. Although he was named as the comman-
        der of the Davidic militia of 24,000 men, the command appears to have 
        been honorary, since his son Ammizabad was in charge of the division. 
        In David's final days, Benaiah supported Solomon, the Davidic nominee.
        As captain of the royal guard, Benaiah had the offensive task of destro-
        ying the enemies of Solomon; he was rewarded for his loyalty with the 
        rank of commander. 
                   2.  A warrior from Pirathon of the hill country, who was among Da-
        vid's 30, and who served as commander of the militia which served in the 
        11th month of each year. 
                   3.  One of the Simeonite princes who enlarged their pastoral lands
         by conquest in the time of Hezekiah. 
                   4.  A Levitical musician, named among those who played harps in 
        the time of David. 
                   5.  One of the priests who were charged with blowing trumpets be- 
        fore the ark of Yahweh in I Chronicles. 
                   6.  An Asaphite whose grandson Jahaziel delivered a favorable 
        oracle to Jehoshaphat in II Chronicles 20. 
                   7. A Levite and a subordinate overseer, who assisted in the collec-
        tion of donations in Hezekiah's time.
                   8The father of Pelatiah, one of the princes of the people during 
        the Exile.
                   9. The name of four Israelites who banished their foreign wives 
        with their children in Ezra's time. 

BENE-BERAK  (בני ברקSons of Barak (lightning))  A city of Dan, identified 
        with one of the northwestern suburbs of Tel Aviv. 

BENE-JAAKAN (בני יעקן) A place where Israel camped near the border of 
        Edom.

BENINU  (בנינו, our son)  A Levitical witness to the post exilic covenant-renew-
        al under Ezra. 

BENJAMIN  (בנימין, son of my right hand (i.e. most favored))  A son of Jacob
        by Rachel and the ancestor of one of the 12 tribes.  The name of the tribe 
        of Benjamin is to be interpreted historically as “the southerner,” possibly 
        splitting off from the larger Joseph group made up of Ephraim and Manas-
        seh.   It is scarcely conceivable that this small fragment could have attained
        rights equal to the greater tribes among the 12.  But the Benjaminites 
        crossed the Jordan as outrider of the Rachel group, which while it decima-
        ted their tribe, also ensured their future as equals in the Israelite tribal go-
        vernment.  There may also be a historical connection between the Binu- 
        Jamina, a very rebellious Bedouin group, and Benjamin.
                The Old Testament tribe's territory is a wedge, the small base of     
        which lies in the mountain to the west and which stretches eastward to the 
        Jordan.  The Benjamite settlement eventually included Jerusalem, but be-
        gan as a few villages on the mountain ridge between Jerusalem and Bethel;
        perhaps it was an old tribe which ended up being stunted like Simeon and 
        others.  In fact, Benjamin might have almost disappeared, had the men of 
        the tribe not been permitted to kidnap wives. 
                   The Song of Deborah names Benjamin after Ephraim.   Benjaminites 
        remained true to their tradition and reputation as slingers and as “ravenous 
        wolves,” which probably refers to attacks on caravans.  Benjamin's role in 
        the Blessing of Moses sounds considerably more peaceful and appears to 
        be relatively late when it speaks of the beloved of Yahweh living in safety. 

                               B-21
        
                  Nothing in the preceding points to the fact that it was precisely Ben-
        jamin which would have been pre-destined to supply the first king. Yet 
        Saul was a Benjaminite.  After Saul's catastrophic end, Benjamin was one 
        of the few tribes which recognized Ishbaal as his successor.  Abner soon 
        succeeded in leading most of Benjamin over to David's side.  In Solomon's
        arrangement of districts, Benjamin appears as a separate administrative 
        district of the northern kingdom.  After the split into Israel (north) and Judah 
        (south), the Judean kings succeeded in winning the territory of Benjamin 
        as a buffer for their capital city.
                   In the Priestly Code Benjamin's place is always immediately after 
        Ephraim and Manasseh.  This combination is also popular in Chronicles,     
        except that Benjamin usually stands first, in order to preserve, to some ex-
        tent, the connection with Judah.  In naming the Jerusalem gates, Benjamin 
        is allotted the middle eastern gate next to Joseph.  2 of David's 30 heroes 
        were BenjaminitesIttai of Gibeah; and Abiezer of Anathoth.  Jeremiah was
        also from Anathoth, and the apostle Paul was also a Benjaminite.
                   2.  Great-grandson of Jacob, through Benjamin, Jediael, and Bilhan.
                   3.  An Israelite of the time of Ezra, who pledged to dissolve his mar-
        riage with a foreign woman.
                   4. A priest of Nehemiah's time, probably the same Benjamin who 
        participated in building the wall.

BENJAMIN GATE  A gate of Jerusalem, mentioned in Jeremiah 37, perhaps 
        the Sheep or Muster Gate.

BENO  (בנו, his son)  Son of Jaaziah, Merarite Levite.  It may be a description, 
        rather than a name.

BEON (בעןA town in northern Moab wanted by the tribes of Reuben and Gad; 
        probably the same as Baal-Meon.  

BEOR  (בעור)  1. The father of Bela, who was an Edomite king prior to the 
        Israelite monarchy.
                   2.  The father of Balaam, the seer summoned to curse Israel.

BERA  (ברע)  King of Sodom, defeated after rebelling against Chedorlaomer.

BERACAH  (ברכהblessing)  One of the warriors from Saul's brethren who 
        joined David's outlaws at Ziklag.

BERACAH, VALLEY OF (עמק ברכה (bear a cah  ay mek), valley of blessing)  
        A valley in the wilderness of Judah, southwest of Bethlehem.  Jehoshaphat 
        reassembled his people in the valley of Beracah after the defeat of the 
        coalition of Edomites, Moabites, and Ammonites at the ascent of Ziz.

BERAIAH (בראיהYahweh has createdA member of the tribe of Benjamin 
        listed as one of the sons of Shimei.  

BERECHIAH  (ברכיה, Yahweh blesses)  1.  The father of Asaph in the genea-
        logies of the Levites.
                  2.  A Levite, one of the “gatekeepers for the ark” mentioned in the 
        account of bringing the ark up to Zion.
                   3.  A chief of the Ephraimites mentioned in the Chronicler's fanciful 
        account of the defeat of Judah's  Ahaz by Pekah of (northern) Israel.        
                   4.  A son of Zerubbabel listed among David's descendants of  in a 
        genealogy which has as its point the fact that Zerubbabel was of the Davi-
        dic line.
                   5.  Son of Iddo, and the father of the prophet Zechariah. Elsewhere 
        in the Bible, Iddo is Zechariah's father.
                   6.  Meshullam's father; one of those who led, under Nehemiah, in
        rebuilding the wall of Jerusalem.
                   7.  A Levite listed as one of the inhabitants of Jerusalem in post exi-
        lic times in I Chronicles only.

BERED (ברד, hail)  1.  A son of Ephraim, and the founding ancestor of a smal-
        ler tribe.     2.  A place on the road from Canaan to Egypt, beyond Beer-
        lahai-roi. 

BERI  (ברי, well)  Son of Zophah in the tribe of Asher and the name given to 
        division of the Asherite clan of Zophah.  There is no connection between
        these Beriites and the other Beriites mentioned in the Bible.

BERIAH (בריעה, prominent, excellent)   1. The 4th son of Asher and ance-
        stral head of the family of the Beriites.     2. The 4th son of Elpaal, who put 
        to flight the inhabitants of Gath.     3. The 4th son of Shimei the Gersho-
        mite, of the tribe of Levi.      4. Son of Ephraim; the name here is uncertain.

                                                                  B-22
 
BERNICE  (Bernik(ber nee kay))  Bernice is mentioned in Acts 25, in the 
        narrative of Paul's appearance before Agrippa II.  She was Agrippa's daugh-
        ter, probably born in 28 A.D.   Her 1st husband was a certain Marcus whose
        father, Alexander was a Jewish official.   When Marcus died, Agrippa be-
        trothed her to his own brother Herod.   There were rumors of an incestuous
        relationship between Agrippa II and herself.   She married King Polemo to 
        dispel those rumors. 
                   She returned to Jerusalem and was present in 66 when Procurator
        Florus pillaged the temple and massacred many people; Bernice was al-
        most killed.   Agrippa addressed them, urging the people with Bernice by his 
        side, warning them against provoking war.  Later that year, the Jewish popu-
        lace set fire to the palaces of Bernice and Agrippa.  She and Agrippa took an 
        oath of allegiance to the Roman Vespasian, and then Bernice became the 
        mistress of Vespasian's son Titus. 

BEROEA  (Beroia) Macedonian city 80 km southwest of Thessalonica, men-
        tioned in Acts 17.

BEROTHAH  A town Ezekiel listed as part of the northern boundary of the re-
        stored inheritance of Israel's tribes.

BEROTHAI  A city in the Syrian kingdom of Zobah from which David took 
         much bronze booty.  It is probably the same as Berothah and located about 
        10 km south of Baalbek in the western foothills of Anti-Lebanon.

BERRIES  (גרגרים (gar gar eem); elaia(eh lay ee ah))  In both Testa-
        ments, the reference is to olives. 

BERYL (a.) תרשיש (tar sheesh); b.) שהם (sho ham); c.) BhrulloV,  
        ber il lossilicate of beryllium and aluminum. The crystals are hexagonal      
        prisms, usually green or bluish-green, and sometimes yellow, pink, or white.
                   a.) Perhaps a yellowish stone in the breast-piece of judgment (Exo-
        dus 28 and 39).  In Daniel 10, it is what the man who appeared to the pro-
        phet resembles, most likely the brightness rather than the stone's color.
                   b.)  It is a stone in the covering of the King of Tyre. 
                   c.)  The 8th jewel in the foundation of the walls of New Jerusalem.

BESAI  (בסי)  Head of a family of postexilic temple servants.

BESODEIAH  (בסודיה, in the secret council of the Lord)  The father of a cer-     
        tain Meshullam who helped rebuild the walls of Jerusalem in the time of 
        Nehemiah.

BESOR, THE BROOK. A stream which David crossed on his expedition from 
        Ziklag in pursuit of the Amalekites who had sacked the city.

BESTIALITY.  Sexual intercourse between a man or a woman and an animal;
        the act carried the death penalty, and was probably associated with a
        Babylonian myth and/or magical ritual. 

BETAH  (בטח, confidence)  A town mentioned in II Samuel 8. 

BETEN   (בטן, abdomen)  A border town in Asher.  It is perhaps located about 
        18 km south of Acco. 

BETH  (ב)  The second letter of the Hebrew alphabet, as shown by the order 
        of the sections of Psalm 119. 

BETH-ANATH  (בית־ענת, house of AnathA town in Naphtali.  The earlier 
        Canaanite town is mentioned in lists of several Egyptian rulers of the New 
        Kingdom, located perhaps east of Acco. 

BETH-ANOTH (ענות בית house (shrine) of the goddess Anath)  A village of
        Judah in the district of Beth-zur, about 4.8 km north of Hebron, and 17.6
        km south of Bethlehem. 

BETH-ARABAH (הערבה בית, house (shrine) of the Arabah)  A border point 
        on Judah's northern border and Benjamin's southern boundary, perhaps lo-
        cated southeast of Jericho.

BETH-ARBEL (ארבאל בית A town destroyed by Shalman, according to Ho-
        sea 10.  It is now generally identified with the Irbid in Gilead, located at an 
        important crossroads. 

                                      B-23

BETH-AVEN  (און בית, house of wickedness)    1.  A town near Ai and east of 
        Bethel to which Joshua sent men from Jericho; it was on the border of Ben-
        jamin in the wilderness.     2.  A term which condemns Bethel as a place of 
        idolatry. 

BETH-BAAL-MEON  (מעון בעל בית, house of the lord of habitation)  A town 
        in Moab assigned to the tribe of Reuben, known better as Baal-meon.

BETH-BARAH  (ברה בית, house of the fugitive)  A town in or near the Jordan 
        Valley, perhaps west of the Jordan and northeast of Shechem.  It was 
        seized by Ephraimites under Gideon in the attack on the Midianites. 

BETH-BIRI  (בﬧאי בית, house of my making)  A city of Simeon in the south of 
        Judah. 

BETH-CAR (כר בית, house of a lamb or of pasture)  An unknown site evidently
        between Mizpah and the Philistine country, mentioned in I Samuel 7. 

BETH-DAGON  (דגן בית, house (shrine) of Dagon)  1.  A village in the She-
        phelah district of Lachish in Judah.     2.  A border point in Asher.  It's proba-
        bly located near Mount Carmel. 

BETH-DIBLATHAIM (דבלתים בית, house of 2 fig cakes)  A city of Moab 
        mentioned in Jeremiah 48 as part of a three verse, 11-town list of towns to
        be judged by God. 

BETH-EDEN (עדן בית, house of delightAn Aramaic city-state, between the 
        Euphrates and the Balikh River

BETH-EGLAIM  (עגלים בית, house (place) of the 2 calves)  A city 6.4 south-
        west of Gaza which covered a huge area and went through periods of oc-
        cupation and destruction from the 2100s B.C. to the 900s B.C.   This name
        does not appear in the Bible.  The Hyksos began occupation of the site in 
        the 1700s.  They built a great, mile-long ditch and 2 major palaces during
        their 250 year occupation.   The Egyptians conquered, took over the site, 
        and built 3 major palaces between the mid-1500s and the beginning of the 
        1200s.   By the time of the Conquest by the tribes and the Monarchy of 
        Israel, this city had greatly declined in importance; nearby Gaza gained in 
        importance.  There is evidence of occupation of the site by Rome as late as
        the 300s  A. D. 

BETH-EKED  (עקד בית, house of shearing)  A place on the road from Jezreel 
        to Samaria, perhaps 4.8 km north of Jenin.  Jehu slew the kinsmen of King 
        Ahaziah of Judah there. 

BETH-EL (אל ביתhouse of God)  An earlier name of this city was Luz.  It was 
        city located on the main north-south ridge road about 16 km north of 
        Jerusalem, where Benjamin and Ephraim's boundaries met.  It started off 
        being allotted to Benjamin, but that tribe lost it to the Canaanites in the 
        days of the judges.  Ephraim re-conquered it and retained possession of it 
        thereafter.  The Canaanite god El was one of the older major deities and 
        Bethel was a sanctuary city for him. In Hebrew, “el” became simply one of 
        several generic terms for God, and Bethel is so named by Jacob in Gene-
        sis 28.  Bethel is a site of major importance in the Old Testament, being 
        mentioned more often than any other city except Jerusalem. 
                   The site afforded no military advantages, but the wealth of nearby 
        springs on this high ridge made a city here inevitable.  The city itself was 
        founded around 2000 B.C.   It is first mentioned in Genesis 12, when Abra-
        ham builds an altar on the ridge east of Bethel, which was already sacred
        ground.  A city wall on the north, built by the Hyksos around 1750-1650
        B.C. was faced with a wide clay sheath to keep battering rams away. 
                   From 1650-1550 B.C., a garrison complex was built just inside this 
        wall near the gate.  An earlier wall on the west had its gate replaced by 
        Hyksos tower.  Archaeology sheds no light on the Abraham and Jacob nar-
        ratives at this point, but it is at Bethel that Jacob's name is changed to Is-
        rael and the Abrahamic covenant is renewed.   From that point on “Bethel”
        is inseparable from the history of Israel that takes place in Israel. 

                                 B-24

                   The history of Bethel presents confusing evidence for the time of 
        Joshua's campaign.  Ai, which Joshua is said to have conquered wasn't 
        occupied at that time.  On the other hand, Bethel, which isn't mentioned as 
        being conquered, suffered the most terrific burning yet seen in Palestine, 
        which fits the description of what happened at Ai in the Joshua narrative. 
        It may be that Bethel and Ai were blended into a common episode.  The 
        city which followed the burning of Bethel was of very crude construction. 
                   Excavations have found that Bethel was destroyed several times in
        the period of the judges.  Bethel was apparently recaptured by the Canaa-
        nites early in the period of the judges, after which it was recaptured by the
        house of Joseph.  The tribe of Benjamin was so depleted that the stronger 
        tribe of Ephraim just to the north re-conquered the city and retained pos-
        session from then on.  The road from Jericho to Bethel marked the boun-
        dary between these tribes. 
                   In the early phase of the judges the ark was located at Bethel.   The 
        ark's removal to Shiloh is later in the days of the judges.   If one of Bethel's
        destructions took place when the ark was at Bethel, this could be seen as 
        an attempt to destroy Israel's tribal government and religious center.  De-
        borah's judgeship, with its center “between Ramah and Bethel in the 
        Ephraimite hill country,” seems to come after Bethel's recapture by the 
        Ephraimites.   Her judgeship was at some time around 1125 B.C. 
                   For the rest of the judges' period, under the Philistines, and for cen-
        turies thereafter, even past the time of Jerusalem's destruction in 587, Be-
        thel seems to have led a charmed life in escaping destruction.   Samuel be-
        came the key figure of the judges; he worked a circuit of Bethel, Gilgal, and
        Mizpah.  Bethel, however, soon lost power to Bibeah, Saul's new capital 
        just to the south in Benjamin.  Under David and Solomon the city saw still 
        more fatal competition.   Bethel isn't mentioned in the days of David and 
        Solomon, but the town prospered in farming and commerce under the new 
        dynasty. 
                   In the split kingdom, Jeroboam I lifted Bethel to new prominence,
        making it the Northern Kingdom of Israel's chief sanctuary and the rival of 
        Judah's Jerusalem.   He instituted new sites, new clergy, new calendar, and 
        new cult techniques, including golden calves.   Bethel was still the king's     
        sanctuary as late as the time of Amos.  There was a prophet's school there 
        when Elijah and Elisha were en route to Elijah's translation.  When Abijah of 
        Judah conquered Bethel, he didn't destroy the city, but incorporated it into 
        his own kingdom. 
                   While Assyria conquered the northern kingdom, no sign of Assyrian 
        destruction of Bethel has been found; apparently the city was spared.   Jo-
        siah of Judah moved north to fill in the political and religious vacuum.   He 
        first annihilated the Bethel sanctuary which then had distinctly Canaanite 
        features, and attempted to wipe out her clergy; the city was spared.   Nebu-
        chadnezzar also spared the city, probably because of Babylonian colonists 
        planted there by the Assyrians.   The next major world conflict, however, 
        finally brought the city's tragic destructionat the hands of Nabonidus or 
        the Persians.
                   The Greek period showed rapid and solid growth.  Bacchides forti-
        fied the city, andthe city continued to grow under the Maccabees.  There is 
        also no evidence of destruction in 63 B.C. when the Romans took over Pa-
        lestine, and later, the New Testament makes no reference to Bethel.  The 
        south wall of this period enclosed within the city area the site's best spring. 
        It was the last city captured by Vespasian before he became emperor.   The
        city reached its population climax in the Byzantine Era.   The best Byzantine
        street and gateway in Palestine still show plainly at the northeast corner of 
        of the present village.  The city was destroyed around the transition time 
        from the Byzantine period into the Arabic.  It wasn't reoccupied until a cen-
        tury ago. 

BETH-EMEK (העמק בית, house of the valleyA border town in Asher, per-
        haps 9.5 km east northeast of Acco. 

BETH-EZEL  (האצל בית, house of firmness)  A place in southern Judah
        about 3.2 km east of Debir, mentioned among the word-plays of Micah. 

BETH-GADER  (גדר בית, house of the wall)  A village which may have been 
        in northern Judah and possibly the same as Geder.  The actual location is 
        unknown. 

BETH-GAMUL  (גמול בית, house of recompense)  A town in the Moabite ta-
        bleland, probably 12.8 km east of Dibon.  It is mentioned in Jeremiah 48. 

BETH-GIGAL (הגלגל ביתhouse of the wheel)  A place whose exact loca-
        tion is unknown, though it is identified with 2 different Gilgals, one near 
        Jericho, and one mentioned in Joshua 15. 

                                    B-25 

BETH-HACCHEREM (הכרם ביתhouse of the vineyardvillage of Judah
        about 3.5 km south of Jerusalem, mentioned in Jeremiah 6 as a fire signal 
        point, and in Nehemiah 3 as a chief city of the district. 

BETH-HAGGAN (הגן ביתhouse of the gardenA town to which Ahaziah fled 
        in an attempt to escape Jehu.

BETH-HARAM (הרם ביתhouse of destruction)  A fortified city of Gadloca-
        ted south of Beth-nimrah in the plains of Moab.  It was strengthened by the 
        Gadites to serve as a place of security for their families while they crossed 
        the Jordan to aid in the conquest of western Canaan. 

BETH-HOGLAH (חגלה בית, house of the partridgeA town of Benjamin on 
        its southern border a little west of Jericho.  It was mentioned in Numbers 32. 

BETH-HORON (חרון בית, house of the heightThe name of 2 adjacent 
        towns of strategic importance, Upper Beth-horon (about 8 km northwest of 
        Gibebeon and 530 m above sea level) and Lower Beth-horon (3.2 km fur-
        ther west towards the sea and 315 m above sea level), located on the road 
        from Gibeon to the Valley of Aijalon and the Shephelah.  Both cities were 
        on the southern border of the Ephraimite territory. I Chronicles tells us that 
        an ancestress of Joshua built both cities. 
                   Beth-horon was frequently the scene of battle. Joshua defeated the 
        kings of the Amorites there.  In Saul's time the place was raided by 
        company of Philistines. Solomon caused it to be rebuilt following an Egyp-
        tian raid.  This was one of the towns attacked by the Ephraimites of nor-
        thern Israel, after King Amaziah of Judah dismissed them from his army. 
                   (See also the entry in Old Testament Apocrypha / Influences Out- 
        side the Bible section of the Appendix.). 

BETH-JESHIMOTH (הישימות בית, house of wastes)  A town in the plains of
        Moababout 20 km south-east of Jericho.  It was the southern limit of Isra-
        el's encampment, and was assigned to the Reubenites.  The Moabites  
        later had possession, according to Ezekiel.

BETH-LE-APHRAH (לעפרה בית, house of dust)  An unidentified city. The 
        prophet Micah may be alluding to Ophrah or Bethel.

BETH-LEBAOTH (לבאות בית, place of lions)  A city of Simeon in the sou-
        thern part of Judah.   It is the same as the Beth-beri in I Chronicles.   The 
        exact site is unknown, but it is near Sharuhen.  

BETH-MAACAH (מעכה ביתhouse of Maacah)   A clan or territorial name 
        which later became part of the town named Abel-Beth-Maacah. 

BETH-MARCABOTH (מרכבות בית, place of chariots)  A city of Simeon 
        near Ziklag, and a place for the manufacture and storage of chariots. 

BETH-MEON (מעון בית, house of habitation)  A town in the Moabite table-
        land, more commonly called Baal-Meon and mentioned in Jeremiah 48. 

BETH-MILLO (מלוא בית, house of fullness)  A quarter in the city of 
        Shechem.

BETH-NIMRAH (נמרה בית, place of the leopard)  A city in the Plains of 
        Moab along the Jordan Valley, fortified by the Gadites.  Its location is most 
        likely at Tell Bleibel on the north side of the Wadi Sha'ib.  It is mentioned in 
        Joshua 13 and Numbers 32. 

BETH-PAZZEZ (פצץ בית, place of dispersion)  A border town in Issachar.  It 
        was located in the vicinity of Mount Tabor and En-haddah and was men-
        tioned in Joshua 19.

BETH-PELET (פלט בית, place of refuge)  A city of southern Judah near Beer-
        sheba.  It was one of the cities rebuilt by the Judeans after their return 
        from the Babylonian exile.   The site's location remains unknown.

BETH-PEOR (פעור בית, temple of (the god) Peor)  A city of Moab, allotted to 
        the tribe of Reuben about 5 or 6 km northwest of Heshbon.  It was here 
        “in the valley in the land of Moab opposite Beth-peor” that Moses was bu-
        ried after he had seen all the land from Mount Nebo.

                                    B-26

BETH-RAPHA (רפא בית, house of a giant)  Either a clan or a place name in
        Judah is suggested; it is mentioned in I Chronicles 4.12, neither can be 
        identified.

BETH-REHOB (רהוב בית, place of a square)  A town marking the northern 
        limits of Canaan.  During David's reign, it was an Aramean stronghold that 
        sent forces to aid Ammon.  The site's location is unknown.

BETH-SAIDA (צידא בית, house of the fisher (or hunter)  A city on the north-
        east shore of Lake Gennesaret (Sea of Galilee) just east of the Jordan 
        river, and mentioned several times in the New Testament in connection 
        with the ministry of Jesus.   The Romans classified it as a city and named it 
        Julias.  The tetrarch Herod Philip died and was buried there. Bethsaida-Ju-
        lias has been identified with 2 sites.   The remains of el-'Araj on the lake-
        shore mark the fisher's settlement of Beth-saida.  3.2 km away and 95 m 
        above sea level are the remains of the city of Julias.   There is a town wall, 
        well-cut stones, and an ancient mosaic there with a spring nearby. 
                   The position of Beth-Saida is inferred from Luke 9, which identifies 
        the town or a deserted place near as the site of the multiplication of loaves 
        and fishes.   The blind man in Mark 8 is in Beth-saida.  Beth-saida is called 
        the city of origin for the apostles Philip, Andrew, and his brother Peter.  De-
        spite that, Jesus' ministry seems to have failed there, and it is cursed.   It 
        shouldn't be confused with the pool of Bethsada in Jerusalem.

BETH-SHAN (שן בית, house of quiet)  A city at the intersection of the valleys 
        of Jezreel and the Jordan River.  It lies well within the trough of the Jordan 
        Valley, more than 160 meters below sea level, on the south bank of the pe
        rennial Jalud River.   Beside it passed the easiest route by which the trave-
        ler from Egypt turning inland might join the Jordan valley or desert routes 
        from Damascus and Arabia.  It was strategic, but it also had good soil and 
        a constant supply of water.  The site does not seem to have been occupied 
        much before 3000 B.C.; little is known of this society, except that it was 
        never defended with a wall.   The population must have accepted without 
        resistance the waves of nomadic intruders from the east, and practiced ag-
        riculture, weaving, basketry, and pottery without much ambition.  
                   "Beth-shan” appears in ancient Egyptian, Akkadian, and Hebrew
        texts from the 1400s B.C. onward.   Beth-shan is one of the towns of Upper 
        Retenu which Thutmoses III took possession of after the battle of Megiddo, 
        around 1468 B.C.   This was the beginning of 300 years of close depen-
        dence on Egypt and included an Egyptian garrison, usually of mercenaries.
        So long as Egypt controlled the cities of Syria, Beth-shan was a vital base 
        for protecting her communication with the north. 
                   Seti I erected 2 stelae between 1313-1292, one relating the attack
        and defeat of the princes of Hamath, and one relating the defeat of the “Ap-
        riu” (Hebrews (?)).   Ramses II erected a steele between 1292-1225.  Ram-
        ses III erected a seated statue between 1198-1167, most likely to comme-
        morate the Pharoah's second defeat of the “Sea Peoples.”
                   There is only vague evidence that the city mound's summit was pro- 
        tected by a brick wall and a fortress tower from about the time of Amen-
        hotep III.    As its name implies, Beth-shan was also protected by a resident 
        god whom most scholars are content to leave undefined.   Archaeologists 
        have discovered 2 sets of buildings, one by Thutmose III, and one by Ram-
        ses.  Both sets comprise 2 ancient shrines dedicated to a god and his con-
        sort.   Each temple contained an inner sanctum reached from the antecham-
        ber by a flight of steps.   The latest shrine remained in use until about 1,000 
        B.C. and could have been the temple in I Samuel 31. 
                   Whatever their nature, the chief deities of Beth-shan were represen-
        ted during the Egyptian period in human form.  The chief baal Mekal is 
        bearded, wears a high conical hat with a tasseled streamer, and with a pair 
        of small horns tied on by a long ribbon.   He holds an ankh in his right hand.
        2 goddesses, Antit and someone resembling Ashtaroth are also in human 
        form. 
                   The Israelite tribe of Manasseh failed to drive out Beth-shan's and its
        villages' inhabitants, for the Canaanites had chariots of iron.  It isn't related 
        how soon the Israelites were able to avenge the death of Saul and Jona-
        than and the outrage to their bodies on the walls of Beth-shan.  By the mid-
        900s B.C., Beth-shan was fully integrated into Solomon's fiscal system.  
        Around 926 B.C. Sheshonk I plundered the city, after which it drops out of 
        history for several centuries.  (See also entry in the Old Testament Apocry-
        pha / Influences Outside the Bible section of the Appendix. 
                   In Christian times Scythopolis (Beth-shan) was the capital of Pale- 
        stina Secunda and a metropolitan bishop's see.  The important remains of 
        this period are a circular church on the summit of Tell el-Husn and a mona-
        stery founded in the 500s A.D.  Scythopolis-Beisan fell into the hands of 
        the Arabs in 636, having witnessed in 635 the Christian forces' defeat in
        the Battle of Pella.

                                    B-27
 
BETH-SHEMESH (שמש בית, house (shrine) of the sun (god))    1.  A city on 
        the northern border of Judah between Chesalon and Timnah, 24 km north 
        of Tell ed-Duweir (Lachish), and about 38 km west of Jerusalem.  It was first 
        settled in the 2300s or 2200s B.C., and may have been a shrine at one time. 
        It seems to have been captured by the Hyksos in the mid-1700s; it was re- 
        captured by the Egyptians, possibly by Amen-hotep I.  The heavy fortifica-
        tions, southern gate, and other construction, show that it flourished from 
        the 1400s on.   It was the only fortified city in the Valley of Sorek, and an im- 
        portant frontier post between Judah and the Philistines. 
                   Beth-shemesh was assigned to Dan, although the Danites did not 
        immediately occupy it.   It was effectively controlled by the invading Danites 
        for a short time until the Philistines' establishment in the coastal plain.   The 
        general cultural level during the period of the judges was much inferior to 
        the preceding one, but there was evidence of extensive metalworking, 
        chiefly bronze but some iron.  While the Bible doesn't say that the Phili-
        stines occupied Beth-shemesh, a strong Philistine influence is indicated by 
        the great quantities of their typical pottery.   The city was almost certainly 
        under Philistine economic if not political control. 
                   In David's time, there was a governor's residence, a warehouse 
        and palace, which was built on an earth-filled platform. The chief industry 
        of Beth-shemesh at this period was olive oil and wine production.  Its occu- 
        pation came to an end near 900 B.C., probably as a result of Shishak's 
        invasion around 918 B. C.   It was reoccupied but never fully refortified and 
        existed as a much poorer city. 
                   After its loss to the Philistines during Ahaz' reign, the city presum-
        ably remained in their hands until Josiah's effort to restore the Israelite em-
        pire; it remained crown property until early in the 500s.  Nehemiah 4 implies
        a subsequent loss of the region, including Beth-shemesh, to Philistine. 
        Beth-shemesh itself was destroyed in Nebuchadrezzar's campaign of 588-
        587.  Nothing more is heard about the city.  In the 300s or 400s A.D., a
        monastery was built on the site but was later destroyed. 
                   2. A city in Issachar, near the Jordan River, just south of the Sea of 
        Galilee and east of Khirbet Shamsawi. 
                   3.  A Canaanite city assigned to Naphtali but not occupied by them.
                   4.  The famous religious city of On in Egypt, also known as Heliopo-
        lisabout 8 km northeast of Cairo.

BETH-SHITTAH (השטה ביתhouse of the acacia)  A place to which the Midi-
        anites fled after their defeat by Gideon and the Israelites. The location is 
        unknown, but it must be across the Jordan from Abel-Meholah.

BETH-TAPPUAH (תפוה בית, house of apples)  A town of Judah in the hill 
        country district of Hebron, a little over 7 km west of Hebron; it is men- 
        tioned in Joshua 15.

BETH-TOGARMAH (תוגרמה ביתhouse of TogarmahSame as Togarmah, 
        mentioned in Ezekiel 27 & 38.

BETH-ZATHA (Bhqzaqa , house of olives)  A pool in Jerusalem which had 5
        porticoes mentioned in John 5.   Tradition held that its waters were cura- 
        tive, and invalids lay about in its 5 porticoes. Jesus spoke to and healed a 
        man who had been ill for 38 years.  The story implies that the power to 
        cure lies in the waters only when they are troubled, traditionally by an 
        angel bathing in the pool. 
                   The Pool of Beth-zatha has not been certainly identified.  The story 
        places it in Jerusalem and near the Sheep Gate, which was built by the 
        priests.  The archaeologist Schick found twin pools with 5 porticoes, at 
        the foot of Mount Bezetha. The two pools today are on the property of the 
        Church of St. Anne.  They lie north and south, with a rock partition 20 feet 
        thick; their total area may have been about 46 meters by 92 meters.  Por-
        ticoes would have occupied the 4 sides and the partition.
                   There are many rock cisterns about Jerusalem, several of which 
        have been proposed as the Pool of Beth-zatha; none have as good of a 
        claim as the twin pools at St. Anne's.

BETH-ZUR (צור בית, cliff house)  A town of Judah, originally occupied by the
        Calebites, a little over 7 km north of Hebron, just off the north-south road 
        along the top of the watershed ridge.  It is on a hill about 1 km above sea-
        level, making it the highest ruined town in Palestine.  Beth-zur became the 
        capital of one of the hill-country provinces of Judah.
                   Apparently it was founded in the Middle Bronze period (i.e. the 
        1600s B.C.). Excavation has revealed massive fortifications similar in con-
        struction to those of the Hyksos period at Bethel and Shechem.  This pro-
        sperous city was destroyed in the 1400s, perhaps by Thutmoses III.  It re-
        mained unoccupied until it was rebuilt in the late 1200s or early 1100s by 
        the Israelites; around the mid-1100s it was again burned, possibly by the
        Philistines.  Evidence points to no occupation of this site in the 800s and 
        700s.  It was occupied during the 2 centuries after that, before it was de- 
        stroyed again, perhaps in the course of the Babylonian invasion.  
                   (See also the entry in the Old Testament Apocrypha /Influences 
        Outside the Bible section of Appendix.)

                               B-28

BETHABARA  (Bhqabara, ford, crossing)  A place of uncertain location be- 
        yond the Jordan where John was baptizing in John 1.

BETHANY (Bhqaia, house of the poor/afflicted, or of Ananiah)  1.  A small 
        village about 2.6 km east of Jerusalem and lying on Mount of Olives' ea-
        stern slope.  Jesus and his disciples lodged in suburban Bethany when 
        attending temple ceremonies at Passover.  One approach to Jerusalem 
        from the east was through Bethany and over the Mount of Olives ridge; 
        this was the course followed by Jesus when he arrived for this festival and 
        made his “triumphal entry.” It's also the site of Jesus' final “departure” from
        his disciples as well as Bethphage, which is nearby.  Muslims and Chri-
        stians have marked many sacred sites here, such as the traditional crypt 
        of Lazarus, the “spot where Mary met the Lord,” and a site for Mary's 
        anointing of Jesus' feet.
                   2. According only to John 1, the locale of the activity of John the 
        Baptist, where it is described as “beyond the Jordan.”  Some identify the 
        correct place as Bethabara.

BETHEL (DEITY) A west Semitic deity, originally a deification of the temple of 
        El.   The name's 1st appearance to our knowledge was in the 600s B.C. 
        treaty between Esarhaddon of Assyria and Ba'al of Tyre.   Some scholars 
        believe it is of Phoenician origin from 1000-2000 B.C., and some scholars 
        believe it is of Aramean origin.   In the Old Testament, scholars are certain 
        that it appears as a divine name in Jeremiah 48.  Some scholars also see 
        it as a divine name in Genesis 31, Amos 5 and elsewhere.

BETHEL (SANCTUARY) See Beth-el.

BETHER (short for בתר, house (shrine) of the mountain)  A town in the Bethle-
        hem district about 10 km south-west of Jerusalem.  Examination of the site 
        shows almost continuous occupation from Early Iron I (1200 B.C.) to the 
        early Roman period. Bether is best known as Bar Cocheba's (“son of the 
        star of Jacob”) capital after Akiba designated him as a messiah in 132  
        A.D. Located atop an easily defended hill, Bether was the last Jewish 
        stronghold to fall in 135.  Its fall was accompanied by a massacre; the re-
        mainder were sold as slaves. 

BETHESDA The King James Version's translation of Bhqedsa, found in John   
        5.  It is probable that Bhqzaqa (Beth-zatha) is the more accurate and 
        original form.

BETHLEHEM  (להם בית, house or place of: bread; food; fighting; (the god) 
        Lahamu
                   1.  A town in Judah; the home of David and the birthplace of Jesus, 
        about 9.6 km south southwest of Jerusalem.  The first historical mention of 
        Bethlehem is in one of the Amarna of the 1300s B.C.  Bethlehem was the 
        home of the Levite who became Micah's and later the Danites' priest, and 
        was the setting for most of the book of Ruth.  It prominence in the Old Tes-
        tament rests largely on its associations with David, especially as the scene 
        of his anointing.  During the late 900s the town was fortified by Rehoboam. 
        Its leading citizens participated in the Exile and many Bethlehemites re-
        turned from the Exile. 
                   The tradition that Jesus was born in a cave dates back to at least 
        the mid-100s A.D.  In 325, Constantine erected a basilica over a series of 
        caves.   Justinian I (527-565) built a new and larger church over the ruins 
        of the old one. The present structure is basically the one built by Justinian. 
                   2.  A town in the territory of Zebulun, about 10 km west northwest  
        of Nazareth.  It is the home and burial of Ibzan one of the judges of Israel. 

BETHPHAGE  (בית־פגי, house of unripe figs; BeqfaghA village near 
        Jerusalem and Bethany, and probably east of the latter, but the exact loca-
        tion is uncertain.   The name refers to a variety of late-season figs which 
        never appear ripe.   Beth-phage is only mentioned in the story of the trium-
        phal entry; it is where Jesus sent 2 disciples ahead to procure a young ass.  
        By legal fiction Bethphage marked the farthest limit of Greater Jerusalem 
        for ritual purposes.   Only from beyond it might one make a true pilgrimage 
        to Jerusalem.

BETHUEL  (בתואל, set apart of God)   1.  The last son of Nahor and Milcah; 
        Abraham's nephew and father of Laban and Rebekah.  He was the “Ara-
        mean of Paddan-aram.”
                   2.   A town of Simeon near Hormah and not far from Beer-sheba.  
        David is recorded as having given some of the Amalekites' booty to Bethel, 
        which is undoubtedly a mistake for Bethuel.

                                 B-29

BETONIM  (בטנים, pistachios)  A city in the northern part of Gad, about 10 km 
        from es-Salt and marking Gad's northern border.

BEULAH  (בעולה, married)  1 of 2 symbolic names denoting the future prospe-
        rity of Jerusalem (the other name is Hephzibah).  It is used in Isaiah to 
        symbolize Israel as the “bride” of Yahweh.  It is reflected in the New Testa-
        ment by the conception of the church as the bride of Christ.

BEVELED WORK (מורד מעשה (mah ah seh   mo rawd), work of descent
        Wreath-like scrollwork, probably in low relief, around the bronze panels of 
        the stands for the lavers in Solomon's temple.

BEWITCH  (Baskainw (bas kie no))  It is used figuratively in Galatians; i.e. 
        “to charm” with arguments to a degree that the power of reasoning is lost.

BEYOND THE JORDAN (הירדן עבר (ay ber  ha yor dan))  An expression 
        indicating the territory either east or west of the Jordan, depending on the 
        writer's viewpoint.  Of the approximately 30 times it occurs, only 5 refer de-
        finitely to the area west of the Jordan.  The rest refer to the eastern side 
        of, or the Trans-Jordan.

BEYOND THE RIVER  (הנהר עבר (ay ber  ha nah how er))  On the other, 
        eastern side of the Euphrates; the expression refers to the patriarchs' 
        homeland near Haran.  The Persians used the term to refer to the western 
        side, which included Palestine-Syria.

BEZAI  (בציSee Bezalel)  The head of a family that returned to Palestine after 
        the Exile, and one who set his seal to Ezra's covenant.

BEZALEL  (בצלאל, in the shadow (protection) of God.)  1. A Judahite in 
        charge of making the wilderness Tabernacle and its equipment.  He 
        designed adornments of the ancient sanctuary using various media.  His 
        versatility and craftmanship is attributed to his being filled with the Spirit of 
        God.     2.  One of Pahath-moab's sons, who divorced their foreign wives 
        when Ezra incited them to do so.

BEZEK (בזקlightning)  1.  A city where the tribes of Judah and Simeon inflic-
        ted a defeat upon the Canaanites and Perizzites.  It is probably located 
        about 3.2 km southeast of Lydda.
                   2. The rallying point for the men of Israel and Judah by Saul; from 
        there they repulsed the attacking Ammonites under Nahash's leadership. 
        It is probably 20.8 km northeast of Shechem overlooking the Jordan.

BEZER (בצרgold (?), fortress (?))  1. A division of the Zophah clan of the tribe 
        of Asher.      2.  A city of Reuben which was appointed a city of refuge and 
        was allotted to the Merarites.  It is probably 12.8 km northeast of Medeba.

BIBLE (Biblia (bi blee ah), the booksCollection of writings which the church 
        authorizes as legitimate parts of Holy Scripture.  The limits of this collection 
        have varied considerably at different periods and there are profound differ- 
        ences within the church over the degree of authority which is to be given to 
        the collection and to particular books within it.   The Bible has now been 
        translated into more than a thousand languages. 
                   The English Bible contains 80 books in its complete form: 39 of the 
        Old Testament (OT), 27 of the New Testament (NT) and 14 of the Apocry-
        pha.   It has become the general custom to publish Bibles of 66 books 
        which excluded the Apocrypha. The Latin Bible contains 72 books: 45 of 
        the OT, including 6 Apocrypha, and the same 27 NT as The English Bible.  
                   The Greek Bible includes the same NT as the English and a much 
        more extensive OT with additional works originally in Greek and Greek ver- 
        versions of Hebrew works no longer available in the original Hebrew.  The 
        Hebrew Bible contains the same 39 OT books as the English Bible.  The 
        Christian Churches accepted the judgment of the rabbis in the finalizing of 
        the OT canon.

BIBLICAL CRITICISM  (For the principles and processes of biblical criticism, 
        See Introduction to Dictionary.)

                                 B-30

BIBLICAL CRITICISM (HISTORY OF)
                   List of Topics—1. Introduction;     2. Pioneers of Modern 
        Criticism:  Elias; Grotius; Hobbes (1538-1679);     3. Pioneers 
        of Modern Criticism: Baruch Spinoza;  Jean Astruc (1632-1766);   
        4. The 1700s:  Simon; Eichhorn; Reimarus;      5. The 1700s:  
        Semler; Schleiermacher; Strauss ;     6. Later Developments, 
        Principles, and Processes.
                    1. Introduction—The scientific study of the Hebrew and Christian 
        scriptures did not arise until a few centuries ago.  In the ancient church, a 
        science of biblical criticism first developed in connection with the  Old 
        Testament's (OT) text, but only sporadically did questions arise that chal-
        lenged tradition as to the Scripture's historical accuracy and authorship.
        As early as 400 A.D., Theodore of Mopsuestia concluded that the Song
        of Solomon is to be understood literally as an erotic poem. 
                   Medieval scholars, with their love for mystical meanings, for the 
        most part did nothing to advance historical understanding of the Scriptures.
        In the 1100s, Hugo of St. Victor's had the insight that the Wisdom of Solo-
        mon wasn't written by Solomon and that Daniel 11 is to be understood 
        with the help of the Maccabees.   The above criticism lay beyond the hori-
        zon of the ancient and medieval church, as it presupposes the possibility 
        and right of free investigation, unfettered by absolute tradition or an infalli-
        ble institution. 
                   In their own way the Reformers virtually rediscovered the Bible, in-
        sisting upon the simple grammatical meaning of its language, freeing it 
        from the domination of church authority, and handing it back to the com-
        mon people.  But they also didn't introduce this branch of criticism.  Luther 
        gave his critical faculties free rein to the extent that he in principle exclu- 
        ded 4 books of the New Testament (NT) from his canon:  Hebrews, James, 
        Jude, and Revelation.  
                   These 4 books were relegated to a sort of appendix in his NT trans-
        lation.  He concluded that Hebrews was not by Paul or any other disciple.  
        James was not apostolic, because it contradicts Paul and neglects the pas-    
        sion, resurrection and spirit of Christ.   For Luther, Jude was a copy of II 
        Peter.   And Revelation was too confused, commends itself too much, and 
        does not teach Christ. 
                   Calvin also foreshadows biblical criticism.  He never wrote a com-
        mentary on Revelations, and while he does not reject Jude, James and He-
        brews outright, he has enough reservations about them to make special 
        mention as to why he includes them.  In the OT, it is clear to him that Jo-
        shua and Samuel didn't write the books named after them.  The germ of 
        criticism is present in both Luther and Calvin, but the conditions to cause it 
        to bud and grow were not yet present.  Post-Reformation divines became 
        absorbed in dogma and church controversies, for which they needed a 
        Bible whose divine authority could settle all disputes.  For them, the Bible 
        was God's book, infallibly and verbally inspired.
                   2. Pioneers of Modern Criticism:  Elias; Grotius; Hobbes (1538-
        1679)—In 1538, Elias discovered that the small marks made under the He-
        brew letters to indicate vowels were added sometime after the 500s A. D.  
        Starting in the mid-1500s, humanists were boldly investigating various an-
        cient documents' composition and authorship, making inevitable the appli-
        cation of similar criticism to the Bible.  
                   From the late 1500s to the mid-1700s, 4 non-theologians anticipated
        its development and paved the way for later professional theologians to do
        the same with better tools.  It is easy enough to see why the ultra-orthodox 
        church right after the Reformation could not have given birth to biblical cri-
        ticism and also why the church regarded these nonprofessional critics as 
        impertinent, derogatory, and blasphemous outsiders.
                   Grotius (Huig de Groot, 1583-1645) was a famous judge, and his 
        true significance lies in his quiet assumption of a right to study, analyze 
        and scrutinize the scripture's books exactly as one does any other book.  
        He expresses no doubt that Solomon is the author of and one of the spea-
        kers in the Song of Solomon.  It is simply a connubial dialogue between 
        Solomon and a wife:
                                B-31

                    Here the secrets of marriage lie hidden under the modest wrap-
            pings of words. His own annotations to the text are exclusively erotic.  
            Job, he decides, is not earlier than the Exile, and he has his doubts 
            about the historicity of Esther. The Letter to the Hebrews, which he 
            cannot ascribe to Paul, he finally ascribes to Luke.  Grotius suffered 
            prison and exile for the Arminian cause and became the chief literary 
            light of the Remonstrant Church in its first decades.
                   Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) was a philosopher who was aware of 
        Grotius' work.  Hobbes' real interest is neither in scripture nor in theology 
        but in the theory of the state; he sought a source of ultimate authority for 
        the state in the Christian scriptures.  He systematically inquired after the 
        authority and date of each writing in the OT.  “The light therefore that must 
        guide us in this question must be that which is held out unto us from the 
        books themselves,  . . . and though it show us not the writer of every book, 
        it gives us knowledge of the time wherein they were written.”  Hobbes de-
        nied that the Bible itself is God's revelation; it merely contains the record of 
        men who received this revelation.
                   For Hobbes, the 5 books of Moses were written after the time of Mo-
        ses.  Indeed all the books from Joshua and Judges to Kings and Chroni- 
        cles, were written long after the people and times they describe.  The book 
        of Job isn't a history, but a moral tract on the paradoxical faring of the wic-
        ked and the upright.  Proverbs were by Solomon among others.  The body 
        of Ecclesiastes and the Song of Solomon originated with Solomon, but the 
        title and inscriptions came later. 
                   Jonah isn't prophecy, but rather narrative with Jonah's disobedience 
        as its subject.  He also suggests that while Amos, Jeremiah, Obadiah, Na-
        hum, and Habbakkuk record prophecies really made by these prophets, it is 
        unknowable whether the recorders and publishers of them were the respec-
        tive prophets or others.   Hobbes thinks that the canon of the OT is not older 
        than the end of the Captivity nor younger than Ptolemy Philadelphus.   He 
        carefully refrains from criticizing the NT, and concludes that the authority of 
        the canon, as law, rests upon the sovereign. 
                    3. Pioneers of Modern Criticism: Baruch Spinoza;  Jean Astruc 
        (1632-1766)Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677) was a philosopher who was 
        neither Jew nor Christian nor atheist. He published a work “in which it is set 
        forth that freedom to philosophize not only can be granted without harming 
        religion or the welfare of the state, but can't be taken away without also ta-
        king away the welfare of the state and religion itself.”  The light of nature 
        and the light of revelation are ultimately identical.  One “must describe for 
        all the prophetic books, the life, character and aims of each books' author, 
        who they were, what occasioned his writing, when he wrote, to whom, and 
        in what language.” 
                   Spinoza concludes that the Pentateuch was not written by Moses or 
        Joshua by Joshua.  He suspects that all 12 of the books from Genesis to 
        II Kings were written by one man and that this man was Ezra, and that 
        smaller works of earlier authors are here thrown together without harmoni-
        nization.  The books of Chronicles he thinks, were written long after Ezra's 
        time.  He notices chronological disorder in Jeremiah, and he thinks that Job 
        was perhaps written by a Gentile in a language other than Hebrew. 
                   Like Hobbes before him, Spinoza is much less free toward the New 
        Testament; he contents himself with the conclusion that the apostles, 
        though they too were prophets, wrote mostly not as prophets but simply as 
        teachers.  His book was banned.  Spinoza had presumed too far upon 
        Dutch freedom, but his critical insights, both right and wrong, had already 
        become a sore and a stimulus to further biblical criticism. 
                   Jean Astruc (1684-1766) was a medical professor.  He was educa-
        ted by his father, a Protestant clergyman of Jewish origin who shortly after 
        his son's birth became a Roman Catholic.   When he was nearly 70 years 
        old he published, anonymously and after long hesitation, a work which be-
        gan modern source criticism of the OT's 1st 5 books. 
                   Astruc saw 3 things which demanded an explanationrepeated nar-
        ratives of the same event; the strange distribution of Elohim and Jehovah 
        (Yahweh); and chronological confusion.  He devotes half his book to a re-
        arrangement of the Genesis text into 4 columns corresponding to the 4 
        groups of sources he found.   He naively assumes that Moses actually 
        wrote Genesis in the same 4 columns which he used, and that later copy-
        ists combined them.  His work found an interested audience in Germany.
                   4. The 1700s:  Simon; Eichhorn; Reimarus—It was not until the 
        1700s that biblical criticism first made its appearance within theological 
        study.  The first professional theologian we will look at is Richard Simon 
        (1638-1712).   He was the forerunner of the modern “Introductions” to the 
        books of the Bible and one of the first to use biblical criticism in the intro-
        duction.   As important as the Bible is to Protestants as their highest autho-
        rity, one would expect him to be a Protestant.   Simon was a Roman scho-
        lar and a priest of the Oratory, and since his highest authority was tradition,
        he was freer in his criticism of Scripture.

                               B-32

                   For the first time in a theologian's work, he asserts that “Moses can-
        not be the author of all the books attributed to him.”  Simon brings to light 
        the archaeological remarks, diversities of style, contradictions, and repeti-
        tions found in the OT.  He shows that the historical books of the OT can't 
        have been written in the times they describe, but are actually a gradual
        gradual compiling of material and a final revision that took place much 
        later.  His recognition of this long process is still an important part of mo-
        dern biblical criticism. Simon's observations were the same as the non-
        theological pioneers, but were new to theology.  His work was passed by 
        the Church censor, but enemies in the Church caused the edition to be 
        confiscated and destroyed. 
                   Simon was forgotten until, nearly a century later, a Protestant theo-
        logian at Halle revived his work by a translation into German.  J. G. Eich-
        horn (1752-1827) was a professor of oriental languages at Jena.  He made 
        use of Astruc's work of separating the book of Genesis into 4 fragments, 
        he began the long series of modern introductions to the OT.   His enduring 
        merit is that he, more than any other, made it a natural assumption that the 
        OT, like any other literature, may and must be freely scrutinized, free from 
        tradition. 
                   Free investigation of the NT lagged far behind the OT.   We know 
        now that Reimarus (1694-1768), a professor of oriental languages, wrote a 
        great and puzzling NT work in biblical criticism.   It was so controversial 
        that not only was it published anonymously, the first part of it was pub-
        lished 10 years after the author's death, with the rest published over a 20 
        year period.   
                   This work was one which came out strongly against supernatura-
        lism, miracles, and even the halo worn by the Jesus that was portrayed in
        that time.   Its keen observation uncovered all the central problems of 
        Jesus' life.   Was the Judgment Day message of political or spiritual 
        origin?     Why was there surprise at the Resurrection, given the pas-
        sion predictions, and assuming they were historical?   Were there     
        creative additions in the oral tradition?   These were some of the ques-
        tions raised by this work. 
                   5. The 1700s:  Semler; Schleiermacher; StraussJ. S. Semler 
        (1725-91) was a theological professor at Halle; he wrote a particularly de-
        vastating criticism of Reimarus' work.   But Semler's book on the canon 
        and interpretation methods were a link in the development of NT criticism.
        He never wrote an Introduction to the NT, but he had an increasing influ-
        ence on biblical criticism from 1777 on.   From then on, German Introduc-
        tions to the NT came thick and fast, and it became clear that much could 
        be gained from an open-minded criticism of the OT.  
                   The long history of Pauline criticism was opened by Schleierma-
        cher (1768-1834), who demonstrated that I Timothy wasn't written by Paul.
        The many problems surrounding the letters of Paul and the book of Acts 
        were incisively opened up by Ferdinand Christian Baur (1792-1860) in the 
        mid-1800s.   He explained Christianity as the Catholic synthesis of a pri-
        mitive Jewish thesis provided by Jesus as a purely human teacher and 
        the Pauline pagan antithesis which made Jesus into the supernatural 
        Christ. 
                   During this period orthodox scholars were active in rebutting ex-
        treme views, but the traditional patterns were slowly crumbling.  Traditional 
        church dogma suffered severe shocks as it tried to adjust to such revolu-
        tionary views as Darwin's theory of evolution.  In reconstructing a “histori-
        cal” Jesus, David Friedrich Strauss had the most success and caused the 
        most outrage among conservatives in 1835. While he oversimplified and 
        reduced Jesus to nothing more than a Jewish wise man, Strauss' work be-
        nefited later criticism of Matthew, Mark, and Luke in pointing out the princi-
        ples by which the traditions appearing in our gospels had been preserved. 
                   It was the fashion among critics to reject the Gospel of John as very 
        late, and some were overly skeptical toward the Pauline letters. The “histo-
        rical” Jesus whom the 1800s produced was little more than the ideal moral 
        man of modern liberalism.  It must be mentioned that were also conserva-
        tive scholars who didn't just argue against liberalism, but who contributed 
        positively to this field of study by providing balance to the one-sided em-
        phasis of the radicals.
                   6. Later Developments, Principles, and Processes—In the OT 
        studies of the 1800s, no real breakthrough had come in the analysis of the
        first 6 books of the OT.  The 3 prevailing theories were: Eichhorn's docu-   
        mentary theory (which was an expansion of Astruc's hypothesis); 
        A. Geddes' fragment theory; and Heinrich Ewald's supplementary theory. 
        With these theories in mind, scholars and especially Julius Wellhausen 
        moved the writing of the OT as we have it today further and further from 
        the actual events being written about.  Some of the writing took place after 
        Israel returned from the Exile. 

                                                   B-33 

                   At issue were the cherished traditions as the Mosaic authorship of 
        the first 5 OT books (Pentateuch), and the entire structure of Hebrew his-
        tory and religion.  Believing that Hebrew religion began in a primitive form 
        like other religions, the Wellhausen school  traced its rise to the highest 
        stage.   Neither the patriarchs nor Moses were monotheists; Moses intro-
        duced worship of Yahweh as the chief among the gods.  It was the com-
        bined influence of the great prophets, the Deuternomistic reform, and the 
        Exile which established absolute monotheism in Israel. 
                    Reaction against Wellhausen's criticism of tradition was strong, and 
        archaeological discoveries provided a flood of antique documents, which 
        made possible a more scientific understanding of the history and religion of 
        the Bible people, while enriching the study of the written Hebrew language. 
                   New methods of interpretation began to develop in the last half of 
        the 1800s.  Herman Gunkel (1862-1932) and his associates laid stress on 
        3 methods of approach: 
                a.) determination of the oral tradition lying behind the written one; 
                b.) comparison of the cultic and mythological motifs of the religions 
                    of Egypt and Mesopotamia with Hebrew motifs, with attention 
                    paid to Israel’s reaction to outside influences; 
                c.) a sympathetic criticism of the literary forms in which the various 
                    tales, laws and poems of the OT appeared. 
        Gunkel took all these methods and used the cultural situation to help under-
        stand the literary forms and vice versa. 
                    After a little more than half of the 20th century, most scholars recog-
        nized the existence of the Pentateuch source documents as outlined by 
        the Wellhausen school.  There is an increasing interest in the individual 
        narratives, stimulated by Gunkel's methods.   It is now generally acknow- 
        ledged that the Pentateuch and the Former Prophets contain many very 
        old documents and record authentic traditions. Gunkel's form criticism on 
        the Psalms has indicated their great liturgical importance, and for some 
        psalms, their pre-exilic origins.   The development of Israel's religion and 
        theology is being placed in a new light.  OT critics now generally acknow- 
        ledge the uniqueness and grandeur of Yahwism and that the prophets of 
        the 700s B.C. were the heirs and perpetuators rather than monotheism's 
        creators.
                   In Albert Schweitzer's book The Quest for the Historical Jesus, 
        Jesus was a passionate preacher of Judgment Day who died seeking to 
        realize messiahhood, rather than a mild Galilean teacher of morality and 
        brotherhood.   And John's Gospel is now often assigned a first-century date 
        and is credited with a considerable historical trustworthiness.   Finally, the 
        apostle Paul is no longer looked upon as the arch-perverter of Jesus' reli-
        gion, but rather as a faithful follower and interpreter. 

BIBLICAL THEOLOGY  (For the principles and processes of biblical criticism,   
        See Introduction at beginning of Dictionary)
                    List of Topics—1. Introduction;     2. 3 Approaches to 
        New Testament Theology;     3. Descriptive Theology: Past 
        and Present Meaning;     4. Significance of the OT for the NT;     
        5. Using 1st Century Categories to Interpret the 1st Century;      
        6. Using Church History and Canon to connect Past and 
        Present;     7. Interpretation: Moving between Past and 
        Present
                    1. Introduction—A wider survey of the major contributions to the 
        field of biblical theology makes it clear there's no one definition of this field
        on which biblical scholars can all agree.   In the views of the “liberal theo-
        logy” of 1900, the Old Testament (OT) is a witness to the evolution of a gra-
        dually more ethical monotheism; the gospels are biographies of Jesus as 
        the even more refined teacher ofthe Golden Rule, God’s fatherhood, and 
        the individual’s eternal value.  The more radical scholars contradicted this 
        by showing that such a picture of Jesus or the prophets was impossible 
        historically.  The “peril of modernizing Jesus” was fully recognized as was 
        the distortion inherent in too much Westernizing of biblical thought.
                   Another difficulty with biblical theology lies with this fact: the Chris-
        tian church has produced a theological system out of the Bible, when the 
        Bible does not contain a system.  It comprises a diversity of witness inter-
        related with history.   What's clear is that a new stage has been set for bib-
        lical theology, and that there is good reason to consider the nature of the 
        new, descriptive biblical theology.   There has been increasing interest in 
        the New Testament (NT) theology of recent years, paralleling a rising inte-
        rest in OT theology.  In the mid-20th century, there has been a revival of 
        interest in a “theology of the Word of God,” which is associated with Karl 
        Barth and his school.  Their belief is that the scriptures are the products
        of a living faith.
                                    B-34

                   The results of 20th century studies in biblical theology have  
        brought a clear distinction between biblical times and modern times.  The 
        distance and strangeness of biblical thought was seen as a creative asset 
        rather than as a destructive, burdensome liability.  The theologically min-
        ded student found a new and deeper relevance in the pre-Westernized 
        meaning of sayings and events brought to their attention by religious 
        historians. 
                   The resistance to the “religious historians” disregard for theological 
        meaning and relevance led to a descriptive study of biblical thought in 
        which fewer value judgments were made in comparing the various stages 
        of development in biblical thought.  Less attention was paid to how histori-
        cally factual a given event was.   More attention was paid to the function 
        and significance of such an event to its contemporaries.   A balance was 
        struck between those looking at the Bible from a strictly historical perspec-
        tive, with no regard for relevance in the modern world, and those who 
        sought an eternal truth unconditioned and uncontaminated by historical 
        limitations. 
                   The more well-known OT studies (W. F. Albright, G. E. Wright, W. 
        Eichrodt, G. von Rad) were all inspired by the same tension between the 
        mind of a Semitic past and the thought of modern man:  Do these old 
        documents have any meaning for us—except as sources for our know-
        ledge of a small segment of first century life and thought, or as means for 
        nostalgic visit to the first era of Christian history?   If they have a mea-
        ning in the present tense and sense, on what ground do they have this 
        meaning?
                   2. 3 Approaches to New Testament Theology—3 theologians re-
        present 3 approaches to NT theology.   1st, Barth argues for a concentra-
        tion on the subject matter, which bridges the gap between the centuries, 
        because the subject matter (God, Jesus, grace, etc.) is the same now as 
        it was then.   He agrees with Calvin: one must rethink and wrestle with the 
        material until, when Paul speaks in his century, the 1500s man hears in his. 
                   Barth speaks as if it were a very simple thing to establish what Paul 
        actually meant in his own terms.  But biblical theology along this line is in-
        capable of enough patience and enthusiasm for keeping alive the tension 
        between what the text meant and what it means now.  Within the realm of
        systematic theology, it may may be better to speak of this theology as “bib-
        lical” rather than philosophical. 
                   2nd, Bultmann also finds meaning in the subject matter.  But there's 
        only one subject matter which is valid:  the self-understanding as it expres-
        ses itself in the New Testament.  For Bultmann, the intent of NT theological 
        utterances is not to state a doctrine, or give material for a concept.  It is to 
        challenge the human’s self-understanding.  “Events” are of little signifi-
        cance as events; what counts is to recreate their effect on human self-
        understanding.  This becomes “theology” when understanding is in refe-
        rence to God’s message. 
                   3rd, Cullmann finds the key to NT theology in its understanding of 
        time.  He urges us to recognize how the categories of time and history, 
        rather than essence, nature and eternal or existential truth, are the ones 
        within which the NT moves.  His work is basically confined to the descrip- 
        tive task with little clarification as to why or how he consider the NT as 
        meaningful for the present age.   On the other hand, when biblical theolo- 
        gians such as Barth and Bultmann become primarily concerned with the 
        present meaning, they lose their enthusiasm for the descriptive task. 
                   3. Descriptive Theology: Past and Present Meaning—There are 
        those who express serious doubts about the possibility of the descriptive 
        task.   Every historian is subjective in the selection of material, and not 
        always aware of any bias in their work.   The certainty of human bias 
        doesn't give us any excuse to excel in bias.   The descriptive task can be 
        carried out by the believer and agnostic alike.   The believer has the ad-
        vantage of automatic empathy with the believers in the text, but must 
        guard against modernizing the material.   The agnostic has the advantage
        of objectivity, but must work at empathizing with the first century believer. 
                   The tension between present meaning and the meaning in the dis-
        tant past that we find when we approach the OT is complicated for 2 rea-
        sons.  1st, one passage is likely to contain many layers of meaning from 
        many centuries of Israelite life.  Any statement of a descriptive sort about 
        what an OT passage meant has to be accompanied by an address:   For 
        whom and at what stage of Israelite or Jewish history.  The path which the 
        biblical theologian follows is thus that of the ongoing life of Israel as the  
        chosen people of God.
                   2nd, the church was born out of a dispute between the early 
        church and Jewish interpreters over the meaning of the OT.  The Christian 
        claim to the OT rested on the conviction that Jesus as the risen Christ was 
        the Messiah to whom the OT witnessed.  The Jewish focus was on the law 
        as the core of revelation and the token of Israel's chosen status.  The Wel-
        lhausen “religious history” school of the 1800s found yet another interpreta-
        tion of the OT and found the significance of the OT in the evolution of ethi-
        cal monotheism. 
                                    B-35

                  The source of both of these reasons is the question of meaning be-
        ing pursued beyond the material and the period of the OT texts themselves.  
        There must be a distinction between what is actually in the Bible and what 
        analysis and up-to-date translation produces in the way of a present day 
        meaning, in order for the original to act creatively on the minds of believers 
        of our time.
                   In OT theology, history presents itself as the loom of the theological
        fabric.  In more recent times, studying Israel's cultural development has 
        been tried with some success.  In the end, what is unique about Israel was 
        not its ideas about God or humans but in it being conscious of being elec-
        ted by God, which made its pattern of thought distinctive.  Salvation is with-
        in the history of Israel, and Israel's history is part of its salvation.  The histo-
        rical consciousness of Israel lives by the remembering of the past and the 
        ever new interpretation of it as a promise for the future.  The cultic rituals, 
        with their Near Eastern and Davidic roots, became part of the thrust for-
        ward into the promised future of bliss, righteousness, and peace.
                   In all this, the common thread is the ongoing life of a people cultiva-
        ting the traditions of its history in the light of self-understanding.  They are 
        guided by priests, prophets, and teachers of wisdom.   Using the framework 
        that exists within the life situations found in the Bible itself, rather than bor-
        rowing categories from the NT or later Jewish interpretation is the only way 
        to take the descriptive task seriously.  
                   Going back far enough may lead us to patterns of thought and 
        blocks of tradition originally quite unrelated to Israel’s historical conscious-
        ness.  Once we recognize them, we can see how they were modified to fit 
        into Israel’s religion and how much of the original remained.  When the OT
        is treated as the living and growing tradition of a people, it yields a theol-
        ogy which brings us up to the Jews and Christians parting ways. 
                  The announcement by Jesus that the new age is impending comes 
        as a vigorous claim for fulfillment of the OT promises that is not accepted 
        by the majority of Jews.  Jewish exegesis in the Christian era went rather 
        in another direction, with the emphasis shifted from the hopes for the future
        to obedience in the present under the law.  Who was right—the Jews or the
        Christians?   The answer remains what it always was, an act of faith. 
        History does not answer such questions; it only poses them.
                   4. Significance of the OT for the NT The significance of the OT 
        for the NT is thus shown to be inescapable, because on the basis of the OT 
        and its fulfillment in Christ rests the Christian claim to be the chosen ones 
        of God.  If a biblical theologian says what the OT meant based on a NT 
        perspective, he is engaging in an interpretation that goes beyond biblical 
        theology's descriptive task.  Thus the treatment of the Bible as a unity in 
        this sense is beyond the task of descriptive biblical theology. 
                    There is, however, one way in which descriptive biblical theology 
        does consider the Bible as a unity.  Israel's election consciousness is trans-
        ferred and heightened by the Christians.  Jesus has promised the disciples 
        a place as princes in the new Israel.  As Israel lives through its history as a 
        chosen people, so are the Christians now gathered together as the chosen 
        ones.  God is still the God of a people with an ongoing history, however 
        short it may have been.  Thus there is a unity of the Bible on a historical  
        basis.
                   In terms of Bible unity, we find there are different kinds of unity.  The
        unity of concepts and ideas is different from the organic unity to which the 
        testaments themselves witness. Our description has to detect and clarify 
        such developments as the disciples' interpretation of what followed after 
        Jesus' death as a drastic step forward in God's timetable.  
                   We couldn't answer whether the disciples were right or wrong, but 
        only describe what they did and why they thought they were right while 
        others thought they were wrong.  The first and crucial descriptive task of 
        biblical theology thus yields the original in its own terms, limiting the inter- 
        pretation to what it meant in its own setting.  Any question of meaning be-
        yond the one suggested by the sources themselves tends to lessen the 
        challenge of the original to the present-day theologian.
                   5. Using 1st Century Categories to Interpret the 1st Century—
        The ideal of empathetic understanding of the 1st century without borrowing 
        categories from later times has never been an ideal before.   There has ne-
        ver been an objective attempt to describe OT or NT faith and practice 
        strictly from within its original presuppositions.   The focal point for preser-
        vation of the historical in the biblical material was found quite naturally in 
        the insistence on the incarnation in Jesus Christ.   But incarnation was de-    
        veloped more for its significance for Jesus Christ’s nature, rather than its 
        significance for God’s timing in the Gospel of John, i.e. that God had now 
        come to people in Jesus Christ.

                                    B-36

                   In NT Christology, significant strands of tradition displayed the con-
        cept of Jesus as being adopted by God through baptism, resurrection, or 
        Ascension, rather than the doctrine of pre-existence and virgin birth that 
        later prevailed and led to the banning of “adoptionism”.   These concepts 
        were not in conflict until the biblical witness was forced to yield answers 
        about Jesus Christ's nature.  The biblical witness centers around the 
        questions:   Who is he?  Is he the Messiah or isn't he?  It doesn't ask what  
        Jesus is or how human and divine nature go together in him.
                   And when Acts 3.18 is looked at through the eyes of those who 
        lived when it was first written, it isn't the Second Coming of later theology.  
        There is only one coming of the Messiah, the one at the end of time.   The 
        ideas in this passage from Acts were part of the Jewish expectations con-
        concerning the age to come.   Thus history’s pattern in this NT theology  
        sheds new light on the discussion about the messianic consciousness of 
        Jesus.  Those who claim that Jesus knew he was the Messiah during his 
        earthly ministry overlook the fact that messiahship was spoken of with a 
        strong futuristic note.   We need to remember that even in studying the 
        Greek gospels, we are once removed from the Aramaic vernacular of 
        Jesus' teaching. 
                   The most common response to descriptive biblical theology's chal-
        lenge is called the semi-historical  translation of sacred history.  Some-
        where along the line, sacred history found in the scriptures has stopped, 
        and there is only plain history left.  In a semi-historical translation, sacred 
        history is only remembered in the church, not continued. 
                   6. Using Church History and Canon to connect Past and 
        PresentAn alternative to this is a systematic theology where the bridge
        between the centuries of biblical events and our own was found in the 
        actual history of the church as still ongoing sacred history of God's people.
        This theology would recognize that God is still the God who acts in history 
        when he leads the church to new lands, cultures, and areas of concern.
                    Through the ongoing sacred history, which is commonly labeled 
        “church history,” the fruits of God's acts in covenant and in the Christ are 
        handed to the present time.  The task of preaching and theology under the 
        Holy Spirit's guidance is part of an ongoing sacred  history.  The chasm be
        tween the centuries is theologically and historically bridged by history itself.
                   For such an approach, the literature written between the 2 Testa-
        ments is of equal or greater significance than some canonical material.
        What is also important here is an understanding of the idea and limitations 
        of canon itself, and of the puzzling and fascinating interplays of historical 
        circumstances and theological concerns that took place in the canon's for-
        mation.  For many modern theologians such as Barth and Bultmann, the 
        idea of canon seems to count for very little. 
                   For Barth, it is inspiration rather than canon that matters; canoniza-
        tion is an extern al feature, which neither adds to nor subtracts from the 
        power of the inspired writings.   Inspiration had little to do with choosing 
        the canon, as there were many writings recognized as equally inspired as 
        the final 27 books, but they lacked a historical connection to the apostles.
        For Bultmann, it is the kerygma, the divine message, that forms the canon, 
        and not the canon that forms the kerygma.
                   The historical approach asks the question:   Why is there a “New 
        Testament (NT),” and not simply a 4th part of the Old Testament (OT)?  
        The NT rests on the Spirit’s return.  Judaism of Jesus' time lived under the 
        conviction that Spirit and scriptures had ceased.  They recognized them-
        selves as in a period when Israel depended on scriptural interpretation, 
        while they still cherished the hope and the promise of the Spirit’s return. 
                   The closing of the NT canon isn't based on the idea that the Spirit 
        had ceased, as in Judaism.   The development from diversified oral and 
        written traditions to the NT books was of a more historical nature, in order 
        to protect the original from increasingly undependable elaborations and 
        distortions.  In the early Christian traditions, it was felt that a distinction had
        to be made between ongoing and clearly inspired writings and those which 
        could trace their origins to Jesus and the apostles; this led to the canon.
                   7. Interpretation: Moving between Past and Present What sig-
        nificance do these old writings have besides being sources for the past?  
        The answer rests on the act of faith by which Israel and its sister by adop-
        tion, the church, recognizes its history as sacred history, and finds in 
        these writings the epitome of God's acts. To be sure, the church “chose” 
        its canon. But it did so under the impact of the acts of God by which it was 
        created.
                   One could see Protestant Reformation as reaffirmation of the line 
        drawn around the canon.  It is a radical departure from being hopelessly 
        submerged in tradition.  A return to the “original” engenders one of the 
        most spectacular renewals of theology and church life that history has  
        seen, by breaking through many cherished presuppositions. Descriptive bi- 
        blical theology gives the systematic theologian a live option to attempt the 
        biblical material's direct translation, which is needed in the theology on the 
        mission field and in the young churches.

                                     B-37
 
                   With a sharp distinction between what the texts meant in their origi-
        nal setting and what they mean now, preachers must, in their studies, be-
        come truly bilingual.  They must be able to move through the Bible and an-
        cient patterns of thought with the ease of one brought up in those tradi-
        tions.  They must put themselves reverently back into the life and teaching 
        of the Bible, and look at ancient attitudes and activity from their own stand-
        point.  Their familiarity with the “language” of the contemporary world 
        should reach a similar degree of perception and genuine understanding.
                    If we take the simple statement that “Jesus is risen,” and see it 
        through the eyes of the first believers, the Resurrection was not surprising 
        in the same sense that it is for us.  They expected the Resurrection; what 
        was surprising to them was that it had happened “now” for them.  Prea-
        chers should let their familiarity with the biblical world guide them through 
        the way that the early church recognized and rejoiced in the resurrection of 
        Jesus Christ, and they could then make a live and relevant translation to 
        their present day audience. 
                   If the task of the pulpit is the true Sitz im Leben,  “life situation,” 
        where the meaning of the original meets but doesn't mix with the meaning 
        for today, then it is once more clear that we cannot pursue the study of bib-
        lical theology adequately if the 2 tenses are not kept apart.  The ideal bibli-
        cal theology in the Christian Church must treat the witness and OT and NT 
        views together, because both testaments have a great influence on how 
        the other is viewed.  For the life of the church, such a consistent descrip-
        tive approach is a great and promising asset which enables the church, its 
        teaching and preaching ministry to be exposed to the Bible in its original 
        intention and intensity, as an ever new challenge faith and response.  

BIBLICAL THEOLOGY, HISTORY OF
                   IntroductionFrom the very beginning of the use of the term “bibli-
        cal theology” in the 1600s, there has been tension between the contempo-
        rary and the biblical; between 2 centuries with drastically different modes of 
        thought. 
                  By appealing to Holy Scripture, the Reformation laid the ground for 
        biblical theology, the basic principle of which is that scripture should inter-
        pret itself.  It's the Protestant view that those who determine the necessary 
        beliefs or dogma should present the teaching of Holy Scripture, and also 
        that there is no language into which the Bible couldn't be translated well 
        enough to communicate its message.   Once church dogma distanced us 
        from the historical Jesus in the eyes of liberal theology, the need for “trans-
        lation” became real.
                   In the Enlightenment, the Bible was put to the test of reason along
        with the arts and sciences, history and philosophy, law and economics.   2  
        methods of inquiry evolved which have remained indispensable to biblical 
        theology:   literary criticism, which seeks to distinguish the work of indivi-
        dual authors, the original form, and the setting of scripture; and historical 
        criticism, which looks into the factors out of which biblical events and views 
        developed.
                   Biblical Theologians: G. E. Lessing developed a historical and sys-
        tematic concept of biblical revelation.  God was the great teacher, and the
        Bible his textbook.  The Old Testament (OT) was elementary teaching, 
        where Israel as a child, acquired the idea of one God and submitted to God.  
        But its service lacked motive until the idea of resurrection, and the expec-
        tation of reward and punishment hereafter, emerged.
                   His concept revolves around humankind rather than God, and 
        around the 3 central ideas of the Enlightenment:  God, freedom and im-
        mortality.  J. P. Gabler declared biblical theology to be a historical science, 
        and wanted those statements which were conditioned by time and place to 
        be the work of biblical theologians.  He sought to separate biblical theology 
        from the work of those who determine necessary beliefs and universal 
        truths. 
                   Likewise, in the New Testament (NT) he found 2 similar levels: 
        Jesus’ teachings, and its interpretation in the message of the apostles.  W. 
        Vatke distinguished three periods of development in the OT: the pre-pro-
        phetic, the prophetic, and the  post-prophetic.  Under the influence of Well-
        hausen and his school, theological interest declined in favor of historical, 
        and biblical theology of the OT became the religious history of Israel.  The 
        advantage of this type of analysis lay in the single line with which it moved 
        toward its end in presenting the development of the Israelite religion.   
                   But, pointing out how much the faith of Israel had in common with 
        other ancient, oriental religions seemed to put Israel on the same primitive 
        plane as them, and it failed to evaluate the material theologically.  Only a 
        few OT scholars attempted this evaluation.  For example, in E. Konig's Old 
        Testament Theology, he underscored the epoch-making character of Isra-
        el's faith and he discussed God and God's relation to the world and 
        humans, and sin and how to eliminate it as themes of “saving history.”

                                   B-39

                   In NT theology, F. C. Bauer applied the scheme of thesis, antithesis, 
        and synthesis to primitive Christianity.  In his view Jesus' teaching formed 
        the basis of the NT.  It was not yet theology, but strictly religion—the imme-
        diate expression of religious consciousness.  Bauer's thesis was that theo-
        logical reflection started over the place that the law had in one's faith, with 
        Paul as the first theologian declaring the gospel free from the law.   The 
        thesis was the Jewish adherence to the law, and the synthesis was the 
        compromise that was issued in the Old Catholic church.   In pietistic biblical 
        scholarship, one turned to the Bible to substantiate the orthodox theologi-
        cal position, and saw in the Bible the providence of God in “saving history.”
                  Biblical Theologians: For J. Bohme, God and the world, spirit and 
        body, belong together inseparably.  Both Bengel and Oetinger saw in the 
        Bible a living whole, a glorious and complete system of truth, which re-
        quired unified interpretation.  J. C. K. von Hofmann held that the Bible 
        documented the process of “saving history,” which aims at the redemption
        of humankind.   All revelation converges upon this end and every book of 
        the Bible has its place in this scheme of redemption.
                   H. Gunkel taught how from the form of biblical literature one can tell
        its setting in life, its Sitz im Leben, among the people.  O. Eissfeldt urged 
        both historical investigation of the Jewish religion and systematic presenta-
        tion of the timeless truth of OT revelation.   The first method resorts to rea-
        son to evaluate data, while the other relies on faith to perceive revelation.  
        W. Eichrodt held that theological assertions in the OT must be understood 
        in terms of the covenant idea found there.  According to Eichrodt, the peo-
        ple as a unit, the world, and individual persons are the 3 partners of God. 
                  Biblical Theologians: W. Vischer sets the OT statements in direct 
        relation to those of the NT.  The OT shows what Christ is, the NT who 
        Christ is.   T. C. Vriezen looks upon the OT as a book of revelation that con-
        verges on Jesus and finds its fulfillment in him.  Robinson sees the difficul-
        ties of OT theology lying in the fact that it doesn't appear systematically in 
        the Bible, but is continually bound up with history.   According to von Rad, 
        theological thinking in the OT arose with the task of gathering, arranging,
        and interpreting different historical documents.   They had to relate to the 
        whole of Israel.
                   For W. Wrede, primitive Christianity was a living religion whose es-
        sence couldn't be discerned from the scriptures alone, but must be illumi-
        nated also from the material of the surrounding world.  A. Schlatter recog-
        nized that Judaism provided the background of primitive Christian religion, 
        while R. Bultmann stresses the Greek influence in the Christian faith’s for-
        mation.   Both objected to a rational approach to NT theology.
                   Bultmann gives only scant attention to the preaching of Jesus in it-
        self, partly because strict form criticism leaves little behind in the way of 
        genuine Jesus sayings, and partly because Jesus' message is source 
        rather than object of the NT.  For him, as for Luther, the teaching of justifi-
        cation is theology's heart, and both he and Luther place emphasis on the  
        gospel and on the power of the word of the Cross.  The gospel awakens 
        in humans a new self-understanding which transforms the determining fac-
        tors in one's life so that one is freed from sin and becomes fully sensitive to
        God and one’s neighbor.
                   Conclusion:  Because God's revelation occurred in the history of 
        the people of Israel and in the history of Jesus and his apostles, biblical the-
        ology is interwoven in this history.  Any consideration of the theology of this 
        history should follow the course of it.  The light which falls upon thoughts 
        and actions of biblical persons from that source has made clearer the 
        uniqueness of their witness as well as its historical conditions.   OT scho-
        larship's task today is to describe Israel's covenant and the prophets' mes-
        sage from the Canaanite religion's point of view.
                   But purely historical research seldom concerns itself with the exis-
        tential truth of that which it describes, while the systematic method over-
        looks the fact that the truth of the Bible is personal in character.  Whoever 
        ill present the theology of the Bible cannot hold themselves aloof from it, 
        but must themselves be gripped by it and what it means to them personally.
                   If anyone wants to make it intelligible and believable to the people of   
        today, they must put themselves reverently back into the life and teaching 
        of the Bible, and take seriously what impelled the people of biblical times 
        when they look at biblical attitude and activity from a biblical standpoint.  
        The ideal biblical theology in the Christian church must treat the witness 
        and views of both OT and NT together, because how much both testaments 
        bear upon each other becomes increasingly clear in the latest scholarship.  

BICHRI  (בכרי)  Either the father of Sheba, the Benjaminite insurrectionist in II 
        Samuel 20, or an indication that Sheba was from the clan of Becher.

BIDKAR  (בדקר, son of piercing)  Jehu's charioteer at the slaying of Joram.

                                   B-40

BIER  (מטה (mit tah), soroV (soros))  A litter or bed on which a body was 
        placed prior to burial.  It is mentioned when David followed the bier of Ab-
        ner, and in King Asa's funeral in the Old Testament.  In the New Testa-
        ment, bier is mentioned when Jesus touched the bier of the young man of 
        Nain. 

BIGTHA  (בגתא, gift of God)  One of seven eunuchs who served Ahasuerus
        as chamberlains and whom he sent for Queen Vashti.

BIGTHAN  (בגתן, gift of God)  1 of 2 eunuchs of Ahasuerus who guarded 
        his threshold.

BIGVAI  (בגוי, God )  A Jewish leader who returned to Palestine with Zerub-
         babel after the Exile.

BILDAD  (בלדד, beloved of the Lord)  One of the 3 friends of Job.  As a 
        "Shuhite," his Aramean tribe would have roamed the area southeast of 
        Palestine.  

BILEAM  (בלעם, wasting of the people)  One of the Levitical cities in the terri- 
        tory of Manasseh.

BILGAH  (בלגה, brightness) 1.  A descendant of Aaron and head of one the 
        priestly divisions in David's time.      2. One of the chiefs of the priests lis-
        ted as having returned from Babylon with Zerubbabel. 

BILGAI  (בלגי, cheerfulness)  A postexilic who witnessed the covenant renew-
        al under Ezra. 

BILHAH  (בלהה, simplicity)  1. The handmaid of Rachel, given by her to Jacob
        to bear him children, out of jealousy for Leah's fruitfulness; the mother of 
        Dan and Naphtali, whose descendants became 2 tribes of northern Pale-
        stine.      2.  A village somewhere in southern Judah, probably the same as 
        Balah.

BILHAN  (בלחן, feeble)    1.  The first son of clan chief Ezer; ancestor of a na-
        tive Horite subclan in Edom.     2.  Son of Jediael, a Benjamite; it could be
        that this part belongs in the genealogy of Zebulun.

BILL  (ספר (sef ar), document, writing)  The document a man executed when 
        he wished to divorce his wife.  He must write it and put it in her hands be-
        fore he could send her away.

BILSHAN  (בלשן, eloquence)  Jewish leader who returned to Palestine with 
        Zerubbabel after the Exile.

BIMHAL (במהל, son of circumcisionA division of the clan Japhlet in the tribe
        of Asher in the Chronicler's post-exilic genealogy.

BINDING AND LOOSING  (אסר ('es awr), bind; התיר (hi tire), loose; dein
        (day in); luein (lu ane))  In one verse Jesus gave this power to all disci-
        ples.  In another Peter was given this power and the power of the keys.
                   In rabbinic literature, the Hebrew words mean “forbid” and “permit” 
        and express the verdict of a law-teacher who declares some action “bound” 
        (forbidden) or “loosed” (permitted).  They are also used in reference to a 
        ban and mean “condemn” or “absolve” respectively.
                   Both meanings have been applied to the texts of Matthew.  “To 
        loose” is the divine power to forgive sins and thus to admit new converts 
        in the church and to restore to the church repentant sinners.  “To bind” is to 
        announce God's judgment to unbelievers and impenitent sinners.  Another 
        interpretation holds that the opposite verbs “to loose” and “to bind” express 
        together the power entrusted to the apostles to do “everything.”

BINEA  (בנעא)  One of the descendants of the house of Saul, the son of Moza, 
        and the father of Rephaiah.

BINNUI (בנה, to build)    1.  Head of a family returning with Zerubbabel and 
        Nehemiah, probably the same as the Bani of Ezra.      2. A Levite of post-
        exilic times and the “son of Henadad,” who probably helped Nehemiah in 
        repairing Jerusalem's walls (NoteIn Hebrew there is little difference be-
        tween “sons of” and “Binnui”).      3.  A postexilic Jew, son of Pahath-moab.
        4.  Head of a postexilic family.
                                   B-41

BIRD (a.) כל בעל כנף (kal  ba 'al  ka nawf), all owner(s) of wings;  b.) עוף   
        (ofe), lier;   c.) צפור (tsip poe wer), chirper   d.) orneo(or nee on);     
        e. peteinon (pe tay in on), flier)  A class of warm-blooded vertebrates, 
        distinguished from other animals by their bodies being more or less com-
        pletely covered with feathers.  In the 1800s, there were at least 322 spe-
        ciesof birds, and perhaps 30 more.  Of this number, 260 appeared in 
        European bird lists. What was most notable was the “number and vari-
        ety of the larger birds of prey . . . which abound in every part of the . . . 
        land (Tristram).”
                   The Old Testament specifies that the unclean ones are, generally
        speaking, birds of prey.  Clean ones are not described or explicitly identi-
        fied, but they would seem to be all non-raptors.  We do not know how im-
        portant edible birds were in the household economy of the biblical period.
                   The numerous references to bird traps suggest that fowling was
        common.   The Hebrew phrase kal bahal kanaph (a.) and the word ofe (b.) 
        are general terms for all birds.  While tsippower is also a general term, it is 
        more often used to indicate game birds. 
                   In the New Testament, orneon is used in Revelation 18 to empha-
         size the ruin of Babylon, “the haunt of every foul & hateful bird.”  Petayi-
         non is used for birds in general.

BIRDS OF PREY  (עיט (ah yit), to fall upon in fury)  Any bird which seizes an-
        other animal for food.  Eagles vultures, hawks, falcons, etc. are a part of 
        this group and are considered unclean to the Hebrews.   

BIRSHA  (ברשע, son of wickedness)  King of Gomorrah, defeated after re-
        belling against Chedorlaomer.

BIRTH  (הולד (ho laid); מולדת, (mo leh deth))  Many births were desired be-
        cause of the importance of large families.  There was some understanding 
        of conception and pregnancy as well as birth.  It was thought that only the 
        seed of the male was determinative in conception and gestation, the 
        woman providing in her womb as a receptacle for protection and growth.  
        The bible reveals no evidence of birth control.
                   Birth was agonizing and so unforgettably painful that various writers 
        use this experience figuratively.  The words “Upon thee was I cast from my 
        birth” may suggest the father's act of receiving his child when it came from 
        the mother's womb.  The use of Mandrake plants may have had the effect 
        of relaxing the womb and facilitating the birth process.  One who is of an 
        untimely birth may lay down and sleep, avoiding the agony of life.  A birth 
        was the occasion for rejoicing and ceremonial activities, especially the birth
        of a  son.   Children were named at birth.  In a spiritual sense, one may be 
        born a second time, of the water and the Spirit, which is figuratively, a new 
        birth. 

BIRTHRIGHT (הבכרה (hab ba ko rah)The first-born son had a special inheri-
        tance; his was the principal inheritance of property and name.   Through 
        him the family line was continued.   Jacob's appropriation of Esau's birth-
        right is important, for it shows how Jacob, rather than Esau continued the 
        line of Abraham.  Birthrights may be taken away, as in the case of Reuben's, 
        which was given to the sons of Joseph.  At a meal the sons were seated in 
        order of their ages, “the first-born according to his birthright.”  Israel was 
        made God's first-born.  Paul had the privileges of Roman citizenship as a 
        birthright. 

BIRTHSTOOL  (אבן, (‘o ben))  An object upon which a woman sat during labor,
        possibly of Egyptian origin.

BIRZAITH  (ברזית, well of the olive tree)  A name in a postexilic list of clans of 
        the tribe of Asher.  It was near ancient Tyre, about 5.9km north of Ramalla.

BISHLAM  (בשלם, possibly son of peace1 of 3 men who took the lead in 
        writing a letter of complaint against the Jews in post-exilic Palestine to the 
        Persian king Artaxerxes.  It is possible that the word is actually a salutation 
        (e.g. “O son of peace”), or that it is erroneous copying of a word meaning  
        “against Jerusalem.”

BISHOP  (episkopo(e pis ko pos), overseer, guardianThe title of the chief 
        hierarchical order of ministry in the church, since post-apostolic times.  
        Opinion has been divided as to whether the term has a technical sense the 
        way that Paul used it.   Later apostolic letters (I Timothy and Titus) describe 
        the qualifications of the office.
                                B-42

                   The letters of Ignatius, martyr-bishop of Antioch provide the earliest 
        and most complete picture of a bishop's position and responsibilities in the 
        church.   To the Christian community, he embodied the “authority of God 
        the Father.”   No baptism, Eucharist, Agape church gathering was valid 
        without his presence or authorization.  He was the chief pastor of his flock,
        and administrator and dispenser of its charity.  Elders served him as a 
        council of advice.  The deacons were directly subordinate to him as assi-
        stants in worship and visitations.   He was spokesman and chief correspon-
        dent with other churches, and was responsible for all preaching and tea-
        ching, even though he himself might delegate this function.
                   The Didache, a book describing the organization of the church, 
        states that bishops (deacons) should be ordained, and should be “humble, 
        not avaricious, faithful, and well-tested.”  The bishop was elected by the 
        whole church that he was to serve.  He was ordained by prayer and the 
        laying on of hands.  The bishops were viewed in the church as the direct 
        heirs of the authority of the apostles, in an unbroken continuity of office.  
        The writer of the Epistle of Clement said that the apostles, when they had 
        preached in the villages and cities, “appointed their first converts . . . as 
        bishops and deacons of those who were to believe.”
              The Didache emphasizes the sacramental and worship-planning
        duties of the bishop.   It is reasonable to suppose, therefore, that the bi-
        shops were originally those ministers of the Christian communities or-
        dained as “overseers” of the Eucharistic banquet.   In Paul's letter to Phile-
        mon, he thanked the “bishops and deacons” for material assistance.  Paul 
        would naturally single out for special mention those church ministers who 
        received and dispensed the offerings of the people at the common mee-
        ting for the breaking of bread.
                   It is possible that there was a bishop-overseer for each house-
        church congregation.  He could decide which preachers, teachers, and 
        prophets would be faithful to the doctrine of the apostles, and therefore he 
        would allow only the faithful to speak.  The bishop would assume primary 
        pastoral responsibilities, with powers of excommunication. It was also the 
        responsibility of the bishop, in view of the increasing danger of persecution 
       by the state, to safeguard the community from detection and police menace.  
                   The office of bishop then, developed in response to the need for au-
        thoritative guardianship, but the office itself was of apostolic origin. Some 
        have seen in James' headship over the Jerusalem community the first  
        example of a monarchical bishop.  Others see it derived from the ruler of 
        Jewish synagogue, who had similar duties. 
                   The term episcopos is fairly common in Greek literature, papyri, and 
        inscriptions, both in its general meaning of oversight and as a technical 
        name for officials, both civil and religious.  Many Syrian inscriptions note 
        them as overseers of buildings, provisions, coins, etc.  There may even be 
        a Jewish origin of the title of “overseer.” The Jewish Qumran community's
        Dead Sea Scrolls describe an overseer with duties similar to those of early 
        bishops. Whether or not there is any direct relationship between the over-
        seer of this group and the office of bishop cannot be securely determined 
        until research is more advanced on the possible impact the Qumran com-
        munity might have had on primitive Christianity. 

BIT  (גמ (meh theg)) BRIDLE (מחסום (makh sohm)) The bridle is the head-
        gear of a horse's harness, and the bit is the metal mouthpiece by which the
        bridle works to control or restrain the horse.  Early metal bits were a bar with
        loop at end for the reins.  A jointed bit is also known around 1000 B. C.  The 
        words translated “bit” and “bridle” sometimes refer metaphorically to any 
        form of control.

BITHIAH  (בתיה, daughter of Yahu)  A daughter of Pharoah and wife of Mered 
        of Judah.

BITHRON  (הבתרון, the ravine)  The way by which Abner and his warriors re-
        turned to Mahanaim after their defeat near Gibeon.  It may not be a place 
        name, but rather the word for “forenoon” as suggested by W.R. Arnold.  
        The New Revised Standard Version uses Arnold's translation. 

BITHYNIA  (Biqunia)  A region in northwestern Asia Minor.  The Sangarius 
        River flows through Bithynia, and its lower valley forms the richest agricul-
        tural area of the country.  The kingdom of Bithynia was bequeathed to 
        Rome in 74 B.C.  Pompey organized Pontus and Bithynia into a single 
        province in 65-63 B.C.  Paul apparently had planned to go into Bithynia 
        from the south.  Dissuaded by the Spirit of Jesus from entering Bithynia, 
        he traveled west to the Troad. 
                               B-43

BITTER, BITTERNESS  (מרר (meh rar) the root word from which all 10 He-
        brew words for bitter and bitterness come)  Unpleasant experiences 
        were described in the Scriptures in terms of the sense of taste; bitter 
        taste was associated with the gall bladder. 
                  Experiences of bitterness may be classified for convenience under    
        active and passive emotion; living conditions; food (e.g. “bitter fruit”); water
        or other beverage.  Figurative use was made of each of these types of     
        experience. Particular attention was given to illustration of ethical values.

BITTER HERBS  (מררים (meh rar eem))  Herbs eaten with the paschal lamb 
        during the Passover.  Use of the bitter herb at this time took on increasing 
        significance.   The symbolism at first signified the haste with which the 
        meal was prepared and eaten, but eventually it was used as a symbol of 
        the bitter experience of the Egyptian bondage. Botanists cannot agree on 
        a specific herb. The Hebrew word and its Greek equivalent intend a gene-
        ral meaning which could include many different herbs.  Horseradish is  
        commonly used today in Europe and America today as “bitter herbs,” but 
        it was not known in Biblical times.

BITTER WATER See Medicine.

BITUMEN  (חמר, (kho mer))  Originally, mineral pitch or asphalt.  The Hebrew
        word may denote a foaming up.  It may also contain the idea of covering, 
        as in it's use to calk Moses' ark of bulrushes.  The Egyptians perhaps may   
        have used it in their embalming.   Bitumen pits were found in Assyria; it 
        was used as mortar in setting the burnt brick which formed the outer layers 
        of the ziggurat of Ur; for calking for the rafts and basket boats on the Eu
        phrates; and it was used in monuments. 

BIZIOTHIAH  (בזיותיה, contempt of the Lord)  In Joshua 15.28, a place in the 
        Negeb district of Judah.  The present text is probably corrupt and this part 
        should read “Beer-sheba and her daughters” (i.e. outlying villages) as 
        does a similar phrase in Nehemiah 11.

BIZTHA (בזתא, preyOne of 7 eunuchs who served Ahasuerus as chamber-  
        lain and whom he sent for Queen Vashti.

BLACK  (שחר, (sha khore); קדר, (ka dar); gelaV, (ge las)A word descri-
        bing the color of objects and also calamity, gloom, and mourning. 

BLASPHEMY  (נאצה, (neh ah tsaw); blasfhmia, (blas fa me ah)Slande-
        ring, reproaching, cursing, or showing contempt.  In the Bible, it is the dis-
        honoring and reviling of the name, being, or work of God by word or 
        action.  Archetypal enemies of God are usually full of blasphemies.  The 
        Jews accused Jesus of this crime, because he presumed to forgive sins. 
        The New Testament calls it blasphemy to revile Christ.  The Greek word is 
        used in a weaker sense as mockery of an individual.  When directed
        against spiritual authorities it approximates blasphemy against God.   The 
        “unforgiveable sin,” blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, is the conscious re-
        jection of God's saving work and the hardening of one's self against repen-   
        tance and forgiveness.

BLASTUS (BlastoVChamberlain of Herod Agrippa I; this name appears  
        in both pagan and Christian writings. Tyre and Sidon's people wanted to-
        regain Herod's favor, and they persuaded Blastus to help them do so.

BLEACH  (leukainV, (loo kie no))  To make white, as in the look of Jesus' 
        garments in the Transfiguration.

BLESSEDNESS (a.) ברוך, (baw rouk); b.) אשרי, (ah shar);  c.)euloghtoV
        (you lo geh tos); d.) makarios(mah kah ree os).  Note: in the Revised 
        Standard Version the word "blessedness" does not occur at all.
                   a.) The Hebrew word from which baruch comes is most often used 
        in the sense, “to worship, adore, praise.”  But the same word is also used 
        for God's “blessing” of people by manifesting God's favor and goodness 
        toward them.  And people are said to “bless” others, by invoking the bles-
        sing of God.  When “blessed” is used of God, as in “Blessed be the Lord,” 
        the meaning is primarily“Let God be worshipped, adored.”

                                  B-44

                    b.)  The Hebrew word asher is used only of humans, never of God. 
        and when “blessed” is used of people, the meaning is very different: hu-
        mans are “fortunate,  happy,” because they are assured of the blessing of 
        God.   It is the pious and good person who is blessed but his blessedness 
        does not consist in his piety and goodness, but in the material well-being 
        with which God rewards his faithful servants. 
                   In the New Testament, it is usually faithful Christians who are said to 
        be blessed.  The nature of the blessedness is seldom clearly stated, but
        when it is a reward for faithfulness in suffering, it is still in the future.    
        There seems to be a growing tendency toward a more spiritual idea of 
        blessedness.   Where blessedness is already present, it is not clear that it 
        is in any way a reward for anything, but rather it is a free, undeserved gift 
        from God.  In both Testaments therefore, the only constant connotation of 
        “blessed” is well-being and prosperity, which is the gift of God to humans.

BLESSINGS AND CURSINGS (ברוך (ber ah kah), blessing; ררא (a rar), 
         אלה (aw lah), andקללה  (kel aw law), curse) Power-laden words spo-
        ken on cultic or other occasions, through which the wholeness of the reli-
        gious community was safeguarded or strengthened, and evil forces con-
        trolled or destroyed.   It is very difficult to distinguish between 2 types of 
        blessings and cursings:   1st, those whose magical power rests with the 
        person blessing or cursing; and 2nd, those religious words whose effect
        lies in the power and purpose of the deity.
                   In the Old Testament (OT) there are clear traces of magical under-
        standing of blessings and cursings.    All Hebrew words begin with a root-
        word which is a verb.  The verbs barak and asher in its active form desig-
        nate a person acting to pronounce a blessing upon the community or an 
        individual. 
                   In its passive form it has a somewhat ambiguous meaning in cer-
        tain passages. Most often, it designates the action of praise and grati-
        tude for blessing received or as a prayer that Yahweh will be gracious 
        in providing blessing. 
                In later Hebrew usage the term arar appears as a synonym for the  
        passive barak. The Hebrew nouns most often used for “curse” are shown 
        above. The verb ''arar" is perhaps the earliest OT verb used to designate 
        the act of cursing. It frequently appears as the opposite of berakah. The 
        verb qelalaw may originally have been a weaker term for the act of cur-
        sing, but it became a synonym for arar in early Israelite times.
                   2 major types of blessings appear in the OT: pronouncements of 
        blessings, where there is power in the words themselves; and petitions 
        for blessing in which the power of blessing has become inseparable 
        from the deity’s purpose. An ancient blessing formula which was probably 
        connected with the Covenant ceremony is found in Deuteronomy 28.3-6. 
        The objects of blessing are the Israelites themselves or the basic sources 
        upon which Israelite life depends: the children, the land, and the animals. 
        The expression “Blessed be Yahweh” is the most common form of Israe-
        lite blessing, followed by the action for which God is to be praised. 
                   Curses in the OT are also often connected with oaths and with a 
        covenant; such curses are seldom attributed directly to God. Cursing the 
        deity is strictly prohibited, and using the power of God's name “in vain” to
        curse one's enemies is also forbidden. 
                   Blessings & cursings had their primary place within the Israelite 
        cultus. A father's blessing was a rite by which all the powers which made    
        for peace, health, prosperity, etc. were continued or even enhanced after 
        his death. Such blessings, once pronounced, couldn't be revoked. Within
        the confederacy of the 12 tribes of Israel prior to the monarchy's esta-
        blishment, blessings & cursings were probably a regular part of the fes-
        tival of covenant renewal.  The basic curse which befell Israel was the 
        curse of sin and disobedience. 
                   It was in the Israelite cult that the basic understanding of blessing 
        was developed. Yahweh was understood to be the source of all blessing. 
        The priest was enabled to declare blessing upon Israel, but only in Yah-
        weh's name.  Yahweh's blessing found primary expression in Yahweh’s histo-
        rical dealing with Yahweh’s people.   Similarly, cursings were drawn into the
        official cultic practices.   It was not a matter any longer, however, of finding 
        the right curse formulas to avert or destroy the old demonic powers.   None 
        of these powers could stand before the power of Yahweh's protection and 
        blessing.
                   In Judaism, the power to pronounce the Aaronic blessing was re-
        served to the priest.  Other blessings, such as the 18 Benedictions, were a 
        regular part of the synagogue services.   In the New Testament (NT), the 
        Beatitudes may have been intended as new blessings to go with the New 
        Covenant. 

                                B-45

                   The benedictions found in the introductory and concluding portions 
        of the Pauline letters as well as material from the book of Revelation con-
        tain the major additional material bearing on blessings and cursing in the 
        NT. Curses appear only seldom.   The curse of sin and death is seen to
        have been abrogated, once for all, in the death and resurrection of Jesus. 
        The definitive blessing has been bestowed upon humankind in Jesus Christ. 

BLIGHT  (שדפון (shid daw fone), scorchThe destruction of standing crops   
        by the scorching east wind which came dry and hot from the Arabian 
        Desert made it one of the most destructive natural forces in Palestine.

BLINDNESS  (עור (aw var))  The same word is used for physical loss of sight 
        and for metaphorical blindness.  To the biblical writers blindness was the
        consequence either of disease or of physical degeneration.   Ophthalmia 
        is a highly contagious disease that was frequently transmitted by flies, 
        aggravated by the sun's glare, and irritated by dust-laden winds.  Blind-
        ness in infancy not infrequently resulted from an acute inflammation of 
        the mucous membrane covering the eye, caused by membrane's infection 
        by the mother. 
                   The Mosaic enactments on the blind's behalf indicates that blind-
        ness was a serious social problem.   Impaired vision was included in the 
        disabilities-list which disqualified one from the priesthood.   Blindness in
        old age is mentioned several times in the Old Testament.   Jacob was
        able to deceive Isaac, because of his blindness.  Both Eli, the priest of 
        Shiloh, and Ahijah the prophet were blind in their old age. 
                   In the New Testament, Jesus used blindness and eye deficiencies to
        illustrate spiritual truths, and many of his healing miracles involved blind 
        people, the most notable being the man whose recovery of sight was gra-
        dual, and the man who was blind from birth, whose healing led Jesus to 
        declare himself as the light of the world.  Jesus related these healings to
        the faith of the person concerned. 
                   The blindness which overtook Paul outside Damascus may be ac-  
        counted for by the intense emotional strain of totally changing his spiri-
        tual values. This could have produced amaurosis, a blindness which oc-
        curred without any damage to the eye or optic nerve.  Because this phe-
        nomenon is invariably emotional in nature, dramatic cures can result 
        from suggestion and therapy. 

BLOOD, FIELD OF (cwrioaimsioV (ko ree on  ame see os))  A term 
        which appears only in Acts 1.  The Greek is the author's translation of the
        Semitic name for the place.  Other Greek authors have translated it 
        differently. 

BLOOD, FLOW OF (rusiV aimsioV (roo sis  i me see os))  A medical term 
        Luke uses to indicate a hemorrhage. 

BLOODGUILT  (דם (dawm))  In Israel, bloodguilt was defiling, but only through    
        slaying a man who didn't deserve to die.  Killing in self-defense and the exe-
        cution of criminals are explicitly exempted.   Where there's innocent blood, 
        there is always bloodguilt for:  intentional killing; unintentional death; death 
        through negligence or dereliction of duty; persons in authority incurred 
        bloodguilt for murders their subordinates committed.   Bloodguilt is even 
        caused by anyone who slaughters a beast at an unauthorized altar. 
                   The law allows the avenger of blood to take action against per-
        sons bloodguilty only of murder and unintentional homicide.  The avenger
        may slay the accidental homicide outside the asylum without incurring 
        bloodguilt.  The community is held bloodguilty if it fails to provide the ac-
        cidental manslayer with an asylum.  And since the bloodguilt of homicide
        lies on the entire community, they and the avenger both share the aim of 
        destroying the guilty party.  No money penalty or ritual cleansing may be 
        or need be addedthe murderer must die. 
                   If there is an untraceable murder in open country, the elders and
        priests of the town nearest to the corpse must perform a sacrificial purifi-
        ation.  Bloodguilt for which no amends is made is punished by God, the 
        ultimate avenger.  and God may exact retribution from the descendants of 
        the blood-guilty person. 

BLUE  (תכלת (tak ay leth))  A Biblical color of uncertain hue, probably purple-
        blue, obtained from Mediterranean mollusks.  As a color of the clothing of 
        idols it is rendered by “violet” in Jeremiah 10, and “purple” in Ezekiel 23. 
        Tyre long enjoyed a monopoly in the “blue” and “purple” industry, although 
        both colors were available elsewhere.  Materials dyed blue were widely
        used in the tabernacle, priests' clothing, and in Solomon's temple. Blue 
        was also used in the palace in the book of Esther.  The word “blue” does
        not appear in the Revised Standard Version or the King James Version of
        the New Testament.  However, “sapphire” and “jacinth” do. 

                                     B-46

BOANERGES  (BoanhrgeV (bo an er jez))  A name of uncertain meaning 
        given by Jesus to James and John, the sons of Zebedee.  Boaneh ap-
        pears to be a corrupt Greek form of a word meaning “sons of.”  Rges has 
        been explained as “tumult,” “wrath,” “thunder,” and “full brothers.”   Mark 
        translates it “sons of thunder” without indicating why the term is appropri-
        ate.  Were the brothers stormy in temperament, or were they zealots and
        revolutionaries?  There is some textual evidence the term originally may
        have been for all the apostles. 

 BOAR  (חזיר (kha zeer))  A wild pig, thought to be the ancestor of the dome-
        stic swine.   The only reference is the “boar from the forest” ravages the 
        vine Israel (Psalm 80).   Such a danger to crops and orchards must have 
        been ever present in the biblical period.  When used in the list to de-
        scribe unclean animals in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14, this word
        probably means both the wild and domesticated pig. 

BOAT (ploiarion (ploy ar eon)) A smaller craft used for fishing on the Sea
        of Galilee.  Sometimes ploion is also translated as “boat,” except when 
        describing Mediterranean Sea vessels, in which case “ship” is used.

BOAZ  (בעז, cheerful promptness)  A wealthy and virtuous Bethlehemite who, 
        as a relation to the family of Elimelech, redeemed that family's inheritance 
        and married the daughter-in-law of Elimelech, a Moabite woman named 
        Ruth.  He was of the family of Hezron of the tribe of Judah, King David's 
        great-grand-father, and an ancestor of Jesus.  When Boaz met Ruth, he 
        insisted that she glean only from his fields.  Ruth asked him to perform the 
        duty of next of kin and redeem the inheritance of the deceased Elimilech.  
        They married and had a son named Obed, who was to be the grandfather 
        of David. 

BOCHERU (בכרוhe is the first-born)  A Benjaminite, a descendent of Saul 
        and Jonathan found in I Chronicles. 

BOCHIM (בכים, weepers)  An unknown site between Gilgal and Bethel where, 
        in Judges 2, the angel of the Lord rebuked the people, and which received 
        its name from their weeping.

BODY (בשר (baw sour); sarx (sarks);  soma (so mah))  Usually an object 
        with physical properties of weight solidity, and substance; but the word 
        has also acquired social, spiritual, and metaphysical meanings. 
                   Early Hebrew apparently had no term to designate the body as a 
        whole in our sense.  It preferred to speak of various parts and organs indi-
        vidually.   The Hebrew word coming nearest to meaning body is basar or 
        “flesh.”  It also means kinship, and is used as another way of saying hu-
        mans, or for all living things.  This word did not acquire any important 
        theological meanings.  In the New Testament (NT), the word sarx is close-
        ly parallel to basar, but it acquired in addition profound psychological and
        theological meanings.  Soma is the common word for body.  It also came 
        to have metaphorical meanings. 
                   The Last Supper tradition, which Paul introduces in I Corinthians 11, 
        is clearly something he has received from an earlier time.  The saying “this 
        is my body,” introduces the idea that the loaf of bread which is broken in 
        communion ritual is the soma or “body” of the Lord.   This tradition in al-
        most the same form is preserved also in the Synoptic gospels.  In both ac-
        counts, there is a possible ambiguity.  Soma may designate a body with all
        its elements, including blood. Yet tradition refers to drinking the blood sepa-
        rately.   And when Jesus died, the blood flowed out of his body.  In the gos-
        pel of John 6 the word sarx is used in place of soma. 
                   Paul also refers to the “sinful body” in Romans 6 and in chapter 7 to 
        “this body of death.”   Paul regards body and flesh as the seat of sinful de-
        sires.   But the body of sin may be also at the same time the redeemed 
        body, although it never becomes a sinless body.   Paul explains this by ma-
        king frequent use of the spatial concept of being “in Christ.”   It is baptism 
        that brings one into Christ's body. 
                   The union with Christ is expressed by the figure of marriage, where 
        Christ is the husband and the Christian is the wife, both together as one 
        body.  Paul argues that the body is “not meant for immorality, but for the 
        Lord, and the Lord for the body.  Paul also uses the image of the body as 
        a temple in which the Spirit dwells.  This means that “I am no longer in 
        Christ, but Christ is in me.”

                                    B-47
 
                   He also said “I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who 
        live, but Christ who lives in me.”  With daring imagination, Paul grasps for 
        one physical symbol after another in an effort to express his sense of the 
        mystery of spiritual fellowship with Christ. One of Paul's most sublime con-
        cepts is that the church is the body of Christ.  Paul's basic idea is that 
        there is only one body, that this body is the church, and that it is the body 
        of Christ.
                   One of the issues Paul had to deal with was the fact that Greek
        Christians believed in a spiritual life, but had an aversion to physical 
        resurrection. Paul felt that as a human being is incomplete without a 
        body, a resurrection is required for a future life. Paul concludes that as 
        there are heavenly and earthly bodies, so the human body which is 
        buried is mortal, but that which is raised is immortal. The basis of his 
        conviction is the personal testimony of those who saw the Lord after 
        his resurrection as well as his own experience. 

BODY OF CHRIST  (See Christ, Body of) 

BODYGUARD  (משמעת (mish mah ‘ath); טבחים (tab bak eem), guard,  
        cook)  person armed to protect another person, usually a sovereign, and 
        responsible directly to him.   David was captain of Saul's bodyguard, as 
        well as personal bodyguard to Achish, king of Gath.    Benaiah ben Jeho-
        iada was one of David's 30 veteran warriors and head of his bodyguard.  
        In Genesis 37 and 39, Potiphar was captain of Pharaoh's bodyguard. 

BOHAN, STONE OF  (אבן בהן (eh ben  bow han), stone of the thumb)  
        boundary marker between Judah and Benjamin southeast of Jericho.  This 
        phrase was once misunderstood as mentioning one of Judah's sons.

BOIL (שחין (shekh een))  Inflamed swellings under the skin.  In Job 2, small-
        pox may be indicated; the Egyptian plague may be blains or skin anthrax.
        The boils afflicting Hezekiah was probably from a staph' infection. 

BOLDNESS  (a.) tolmaw    (tol mayo); b.) parrhsia (par reh see ah);
        c.) parrhsiazomai (par reh see az oh my))  Word (a.) is used of ac-
        tion that rises above fear.   Words (b.) and (c.) from their origins suggest 
        free, unhindered speech, as in the old Athenian democratic tradition. 
                   "Boldness" in the New Testament becomes almost a stock term to 
        describe the standing, the manner, and spirit of those who proclaim the 
        gospel. The new Christian approach to God is marked by confidence and 
        faith.  Even before the dread Judge in the end-of-the-age event the man 
        of faith need not shrink back. This bold, new spirit does not rest in self-
        confidence.  Christian faith for living stands sure in the promises of God; 
        the presence of the Spirit brings inspiration and guidance. 

BOLLED  (גבעל (gib ole))  The Hebrew may refer to the flower bud or seed 
        pod of flax.

BOLSTER  (מראשות (mer ah ash oth), at his head)  While the King James 
        version translates this word as an object, in Hebrew it denotes a place.

BOND  (עצור (es awr); מוסר, (mo ser aw);  desmoV (des mos); sun-
      desmoV (soon des mos))  A term used both literally and figuratively to 
        mean “obligation,” “dependence,” or “restraint.”  The meaning is literal in   
        I  Kings 14, and in Samson's bonds in Judges 15.  The meaning is often 
        figurative, as in the hands of an evil woman are like “fetters” or “bonds” 
        (Ecclesiastes 7). There are the bonds of wickedness, affliction, and judg-
        ment.  In the New Testament the meanings may also be literal, as in the 
        bonds of imprisonment or the very sinews of the body.  They may also be 
        figurative, meaning either the bonds of sin; or of peace and love.  

BOOK  (ספר (sef ar); ספרה (sif raw); bibloV (bib los); biblion (bib 
        lee on))  document written on a strip of leather or papyrus and then 
        rolled up; it may refer to either a simple letter or a longer literary work. 

BOOK OF LIFE (See Life, Book of)

BOOKS REFERRED TO (in the Bible)  The various written documents to which
        reference is made in the Bible are of 3 types:  source books used by the 
        authors of our Old and New Testament books; books mentioned as com-
        posed by Moses or other ancient authors; and books presented as divinely 
        authored.
                                    B-48

           The source books mentioned are:
                   The book of the Wars of the Lord (Numbers 21)  This was pro-
            bably a collection of old war poems on the fights between Israel and  
            the original inhabitants of Canaan.
                   The "Book of Jashar" (Joshua 10 and II Samuel 1)  A collection  
            poems and such authentic literary masterpieces as of both war 
            David's lament over Saul and Jonathan. 
                   The "book of the acts of Solomon" (I Kings 11) This was pro-
            bably a biographical document, compiled from royal annals and 
            emphasizing King Solomon's wisdom.  It may have included exam-
            ples of his justice &wisdom (e.g. judgment between the two harlots).
                   The "Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel" 
            (I Kings 14, 15, 16, 22 and II Kings 1,10, 13, 14, 15).  It may have 
            been a continuous journal compiled from royal records of the Kings 
            of the Northern Kingdom of Israel after Solomon's kingdom was divi-
            ded; it is mentioned 18 times.
                  The "Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah"
            (I Kings 14, 15, 22 and II Kings 8, 12,14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 23, 24)  The 
            same as the book just mentioned above only for the King s of the Sou-
            thern Kingdom of Judah; it is mentioned 15 times.
                   Of all biblical persons who are credited with the writing of books, 
        the one who receives the greatest acclaim is Moses.  He wrote of Amalek's 
        fate, “the book of the covenant,” and “the book of the law of Moses.”  
        Joshua is said to have written two books, one for the allotment of Canaan, 
        and the other renewing the covenant.  Samuel and Jeremiah are credited 
        with writing books. 
                   The oldest book presented as divinely authored is probably the 
        “book of remembrance,” (Malachi 3) out of which Moses was willing to 
        have his name removed.  It is the same as the book of truth and of life of 
        prophetic and apocalyptic writers and the “book of life” mentioned in the 
        New Testament. 

BOOT (סאון (seh own))  In the period's pictures, Assyrian soldiers wear high 
        leather boots laced up to the knee, in contrast to the sandals of the Israe-
        lite soldier.

BOOTH  (סכה (sook kaw); שך (soak))  A temporary shelter for cattle, men 
        and especially on the battlefield.  The booths used at the Feast of Booths 
        were to be made of branches woven together.   “Booths” were also used
        as figures of speech for anything flimsy. 

BOOTHS, FEAST OF THE (חג הסכות (khawg  ha sook koth))  One of Israel's 
        3 great annual festivals, celebrated with great joy in autumn, at the agri-
        cultural year's completion.  It was also known as tabernacles, “the feast 
        of ingathering,” “the feast of the Lord,” and “the feast.”  Scholars are divi-
        ded as to whether the Feast of the Booths was simply an agricultural fes-
        tival borrowed from Canaan and celebrated in the name of Israel's God, 
        or whether, from the beginning, it served as a vehicle for Israel's cove-
        nant faith.
                   Although Deuteronomy 16 prescribes that all male Israelites must 
        “appear before the Lord” three times a year, it seems that the Feast of 
        Booths ranks as the original pilgrimage festival.  In I Samuel 1, Elkanah, 
        father of Samuel, made an annual journey to Shiloh.  The booths, later 
        used to commemorate the wandering of Israel, are also derived from an 
        agricultural practice: to protect olive orchards, the owners used to guard 
        them by night, standing in shelters constructed of branches and vines.  
        Booths became an extremely popular festival in post-exilic Judaism.  
        Jews from Babylon and other more distant places made pilgrimage to 
        Jerusalem with offerings for the temple and the city. 
                   The feast began on the 15th day of Tishri (late September).  The 
        1st day of this month was a special holy day, and the Day of Atonement 
        fell on the 10th.  The 3 events seem to signify a separation in what was 
        originally a single observance. Also, the feast seems to have come just 
        before rather than just after, year's end. The feast proper lasted 7 days; 
        later an 8th & 9th day of special observances were added.
                   Each of the celebrants had to perform certain duties.  They had 
        to make themselves a booth in which they slept and ate all their meals for 
        days.  Further, every pilgrim had to collect twigs of myrtle, willow, and 
        palm in the environs of Jerusalem, which were used originally in the con-
        struction of the booths.  In later celebrations, they were bound together 
        into a sort of festal plume, called the lulab, to which citron was added.  
        The lulab was carried ceremonially during the daily singing of the Hallel 
        (Psalms 113-118). 
                                  B-49

                   3 common rites were performed on each of the 7 days of the feast
        proper.  The water libation ceremony was the 1st common rite for each 
        day of the feast.  A procession of priests went down to the Pool of Siloam 
        to bring up a container of water, which was to suffice for the 7 days.   The 
        priest circled the altar while the people cried, "hoshianah (Hoshono) Rab-
        bah."  On the 7th day, circling the altar was done 7 times.  The priests took
        the willow branches they carried, and instead of waving them aloft as on 
        other days, they beat the earth with them.
                    The 2nd great common rite occurred at night.  4 huge Menorahs 
        fitted out with wicks made from the worn out garments of the priests, illu-
        mined the entire temple area.  Under them the celebrants danced a torch 
        dance.  For the 3rd rite, each day at dawn, the priests proceeded to the 
        east gate of the temple.  At sunrise, they turned west to face the temple 
        and recited: “Our fathers when they were in this place turned with faces to 
        the east, and they worshiped the sun; but as for us, our eyes are turned to-
        ward the Lord.”  
                   The 8th day is not treated as one of the days of Booths proper, 
        although the Hallel was also sung in the solemn assembly held on the 8th 
        day.  The 9th day is called Simhath Torah (שמחת תורה, “the Joy of the
        Law”).  Every 7th year, the year of release, the law of the covenant is to be 
        read in the hearing of “all Israel.”
                   In its early stages, it was called “the feast of ingathering (Exodus 
        23),” and the observance was associated with the completion of agricul-
        tural work.  The Feast of Ingathering appears therefore, to have been an 
        occasion of great rejoicing with features of carnival-like indulgence and an 
        early stage in the process by which Israel came to terms with Canaanite 
        culture.
                   In Deuteronomy, this feast becomes the “Feast of the Booths,” with
        no special significance of the booths mentioned and no overt connection
        made between the feast and Israel's communal history.  In Leviticus 23, we
        learn for the first time that the ritual residence in booths is to commemorate
        that God made Israel “dwell in booths” when he brought them “out of the 
        land of Egypt.” 
                   2 questions arise from the preceding analysis:  when did the Feast 
        of Booths begin to function as a historical memorial for Israel; and what 
        were the forces that operated to give it this role?  Those that see it prima-
        rily as a nature feast of Canaanite origin, believe that it took on cultural 
        and historical significance for Israel during her exile in Babylon.   Others 
        believe that there was a tent festival in Israel's earliest history, and that it 
        assimilated the autumn agricultural observances of Canaan; over the years 
        the use of tents gave way to the use of booths.   H. J. Kraus's central the-
        sis is that Israel had a cult-feast tradition rooted in its own history by means 
        of which it could assimilate Canaan's vintage feast and develop it into the
        Feast of Booths.

BOOTY (בז (baz); מלקוח (mal ko akh); משסה (mesh ees saw))  Spoils 
        taken in battle.  It was a general custom in antiquity for victorious raiders or
        troops to despoil the conquered territory of everything of value.

BORASHAN  (בור עשן, cistern or well of Ashan)  Same as Ashan. 

BORROW, LEND.  To take on security a thing given for its safe return. The 
        borrower obtains use of the item from the lender.  Interest was not taken 
        from Israelites, but was allowed from Gentiles.  Usury was either taking 
        interest from Israelites or taking too much. Lending and repaying were
        both considered charitable acts.

BOSSED, BOSSES  (גב (gab))  Bosses are knobs, often ornamental, which 
        stand out from a flat surface.  Bosses on early shields strengthened the 
        shield itself, which was often leather over wood.

BOTTLE  (נאד (node))  Translation is difficult, but the word seems to be refer-
        ring to a wineskin. 

BOUGAEAN ( bougaioV )  A designation of Haman in Esther. In the primary 
        Greek version of the Old Testament, it replaces “Agagite,” which is other-
        wise replaced with “Macedonian.” Probably, it is a corruption of “Agagite.”

BOWS AND ARROW  (קשת (keh sheth); toxon (toks own), bow; חצ 
        (khayts), arrow)  The bow and arrow was the normal weapon used by the 
        nomad, the hunter, the raider, and the warrior.  In the Assyrian army bow-
        men, along with lancers were used effectively to protect those who 
        scaled the walls of a besieged city. 

                                    B-50

                   The arrow consisted of a shaft made of reed or light wood notched 
        at one end, with a narrow tongue at the other for attaching the arrowhead, 
        which were made of flint, bone, or bronze.  Since metal was expensive, 
        flint tips remained in use until the Late Bronze period (about 1550 B.C.). 
        Arrows were sometimes used for divination in Mesopotamia, and were often 
        used symbolically to represent violence.

BOWELS (מעים (may eem); splangca (splangk nah)) In the Revised 
        Standard Version, it is used only in the literal sense.  In the King James 
        Version, it is used for lower abdomen organs, and for strong emotions.

BOWLS  In the Bible, “bowl” and “basin” are often interchangeable terms. (See 
        also Pottery and Vessels). 

BOX (See Flask; Money Box; Perfume; Pottery; Vessels). 

BOX TREE (תאשור (teh ‘ash sure)) The King James Version translation of the 
        Hebrew word.  The box tree is not found in the Holy Land.  Some scholars 
        identify this tree with the cypress.

BOZEZ (בצץ, shiningA rock in the mountain pass between Michmash and 
        Geba; the exact site is unknown.

BOZKATH  (בצקת, elevated ground)  A village of Judah in the Shephelah dis-
        trict of Lachish whose location is unknown.  Jedidah, Josiah's mother (640-
        609 B.C.) was from Bozkath. 

BOZRAH  (בצרה, fortified place, sheepfold (See also the entry in the Old Tes-
        ament Apocrypha / Influences Outside the Bible section of the Appendix.).
                   1.  An important Edomite fortress city, home of King Jobah, about 
        32 km south-south-east of the Dead Sea, and 56 km north of Petra.  Built 
        on a spur, surrounded by deep wadis, and protected by a fort, Bozrah was 
        almost impregnable.  It guarded a road and the way to the Arabah copper 
        mines.  As a symbol of Edom's strength, its destruction signified the de-
        struction of all Edom.
                  2. A Moabite city which will share in the destruction of the land, pro-
        bably the same as Bezer.
                   3. Located about 97 km south of Damascus, this Bozrah became 
        Bostra and the Roman capital of the Arabian province under the Romans 
        after Trajan's conquest of the Nabateans.  Traditionally evangelized by one 
        of the 70, Bostra was long the ecclesiastical center of the Hauran region in 
        Northeast Palestine.  Later it became a Nestorian (Christian) center. Per-
        haps Muhammed learned a lot about Christianity here. 

BRACELET (צמיד, (tsaw meed))  An ornamental circlet worn on the lower arm. 
        Bracelets were common all over Palestine, and worn by both men and 
        women on one or both arms.  They were mostly of bronze, though there 
        are examples of iron, silver, and glass bracelets, and rarely of gold. 

BRAIDING  (emplokh (em plo keh); plegma (pleg mah))  An elaborate 
        dressing of the hair in knots, or entwining a wreath in the hair. 

BRAMBLE (אטד (a tad); batoV (ba tos))  A shrub with sharp spines and
        runners usually forming tangled masses of vegetation.  The context gives 
        no hints for identifying a specific plant, but European boxthorn, Palestinian 
        blackberry, and Palestinian buckthorn are mentioned as likely candidates.

BRANCH (כנה (kaw neh); צמח (tseh makh); נצר (nay tser); klado    
        (klad os);  klhma (klay ma))  The Greek and Hebrew words translated as 
        “branch” have many symbolic uses.  The spreading branches of a tree or 
        vine can symbolize the fruitfulness and prosperity of a man or a nation; 
        burnt or cut branches are used as figures of destruction.  “Branch” or 
        “sprout” is employed as a designation of Israel's present or future king.   It 
        has been suggested that this usage stems from identifying the king with 
        the Tree of Knowledge.
                   The most important of these passages is from Isaiah 11.1, which is 
        quoted in the New Testament in connection with Jesus“a shoot shall 
        come out from the stump of Jesse.”   The offspring of Jesse can be consi-
        dered a “shoot,” even as the branch can be called the “daughter” of the 
        tree.  The book of Jeremiah uses the phrase “a righteous branch.”   The 
        same phrase is used in Phoenician to indicate the throne's rightful heir.  
 
                                B-51

                   In Chapter 23, we have a contrast between a king righteous by 
        name (Zedekiah) but not by nature, and a future ruler who will be every-
        thing his name implies.  In Zechariah 3 and 6, the allusion to “branch” may 
        have been suggested by the name of the Babylonian king in question 
        (“shoot of Babylon”).   Ezekiel 8 speaks of putting the vine branch to the 
        nose.  This probably belongs in the context of worship of the dying and 
        rising god, and could also be a gesture of contempt. 

BRASS  (נחשת (nekh o sheth))  The Hebrew word stands for any copper al-
        loy (e.g. copper-tin or copper-zinc).  The Revised Standard Version uses 
        brass when it is a metaphor for hardness or obstinacy in sin.

BRAZIER  (אח (‘awkh))   Probably a portable firepan for the heating of a room 
        in cold weather. 

BREACH  (a.) פרץ (peh rets); b.) שבר (shay ber)) a.) This word is the com-
        mon one for “breach,” as in the breach made in a city wall by the enemy. 
                    b.) This word literally means “breaking into pieces”; The Revised 
        Standard Version translates it as “fracture.”  On rare occasions, other 
        words are translated as “breach.”  For example, badek is used in II Kings 
        12 to describe the state of disrepair of the temple during the reigns of 
        Joash and Josiah.
                   It is also used in Ezekiel 27 to mean caulking the seam of a ship. 
        “Breach” is also used  in Leviticus 5, where The Hebrew words ma'al 
        ma'al are used for “committing a breach of faith” or “treachery” in matters 
        of gifts due to the sanctuary, deposits, robbery, and fraud. 

BREAD (לחם (lekh em))  The baking and eating of bread are characteristic of 
        the agricultural life.  Bread is relatively scarce in the nomadic diet, since 
        only a small quantity of grain can be carried.  Nevertheless, bread was 
        one of the staples of the diet.  In Israel's later history, baking of bread be-
        came a profession; when he was in prison, Jeremiah was given a loaf 
        each day “from the bakers' street.”  In the average family bread was pre-
        pared in the home by the women. 
                   Usually bread was made from either wheat flour or barley meal in 
        biblical times.  Flour was more expensive than meal, so wheat bread was 
        preferred by the wealthier people, while the poorer classes had to be con-
        tent with barley bread.  In times of need, other cereals and even ground 
        beans were mixed with the flour to increase the yield of bread.  Bread was 
        prepared by simply mixing the flour or meal with water.  In the nomadic pe-
        riod of Israel's history no leaven was added before kneading.  After settling 
        in Canaan, however, it became customary to keep a small piece of the pre-
        vious day's batch of dough. 
                   The simplest way was to build a fire over a large, flat stone, remove     
        the ashes, place a flat piece of dough on the heated stone, and cover the     
        whole with the ashes.  A more advanced method is to bake “flat cake” on a   
        griddle probably made of clay. The most common method of baking is in an 
        oven that probably was shaped like an inverted earthenware jar.  Bread 
        was baked from the heat of a fire started in the oven the night before.
                   Bread was so important that the expression “eat bread and drink 
        water” could be used to signify eating & drinking as a whole.  Indeed, the 
        word lekhem is often translated “food” in both the Revised Standard Ver-
        sion and the King James Version.  Lack of bread symbolized extreme po-
        verty or distress. In Genesis 14, bread is mentioned as a gift to stranger. 
        loaves of bread were sufficient for the average person at each meal. 
        Bread was one of the most common elements of the cultic offerings of the 
        ancient Near East.  For Hebrews, the only absolute requirements were 
        that the bread be unleavened and seasoned with salt. 
                   Bread was often used in biblical images, as in the image of the 
        enemy as bread, something easily consumed.  Falsehood is called “bread 
        of conceit”; its taste is sweet, but later the mouth is “full of gravel.”  Since 
        the Eucharist's earliest form in the New Testament involved the “breaking
        of bread,” worship in general came to called by the same phrase, especi-
        ally in Acts 2 and 20.  Elsewhere in the New Testament, bread is used meta-
        phorically only in reference to the coming of kingdom of God or to Jesus 
        himself.
                   Jesus refers to himself as “the true bread from heaven” in the John
        6 after the disciples had referred to manna as “bread from heaven.”  When
        the disciples ask for this bread, Jesus strengthens his claim; he is the 
        “bread of life,” and those who follow him will never hunger or thirst. In this 
        part of John's gospel, there are unmistakable references to the coming 
        Last Supper.  But Jesus is also referring to his sacrificial deathparticular-
        ly in John 6.51.  The mention of manna as an ordinary food is intended to 
        show the superiority of Jesus to the law. (For the expression “daily bread," 
        see Lord's Prayer.)

BREAD OF THE PRESENCE  (פנים (ה)לחם  (lekh em  (ha) paw neem))  
        12 loaves set before God, made with 2/10 of an ephah of fine flour in each. 
        The loaves were arranged in two rows or piles on the table which stood 
        before the Lord in the holy place.  Fresh loaves were brought into the sanc-
        tuary each sabbath and the old loaves were then eaten by the priests in the 
        holy place.  Arrangements were made for the continual exhibition of the holy 
        bread in Solomon's temple where there were probably 10 tables for the 
        Bread of the Presence.  Presumably the bread was unleavened and baked 
        before the sabbath.  They were brought into the Temple the morning of the 
        sabbath and heaped in 2 rows of 6.
                   The earliest mention of the bread of the Presence is probably I Sa-
        muel 2.  After David's entrance in Nob, he requested the priest Ahimelech 
        to give him the holy bread which had been removed from the table in the 
        holy place in order to feed his men.  The fact that all references in the Bi-
        ble's first 5 books to the bread of the Presence belong to the Priestly code 
        do not support the conclusion that the Hebrew rite was a late innovation 
        reflecting Babylonian influences. 
        
                                 B-52

                   There's no evidence that the bread of the Presence was ever under-
        stood as a sacrifice, even in early Israel.   It was originally thought of as a 
        meal for the deity, and later as a thank offering.  The table of the bread of 
        the Presence which was in the 2nd temple was taken away by Antiochus 
        Epiphanes.  A new one was brought to the temple and consecrated by 
        Judas Maccabeus.

BREAKFAST  (aristaw (ah ris tay oh))  The noun used in John 21.12,13 to 
        translate the Greek word in the Revised Standard Version; the King James 
        Version uses “dine.” 

BREASTPIECE (OF THE HIGH PRIEST) (חשן (kho shen))  Either a pouch or 
        beautiful thing such as an ornament or garment.  The Breastpiece was 
        multicolored and made of the best fabrics.   When folded it made a double 
        square measuring 23 cm each way.  It served as a receptacle for the sa-
        cred lot, and it marked the high priest as representing all Israel. With it the 
        high priest brought Israel into Yahweh's holy presence. 

BREASTPLATE (שרין (shir yon))  A breastplate of one or more pieces of 
        metal would be worn over a leather jerkin or tunic.  There would be addi-
        tional armor for the back & other areas.  The breastplate also serves as a 
        figure of speech.  “The breastplate of righteousness” is used in both the 
        Old and New Testament.  God wears the breastplate in the Old Testament, 
        while the Christian puts it on in the New Testament.

BREATH  (נשמה (nesh aw maw); רוח, (roo ach)) The 1st word conveys the 
        narrow, literal sense of breath.  Ruach can also be translated as “wind” or 
        “spirit.”

BREECHES (מכוסים (mik nos seem))  Part of the garb of priests, which 
        served as a cover for the priest from the loins to the thighs. It was probably
        not the sown breeches we most often imagine, which are of Persian origin, 
        but more like an apron.

BRIBE; BRIBERY  (כפר (ko pher); שחד (shakh ad))  The giving of anything 
        which is intended to influence someone in the discharge of a legal duty. 
        Taking bribes is prohibited in the laws.  Bribes were not only used to sub-
        vert justice; they sometimes proved necessary in order to uphold justice. 
        Gift-giving to judges was common practice, so this meant the poor had 
        difficulty obtaining a hearing for their case, unless the injustice was so 
        blatant as to be impossible to ignore.  Since giving gifts was viewed as a 
        legitimate means of getting ahead, & was even recommended to pacify 
        antagonists, the distinction between gifts and bribes must sometimes 
        have been extremely subtle.

BRICK  (לבנה (leb ay naw))  In the ancient Middle East a most common buil-
        ding material was sun-dried brick; in Babylonia kiln-burned brick was 
        widely used.  Burnt bricks are mentioned in the Tower of Babel story.  In 
        the Palestine hills though stone was abundant and easily cut, brick was 
        used extensively in some city walls, as in the Middle Bronze (2100 B.C.), 
        Late Bronze (1550 B.C.), and Greek (300 B.C.) walls at Shechem.  In the 
        lowland cities like Jericho & Ezion-geber, sun-dried brick was used both 
        for city walls and for houses. 
                   In the Nile Valley, from prehistoric times to the present day, brick-
        making was an extensive occupation.  The clay was thoroughly soaked, 
        generally mixed with straw or other vegetable matter, and poured by the 
        artisan into molds or shaped by hand.  A few of the great monuments of 
        ancient Egypt were made of sun-dried brick and still are standing.  
        Mortar in Egypt and Palestine was of the same mud as the bricks; in Me-
        sopotamia bitumen was used.  Brick walls stood for several months before 
        any plaster was applied.
                   The best-known biblical story of bricks is in Exodus 5, where 
        Pharoah orders the Hebrews to make bricks without straw. The hardship in 
        this story is the added labor of having to find their own straw.

BRICKKILN (מלבן (mal baneProbably a mold of rectangular shape; the 
        word came to be used to describe any rectangle. Since bricks were sel-
        dom kilnfired in Palestine, and since Hebrew doesn’t use different words
        for different furnaces, it is most likely that David set his captives to work 
        at brick molds and not brick kilns.

                                     B-53

BRIDE (כלה (kal law), “daughter-in-law”A woman soon-to-be or recently mar-
        ried. Other words are translated as “bride,” when they refer to a betrothed 
        girl or a recently married wife. 

BRIDE (OF CHRIST) (numfh (noom feh), “daughter-in-law”A metaphor for 
        the Church.

BRIER (שמיר (shaw meer); ברקן (bar kawn)) Thorny plant.  It is used figu-
        ratively used of the enemies of Israel and of that which is worthless, espe-
        cially land.

BRIMSTONE (גפרית (gof reeth)qeion (thay eon))  It is said to have been a 
        means of divine retribution against Sodom and Gomorrah, the apostate 
        and wicked, the kings of Assyria, Edom, and Gog, idolaters, sinners, etc.

BROAD PLACE (רחב (rakh ab)) Given the rugged terrain of the Holy Land, to
        set in a broad place may metaphorically mean to deliver from danger, an-
        xiety, want or distress.

BROAD WALL, THE (החומה הרחבה (ha khoe mah  ha ra kha bah)) A sec-
        tion of the rampart of Jerusalem restored by Nehemiah (chapters 3 and 12). 
        Its place in the Bible suggests the northwest side of the city.

BRONZE (נחשת (nekh oh sheth); translated “brass” in the King James Ver-
        sionAn alloy of copper and tin, the latter being present in levels between 
        2% and 16%.  Since it is difficult to tell by looking whether an object is 
        made of copper or bronze, nekoshet is used to denote both.  It is safe to 
        translate it as “bronze” when casting is involved, because bronze makes 
        a cleaner cast, and “copper” when an object is hammered into shape.
                   The origin and discovery of bronze is uncertain.  The most proba-
        ble locations areSyria, Armenia, and the Caucasus.  Bronzes have been 
        found at Ur of Sumeria dating from 2500 B.C., but the absence of metal 
        ores of any kind there means that it is unlikely bronze was discovered 
        there.  Bronze first appeared in Palestine just before 2100 B. C., or the 
        Middle Bronze Age.  Even during this age, bronze was by no means com-
        mon in Palestine.  Solomon is said to employed nekoshet in both senses 
        of the word lavishly in the adornment & furnishing of the temple.  Since 
        Israel had no highly skilled smiths, Solomon was obliged to import an ex-
        pert from Tyre to supervise the work.  The casting of the bronze was done 
        in the Jordan Valley.

BROOCH  (חח (khawkh))  An ancient ornamental piece of jewelry, shaped 
        somewhat like a bent bow, with a pin.  They came into common use in 
        Palestine in the 600s B.C. 

BROOD (nossion (nos see on)) A group of young birds, especially of dome-
        stic fowl.

BROOK  (נחל (nakh al))  A small stream & its bed, called a wadi in Arabic, 
        which may flow all the time when fed by springs, or completely dry most 
        of the time, except after large amounts of rainfall. The same Hebrew word 
        may also refer to a river or valley, depending on the context of the pas-
        sage and the geography of the area involved.  The brooks of ancient Pale-
        stine and the eastern Jordan were numerous.  They flowed into the coastal 
        plain, the Sea of Galillee, the Jordan Valley, and the Dead Sea.  Brooks 
        were considered a pleasant feature of the land & important as sources of 
        water for the villages often located near them.  They were also used for in-
        dicating important national or tribal boundaries, or other locations.    

BROOM  (רתם (ro them))  A desert shrub or bush which frequently grows quite
        large, and offers a bit of shade. Job 30.4 refers to this tree, but scholars 
        disagree as to the translation of the Hebrew word lachmam. The King 
        James Version translates it as “their meat”, while the Revised Standard 
        Version translates it as “to become warm.”

                                   B-54

BROTH  (מרק (maw rawk))  The water in which meat is boiled, and which is 
        often eaten along with the meat.

BROTHERHOOD  (אהוה (aw vah), brother; adelfwV, (ah del foes))  Scrip-
        ture has no interest  in brotherhood as such.  To discover what the Bible 
        has to say about brotherhood is essential to study its message about actual 
        brothers.  Brethren should be friends, yet the Old Testament (OT) candidly 
        depicts disruption,  war, and death caused by greed, cruelty, spoiled self-
        centeredness, injustice, and other sins between brothers.  It depicts strife 
        between: Cain and Abel, Esau and Jacob, Joseph and his half-brothers.  
        Joab carried out vengeance on Abner for the death of his brother Asahel. 
                   This is contrasted with Abraham's love of Lot, and Judah's for Benja-
        min. It was concern for racial purity that sometimes made it necessary for  
        man to marry his brother's widow.  Thus the OT teaches that, within the 
        nation, a man is his brother's keeper—a truth that has bearing on matters 
        of social welfare, trade, and religious custom.  Quite apart from blood rela-
        tionship, “brother” may be used of friends, such as David and Jonathan, 
        and Solomon and Hiram of Tyre. 
                   In the New Testament (NT) little is made positive of natural kinship;
        rather, such kinship may conflict with, and must yield to, the claims of 
        God's kingdom.  Jesus probed the deepest meaning of the OT command-
        ment to love one's neighbor and extended it to ones enemies and “to the 
        poor who can't invite you back.”  The men and women who responded to 
        Jesus with a measure of faith in his mission are his pupils or apprentices 
        but also his “brethren.” Christ's identification with his people and his disci-
        ples is notable at baptism, in mission, and at the Judgment where “brethren” 
        need not be confined to disciples.  Service and unity are keynotes of the 
        brotherhood of disciples.
                   Ideas of the church formulated after Pentecost gather up similar 
        thoughts. There is the brotherhood of the New Israel and Christ as the true 
        “Elder Brother.”   Brotherly love, therefore should be typical of congrega-
        tions as a close-knit corporation of believers.   This love is commanded, 
        and obedience to it attests love for God. 
                    “Brethren” was the regular and perfectly genuine mode of address 
        in spite of the dissension that existed.  They constituted a spiritual brother-
        hood, distinct from the “world” as were the Qumran covenanters, and para-
        doxically exclusive because they made such high claims for themselves as 
        God’s elect through Jesus Christ.  The wonder of the NT is how slaves and 
        masters and believers from every tongue and nation were called by Christ 
        into a religious society for which the word “brotherhood” was a fitting title.

BROTHERLY LOVE (filadelfia (fil ah del fee ah)) The Old Testament has
        the same idea though not a word for “brotherly love,” for “neighbor” in Levi-
        ticus 19 means “brother Israelite,” and the rule of neighborly love is exten-
        ded to the resident alien. True friendship is a lasting and peculiarly close 
        bond of love often closer than that of blood brothers, as the story of David 
        and Jonathan shows. 
                   In the New Testament, Christians are a family, a brotherhood in
        Christ's service.  For them, brotherly love is intense, because of their com-
        mon covenant faith, and hope; but it is embodied in that perfect love, agape,
        which is universal in its range.  Since it's inspired by Jesus and his Spirit, it 
        is gentle, kind, patient, pardoning, self-effacing, and sacrificial. 

                                B-55

BROTHERS OF THE LORD (adelfoia tokurion (ah del foy  too  koo 
        ree on)) The men commonly thought of as younger brothers of Jesus. 
        Mark lists them as James, Joses, Judas, and Simon; Matthew names James,
        Joseph, Simon, and Judas. These brothers didn't approve of Jesus' ministry.  
        This is clear in Matthew’s, Mark’s an Luke’s gospels.  John's gospel agrees 
        that “even his brothers didn't believe in him.”  Jesus' response was that a 
        prophet is without honor “in his own house.”  They object to his ministry, at 
        times believing him to be “beside himself.”  Because of this, none of the 4 
        brothers could have been numbered among the 12 apostles.
                   It is clear, however, that James saw the risen Lord.  The brothers 
        thus became members of the Jerusalem church from its earliest beginnings.  
        James became the recognized leader of the church at Jerusalem, accor-
        ding to Paul in Galatians 1.  Paul may or may not have considered James 
        an apostle; even if he did it was not necessarily as one of the 12 Apostles.  
        The New Testament (NT) thus regards the brothers of the Lord as sons of 
        Joseph and Mary, unresponsive to his preaching during his earthly ministry, 
        but active and leading members of the church from the beginning of the apo-
        stolic age.
                   This NT view was challenged by the middle of the 100s A.D.  By 
        the 300s, 3 positions each had a vigorous advocate.  The 3 views were:
        Helvidius; Epiphanian; Hieronymian (Jerome).  According to Jerome's ho-
        stile comments, which is our only source about Helvidius, he held that the
        brothers of the Lord were Joseph and Mary’s sons, younger than Jesus.   In 
        this view, Helvidius claimed to follow Tertullian and Victorinus. 
                   According to Epiphanius, Jesus' brothers were sons of Joseph, but 
        not of Mary.  Some argue that the fact that his brothers tried to exercise 
        control over Jesus shows that they are older than Jesus and so not sons of 
        Mary.  Holders of this view believe that Joseph had been previously mar-
        ried and had 4 sons by that wife. 
                   They believed that Joseph was 80 years old when he married Mary 
        that he never had normal marital relations with Mary.  The main support 
        for this view is found in the apocryphal gospels from the middle of the 
        100s.  It found wide acceptance in the 200s and 300s and in all later times.  
        It is the view of the Greek Orthodox and other Eastern churches and many 
        Protestants.
                   Jerome argues that James the brother of the Lord, was an apo-
        stle.  The mother of this James & of Joses was Mary of Clopas, Jesus' 
        aunt.  He argued that the word “brother” can, and in this case does carry 
        the meaning of kinsman. Later writers identify Judas (“not Iscariot”) and 
        Simon the Zealot as brothers of the Lord, thus placing three of the four 
        brothers among the 12.
                   The Helvidian view rests upon the natural meaning of the relevant 
        NT passages, namely that they show that they are younger brothers and 
        are sons of Joseph and Mary.  Jerome argues that James must have been 
        one of the 12 because he is called an apostle in Galatians 1.  According to 
        how the word “apostle” is used, he could have been one without being 1 of 
        the 12.  Jerome's idea that the “brothers” were cousins is seemingly contra-
        dicted by the fact that these brothers are always found in the company of 
        Mary the mother of Jesus, in a way that does not suggest that they are 
        only cousins. 
                   Also, the names James, Joses, Judas, and Simon were four of the 
        most common Jewish names at that time; the appearance of them among 
        both the apostles and the brothers does not mean that they overlap.  The 
        real concern of Jerome is rather to ward off the conclusion that Mary ever 
        had normal marital relations with her husband or bore other children after 
        the birth of Jesus.
                   The Epiphanian view has one distinct advantage over Jerome's: it 
        rests on a tradition from the mid-100s.  But it has no support in the NT.  
        The argument that only older brothers of Jesus would assume authority 
        over Jesus is subjective and unconvincing; younger brothers could be criti-
        cal and demanding if they agreed with others that Jesus was disgracing 
        his family and hometown by his zealous activity. 
                   The argument of Epiphanius are neither substantial nor convincing, 
        except when supported by the conscious or unconscious assumption that 
        it was unbelievable that God would permit Mary, mother of the sinless 
        Christ, to give birth to other children who would share the sinful state of 
        humankind, or that Mary was, before or after the birth of Jesus, anything 
        other than a virgin. 
                   Those who find these feelings justified may follow the Epiphanian 
        view and accept its early church tradition.  Those who settle the question 
        by NT evidence usually favor the Helvidian view, which seems to be a view 
        which is justified by the Scriptures themselves.  The view of Jerome is not 
        supported by either the Scriptures or by early Church tradition.

                                B-56

BUCKET  (דלי (del ee, dol ee))  A leather bucket was used for drawing water 
        from a well or cistern. Sticks in the form of a cross kept the mouth of the 
        bucket open.

BUCKLE  (porph (por peh)) A clasp for fastening an outer cloak by pinning it 
        at the shoulder, sometimes used to reward valor or designate rank.  Gold 
        clasps on purple was reserved for the king’s friends and kinsmen.   

BUCKLER  (מגן (maw gan))  A small, usually round, shield carried in the hand 
        or worn on the arm.  English translators have not been too exact in making 
        the distinction between larger shields protecting the whole body and the 
        smaller bucklers.  The word is used literally, especially in describing Solo-
        mon's ceremonial buckler, decorated with gold; after they were looted, they 
        were replaced by bronze.  The word is used figuratively in the King James 
        Version for the protection of God (II Samuel 22, Psalm 18).

BUKKI (בקי, great abundance of the Lord)    1.  A chief of the tribe of Dan; one 
        of those who divided Canaan among the Israelites.     2. An Aaronite  
        priest, descendant of Eleazar and Phinehas.

BUKKIAH  (בקיהgreat abundance of the LordA Levite, son of Heman; one of
        those appointed by David to prophesy with musical instruments in the 
        temple.

BULL, BULLOCK  (אביר (‘ab beer))  Bulls were part of a gift of cattle for Esau.
        Figuratively, “bulls” are used for:  the aggressive vigor of Joseph; the pride 
        & strength of Assyria; the leaders of Babylon, etc. By far the most common 
        use of “bull” in the Bible is as sacrificial animal. The animal must be uncas-
        trated & at least eight days old.  Most of the Old Testament references to 
        the bull are in the priestly narratives, and are connected with the inaugura-
        tion of the sacrificial system or with sacrifices on various sacred days.  The 
        more important of these occasions are: consecration of priests (Exodus 
        29); the dedication of the altar of the tabernacle (Numbers 7); the purifica-
        tion of the Levites (Numbers 8); the Passover and the Feast of Weeks 
        (Numbers 28); and the Feast of Booths (Numbers 29).
                   The use of bulls in Israel's rituals was part of Western Asian religi-
        ous tradition. The Canaanite recognition of El, head of the Ugaritic gods, 
        as “father bull El” enhanced the cultic value of bulls along the Mediterra-
        nean coast.   It is uncertain whether this belief had any influence on the 
        golden bulls (“calves”) Jeroboam set up at Bethel and Dan.  There were 
        12 bronze bulls under the bronze sea at the Jerusalem temple.

BULRUSH (גמא (go meh)) A kind of reed which grew abundantly in swampy 
        places and beside streams.  Boats and baskets were made from them.

BULWARK (חיל (khale); מצור (maw tsour))  A barrier or wall constructed for 
        defense.  The literal use of these words includethe bulwarks (ramparts 
        in RSV) of Zion (Psalm 48); the defenses of Babylon (Jeremiah 50); and 
        the incorrect use of “bulwarks” in the King James Version to describe the 
        military works thrown up by the besiegers. Other words are use figuratively 
        & translated as “bulwarks,” especially in Psalm 8 which describes God's 
        salvation.  In the New Testament, in I Timothy 3, the church is said to be 
        the “pillar and bulwark of the truth,” although the Greek word would be bet-
        ter translated “foundation.”

BUNAH (בנה Head of a family of the clan of Jerhmeel of the tribe of Judah.

BUNDLE OF THE LIVING (צרור החיים (tser ore  ha khay oh eem))  A figure
        of speech found in I Samuel 25, expressing the state of being preserved 
        among the living.  Just as the owner of precious articles carries them in a 
        bundle or pouch close to the body, so does the Lord keep in a bundle 
        close to the Lord's self those persons decreed to live.  It is related to the 
        concept of the “book of the living.”

BUNNI (בוני   1. A postexilic Levite who attended Ezra's public reading of the 
        law.     2.  A Levite, the father Hashabiah, and perhaps identical with the 
        first entry.     3.  A chief of the people.

BURDEN (משא (mas saw); סבל (saw bal))  In addition to its literal usage, 
        this term is often used in a figurative sense (e.g. Moses describes the peo-
        ple of Israel and their disputes as “burdens” in Numbers 11 and Deutero-
        nomy 1, respectively).   In Isaiah, “burden” is used for the guilt pronounced
        by God upon a nation. 
                                B-57
BURIAL  (קבורה (keb oo raw))  The proper interment of the dead was a mat-
        ter of great importance to the peoples of the ancient near East.  It is not 
        easy to determine whether the Hebrew word refers to the act or to the 
        place.  In Biblical use, it often indicates a tomb, and is variously rendered as 
        “burying place.”
                   The antiquity of burial customs in Palestine is shown in the tradi-
        tions concerning the cave of Machpelah, where Sarah, Abraham, Isaac, 
        Rebekah, Leah, and Jacob were buried.  The position of bones found in 
        Palestine suggests that as early as the Stone, Chalcolithic, and early 
        Bronze ages care was taken in burying the dead. For various prominent 
        figures of the Bible, only the name of the city or region is mentioned as a 
        burial place. 
                   David and Solomon, and the kings that followed from both Israel 
        (the North) and Judah (the South) are said to have been buried in the 
        City of David. The precise location of the burial places is not described in 
        these passages; it is improbable that tombs were in the inhabited sec-
        tions of the cities named.  Excavations reveal that tombs were often 
        reused, and the bones from former burials were pushed to one side.  Indi-
        vidual burials in singles graves were not common.
                   Among the burial places for which a specific location is given may 
        be mentionedunder an oak tree at Bethel (Genesis 35); in gardens (II 
        Kings 21); in a house (I Samuel 25; II Kings 2; II Chronicles 33); and espe-
        cially in John 19, describing the burial place of Jesus as “in the garden 
        there was a new tomb where no one had been laid.” Regarding the burial 
        in a house, which was done with Samuel, Joab, and Manasseh, this may 
        indicate the revival of an ancient practice, or may merely be a euphemis-
        tic way of referring to a tomb. 
                   Coffins weren't common among the Hebrews. Elaborate wooden 
        coffins, shaped in the likeness of human figures and ornately decorated 
        were often used in Egypt.  Ceremonies at the time of burial doubtless va-
        ried from generation to generation.  Joseph's embalming was unusual 
        among Hebrews but common among the Egyptians whose families could 
        afford it.  Likewise, cremation was not practiced by Jews or early Chris-
        tians, as it was on occasion by Greeks and Romans.
                   Burial usually took place on the day of death, probably for reasons 
        of sanitation and fear of defilement.  Relatives prepared the body for 
        burial and mourned the death.  Lack of burial was considered a great tra-
        gedy; to provide burial for another was a virtuous act.  Possessions of the 
        deceased were often buried with the body.  Canaanite and Moabite tombs 
        have been found to contain weapons, jewelry, lamps, scarabs; food and 
        wooden furniture such as trays. 
                   Hebrew law forbids the offering of food to the dead.  The full theo- 
        logical significance of biblical burial practices is not known, but it seems 
        clear that they indicate an early belief in survival after death, and the neces-
        sity of providing in a material way for such an existence.

BURNING (בער (baw ‘ar); יקד (yaw kad); מוקד (mo kade); שרף (seh ray 
        faw)) The act of consuming combustible materials by fire is mentioned fre- 
        quently in the Bible.  It is usually used literally in describing an actual 
        burning (e.g. Bush (Exodus 3); fire on the altar (Leviticus 6); mountain 
        (Deuteronomy 5); incense (I Kings 9); furnace (Daniel 3); and city (Reve-
        lation 18), but sometimes figuratively in referring to anger (of Yahweh; 
        Joshua 7, Psalm 69) lust (Isaiah 57), pain (Job 30), etc. 

BUSH, BURNING (סנה (sen eh), bushThe flaming bush through which Moses 
        became aware of the presence of Yahweh at Mount Horeb.  The Hebrew 
        word for “bush” is only used in this instance.  It is assumed from early tra-
        dition that it was a thorn bush, and it is possible that the name of the bush 
        is derived from a root meaning "thorny" or sharp.  The species of bush has 
        not been identified.
                   The significance of the account is Moses' awareness of the pre-
        sence of Yahweh.  Modern attempts to rationalize or to find some natural 
        explanation for such an account overlook two important aspects of early 
        Semitic life(a) the Semites used dramatic and picturesque language to 
        portray spiritual and mental experiences; and (b) miracle and the superna-
        tural were accepted facts of life, not subject to rational explanation.  

BUSHEL ( modioV (mow dee os))  In Matthew 5 and Mark 4, it refers to a ves-
        sel which could cover a light.

BUTLER (משקה (mash keh)) An officer of high rank, close to the person of the 
        king, who originally had charge of the wine for the royal table.  In the 
        Joseph story, the butler and the baker were fellow prisoners with Joseph. 
        This suggests that both were household servants and that only minor 
        political influence belonged to them.  This butler speaks a good word for 
        Joseph, who eventually becomes an overseer in the land.  

                             B-58

BUTTER (מחמאת (ma kha maw ‘oth), milky (sweet) words)    1. A figure of 
        speech for the smoothness of a traitor’s speech.      2.  The King James 
        Version translation of Hebrew word translated as curds in the Revised 
        Standard Version.

BUZ  (בוז, contempt)    1.  The second son of Milcah and Nahor, Abraham's 
        brother (Genesis 22)      2.  A man from the tribe of Gad.      3.  A place 
        mentioned in Jeremiah 25.

BUZI ( See Buz)  The father of Ezekiel.

BUZITE (בוזי)  An inhabitant or native of Buz, probably an Arabian tribe or terri-
        tory; their location is uncertain. 

BUZZARD (ראה (raw ‘ah); דאה (daw ‘ah))  A medium-sized bird of prey.  
        There is some doubt as to this word's accuracy.  Only one ancient manu-
        script has ra' ahseveral others have da'ah or kite.

BYBLOS (bubloV (bib los))  The Greek name of the ancient Phoenician 
        town Gebal.

BYWORD  (משל (maw shawl), proverb; שנינה (shen ee naw), sharp saying, 
        gibeThis word appears only in its negative sense in the Bible ( “. . .to 
        become an object of derision among other people”) almost always in 
        connection with God's wrath against Israel or an Israelite (See also 
        Proverbs).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aramaic-Az

A-Aram-Z